I have the 50mm 1.8.
Is there an affordable (under $1000) wider prime around 17mm that would give me similar sharpness and low light performance?
JustBe Goldmember 1,449 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Seattle area More info | Oct 24, 2006 12:37 | #1 I have the 50mm 1.8.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Oct 24, 2006 12:40 | #2 not really. you are better off looking at something like the 17-50 2.8 tamron. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rhinotherunt Looking for a Rock 7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Oct 24, 2006 12:42 | #3 You could get a zoom like Canon 10-22 or Sigma 10-20. Primes that come to mind are Canon 20mm, 28mm L & 35mm L... or Sigma 30mm, 14mm, 20mm Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeWhy "Monkey's uncle" 10,596 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Pasadena, CA More info | Oct 24, 2006 12:50 | #4 Sigma and Tamron 14mm primes are f2.8, Sigma also has a 20mm f1.8 prime is cheap but I don't think as sharp as the 50mm. Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Oct 24, 2006 13:59 | #5 The 35mm f/1.4L is awesome - but I don't think it'll be wide enough for you? There's also a 24mm f/1.4L. La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
angryhampster "Got a thick monopod?" 3,860 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2006 Location: Iowa More info | Oct 24, 2006 14:07 | #6 Sigma 15mm fisheye if you're interested too. Steve Lexa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cosworth I'm comfortable with my masculinity 10,939 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Duncan, BC, Canada More info | Oct 24, 2006 14:17 | #7 Then correct the fisheye (if you so choose) with a great little plug in called PTlens. people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CoolToolGuy Boosting Ruler Sales 4,175 posts Joined Aug 2003 Location: Maryland, USA More info | Try the EF 28 f1.8. It simulates a normal lens on a 1.6x camera. It is around $400. Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2755 guests, 153 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||