Meet Jo

This is Jo who came to my studios last week, let me know what you think

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

Nice photos, lovely model.

The only criticism that I could offer is maybe whiten the teeth and clone out a few stray hairs on the first two shots?

agree with above. 1st picture has distracting "strays" on left side.
The 3rd picture has a great effect.
The 4th picture, Is it supposed to be b/w or is it tinted blue? My monitor makes it look 2 blue but maybe that was the effect you were after.

Thanks guys, I will sort out the stray hairs, not sure about the blue though, was aiming for black and white with a tint of blue, not blue overkill. Have another shot with the guitar Id like to post but not sure where people portraits become glamour. Dont want to offend with a see thru top

Dave

The last photo looks slightly cool... Not so much black and white I'd say as "toned." Looks good to me, though.

I don't think a sheer top would be offensive. Could always post under "Glamour/nude."

needs a few more posts for the g/n.

I didn't mean it was overkill btw.

would happily post work in GN but I have nowhere near enough posts to be able too. I dont shoot too much glamour, and really enjoy quality headshots, but hey if the job comes along......

Ahh right, the post count... You could post a link (with a warning perhaps) and not the actual photo itself.

Ok ... here goes: Pose #1 & 2 ... flat lighting ... up the ratio a good bit . Also she has hi-key clothes ... on a low key background.

Pose #3 There is no light in her eyes, so they look sunken

Pose #4 way too bright and again flat lighting

All would have been better with a 3:1 or 4:1 ratio.

D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog., ASP
loryphotog@mindspring.​com

Thanks thats all good comment....