Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Oct 2006 (Monday) 14:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which WA lens for 5D?

 
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Oct 24, 2006 17:13 |  #16

delhi wrote in post #2159649 (external link)
16-35L? eww.... it has some pretty bad barrel distortion.

All the zooms in this range do. I use primes when distortion is a factor. Oh, almost forgot, the Sigma 12-24 EX has extremely low distortion but it needs to be at f16 or f22 for best sharpness.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drookie
Member
Avatar
209 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: California, USA
     
Oct 25, 2006 22:06 |  #17

16-35 I love mine!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stavhp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK
     
Oct 25, 2006 22:07 |  #18

16-35 f/2.8, nothing like fast glass
Damn, i still havent got any


Canon 7D, sigma 17-70, Canon 50mm F1.8, Canon 70-300mm IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/stav-p/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties.....​... Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Avatar
7,686 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 25, 2006 22:09 |  #19

16-35L. A lens I'll never let go.


~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thai (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raphael ­ Emond
Senior Member
Avatar
430 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Oct 26, 2006 01:37 |  #20

I have the 12-24, and I'm very happy on APS-C format.

Distortion is non-existant, slow lens, but sharpness wide open is decent, and at f8 is superb for my copy. Since you can shoot it at very slow shutter speeds, it never bother me. It's really convenient to shoot anything, from landscapes, buildings, indoors and never to worry about barrel/pincussion,

But the 16-35 / 17-40 / Sig 15-30, are all great lens in their respective range.
You can't go wrong with any of them, choose what your shooting style need.


Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
420EX, Sigma 1.4X Converter, Moded Off-Shoe Cord 2, 2x1Gb + 1x2Gb, Pelican 1550 Case, Hoya IR72, Mono-Tripod.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Oct 26, 2006 02:02 |  #21

Wilt wrote in post #2158684 (external link)
Best for different people is dependent on what they are trying to shoot! For me, a FF 35mm camera is 'best' fitted with a 24mm lens...while I own 20mm, I find most of my wide angle needs are fully met with 24mm (whereas 28mm was not wide enough for me in shooting interiors, but 28mm was fine for wedding groups and candids). So the 24-70 might work well for you...it would for me if I was using the 5D!

So a 15mm on APS-C would be great for interiors, 17mm would be fine for wedding groups and candids with APS-C camera, making the 17-55mm the equivalent of the 28-70mm on 5D.

agree. as much as i love my 17-40 the 24-70 would become my WA lens on FF and the 17-40 would get sold.

a huge advantage of FF is 24mm without having to buy a SWA lens.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
Oct 26, 2006 03:06 |  #22

I thought not being able to use my Tokina 12-24 any more would kill me but the 17-40 on a 5D blows it aways (it fits the 5D but can only be used from 21mm - 24mm without the darkness).
My vote for the 17-40, I was spoilt for IQ with the 24-105 and ended up going with the L over the others 17mm zooms. I have no regrets. Have a look on my site for the images done with the 17-40....

..yes there will be barrel distortion at 17mm, but most wide zoom lenses have that and is easily fixed in PS if need be.


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amarasme
Member
146 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Spain
     
Oct 26, 2006 07:58 |  #23

KevC wrote in post #2158646 (external link)
17-40L


Agreed... I also love the 35L.


Canon EOS 5D, 20D
Canon 35 f1.4L, 50 f1.4, 85 f1.8, 135 f2L,
17-40 f4L, 24-70 f2.8L, 70-200 f2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,046 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47416
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Oct 26, 2006 11:34 |  #24

delhi wrote in post #2158641 (external link)
Just wondering what's the best wide angle lens to use with a 5D. Seeing the excellent EF-S 10-22 will not fit the 5D. Which leaves the sigma and the tokina. Anything else?

The 17-40 will give you more or less the same angle of view on the 5D as the 10-22 did on a 1.6 crop camera.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdenney
Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney
2,400 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2003
     
Oct 26, 2006 12:33 |  #25

Wilt wrote in post #2158684 (external link)
...So a 15mm on APS-C would be great for interiors, 17mm would be fine for wedding groups and candids with APS-C camera, making the 17-55mm the equivalent of the 28-70mm on 5D.

The 15mm lenses that I know of (excepting the Sigma 15-30 and the Voigtlander 15) are fisheye lenses, which wouldn't do for most interiors. Much as I like fisheye projection for lots of things, it usually doesn't work for architecture.

To the OP: If you want a wide that is 35% of normal, you'll need a lens in the 17mm range. For most people, that's almost more wide than they can tolerate.

But if you want obscene rectilinear wide-angle lenses such as the lens used in this shot:

IMAGE: http://www.rickdenney.com/images/burned_log_14mm_velvia_lores.jpg

Then you'll need what I call an extreme or ultra-wide lens. For full frame, there are few choices that will work. One of them is the Canon 14/2.8L, but I think the price/performance ratio on that lens does not recommend it. A cheaper alternative is either the Sigma or Tokina 14mm primes. I made the image above on Velvia (full frame, of course) with a 14mm Sigma.

The only ultra-wide zoom that will cover full frame is the Sigma 12-24, which is an excellent general-purpose extreme wide for those of us who think extreme wide is routine.

If 17mm is wide enough, the 17-40/4L is mighty hard to beat for the money. I think you'll find that the 20-35 ain't shabby, either, though it isn't as wide. But the L is cheap enough to make it worth spending more.

Rick "a fan of extreme wides" Denney

The List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 26, 2006 12:36 |  #26

rdenney wrote in post #2172399 (external link)
The 15mm lenses that I know of (excepting the Sigma 15-30 and the Voigtlander 15) are fisheye lenses, which wouldn't do for most interiors. Much as I like fisheye projection for lots of things, it usually doesn't work for architecture.

My statement was in the context of APS-C format...I had forgotten the OP was about the 5D when it was written. but I did close with the statement that 24-70mm on the 5D was good for interiors (I mistakenly had typed '28' rather than '24' and left it uncorrected since everyone loves the 24-70L and writes about it incessantly)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TH!EN
Member
140 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
     
Oct 28, 2006 04:16 |  #27

guys is here anything wider than 14mm for fullframe on a canon mount?
I know theres like peleng 10mm or 8mm but those are fisheye? ive done soo much research and own a 17-40mm which i am satisfied with but i have a client insisting that they need a 10mm wide on full frame. As far as i know without going fisheye thats impossible.


Bodies: Canon EOS 1DS Mk II
Glass: 17-40mm f4, 24-70mm 2.8, 70-200mm 2.8 IS
Accesories: 580 EXII, AB800
TNFOTO.COM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raphael ­ Emond
Senior Member
Avatar
430 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Oct 28, 2006 04:20 |  #28

Sigma 12-24 is the widest rectilinear lens made for canon mount and have AF
The lens resolves around 122° wide. Which is pretty wide... Almost impossible to use.. :)


Canon Rebel XT, BG-E3, Sigma 12-24 EX DG HSM, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 24-105L IS USM, Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG HSM
420EX, Sigma 1.4X Converter, Moded Off-Shoe Cord 2, 2x1Gb + 1x2Gb, Pelican 1550 Case, Hoya IR72, Mono-Tripod.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Oct 28, 2006 04:20 |  #29

TH!EN wrote in post #2180845 (external link)
guys is here anything wider than 14mm for fullframe on a canon mount?
I know theres like peleng 10mm or 8mm but those are fisheye? ive done soo much research and own a 17-40mm which i am satisfied with but i have a client insisting that they need a 10mm wide on full frame. As far as i know without going fisheye thats impossible.

Sigma 12-24.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarklin
Senior Member
608 posts
Likes: 89
Joined Aug 2006
Location: People's Republik of Kalifornia
     
Oct 28, 2006 10:06 |  #30

I bought a 16-35L with my 5D and have used it a lot more than I thought I would. I also have used the 2.8 aperture a lot more than I thought I would too......why limit yourself when this superb tool is available?


Canon EOS 5D also Mk III, 24-70L, 85 IIL, 24-105L, 70-200 f/2.8 IS L, 180 Macro L, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, 100-400 L IS, 8-15 L Fisheye f/4, 16-35 L, 50 L , TS-E 24 L, 600 L, Extender 1.4X & 2X II, Speedlite 580EX x 2, MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite, ST-E2, Angle Finder C, RS-80N3 Remote Switch, Focusing Screen EE-D, BG-E4, Manfrotto 458B Neotec tripodw/Acratech 1155 GP Ballhead.:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,239 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
Which WA lens for 5D?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2711 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.