Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 26 Oct 2006 (Thursday) 09:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

wife 1860 circa sepia

 
jsg
Member
115 posts
Joined Feb 2006
     
Oct 26, 2006 09:33 |  #1

any thoughts on this 1


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keiffer
Goldmember
Avatar
2,259 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Orlando Fl.
     
Oct 26, 2006 09:35 |  #2

Looks too soft and dark for my taste.



http://kcschoeppler.fo​topic.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 26, 2006 10:14 |  #3

I really like the frame. The image needs work IMHO. Too soft and too flat. The effect can work if you would keep the eyes and lips brighter and sharper.


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jaime
Goldmember
Avatar
2,464 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
     
Oct 26, 2006 11:18 |  #4

I would widen the picture to show more, the crop is too tight in the frame.


"My eyes see but a minute reflection of what my soul
longs to capture through the sensual art of photography."
Jaime E. Pagán
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=6253713#p​ost6253713

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Freddeh
Member
71 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Dordrecht, the Netherlands
     
Oct 26, 2006 12:37 |  #5

I'm sorry, I don't like it. All I can say is: Bride of Chucky :/


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D. ­ Craig ­ Flory
Goldmember
1,333 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Oct 26, 2006 12:58 as a reply to  @ Freddeh's post |  #6

Here is your image brightened and enhanced. I hope this helps others see what you were trying to accomplish.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
ASP // loryphotog@mindspring.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Oct 26, 2006 13:00 as a reply to  @ D. Craig Flory's post |  #7

the edited shot just makes that photo look fantastic!


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Plan9
Member
233 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
     
Oct 26, 2006 13:28 |  #8

the original is extremely soft, with terrible compression. There are lots of artifacts and posterization, especially in the edited shot where the shadows have been lightened. I'd reshoot it if I were you. Make sure to include more of the neck and ears this time was well, it will be far more flattering



flickrgallery (external link)
Photojournalism Major at The Brooks Institute of Photography (external link)
"...He made me suddenly realize that photographs could reach eternity through the moment."
Henri Cartier-Bresson

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
malla1962
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,714 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk
     
Oct 26, 2006 17:53 as a reply to  @ Plan9's post |  #9

I like it but think it would be better if the crop was not so tight as it gives me the feeling she is being crushed.:D


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taygull
Goldmember
Avatar
3,091 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: McKinney, TX
     
Oct 26, 2006 17:55 |  #10

I think it needs more "texture" to look like it was from 1860..I do like it though.


www.chrisfritchiestudi​os.com (external link)
McKinney, TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pcDigiMan
Senior Member
300 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: USA, S. E. Michigan
     
Oct 26, 2006 20:42 |  #11

What were you trying to accomplish?


Cheers,

Bob - A Swell Guy
_______________
7D, 20D, EF-S 17-85mm f4/5.6 IS, EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L, EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS, 2x II, 580EX, 430EX (x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taygull
Goldmember
Avatar
3,091 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: McKinney, TX
     
Oct 26, 2006 20:49 |  #12

pcDigiMan wrote in post #2174541 (external link)
What were you trying to accomplish?

common sense reading the title would tell mehe was trying to create a picture that looks like something that would have been taken in 1860?:cool:


www.chrisfritchiestudi​os.com (external link)
McKinney, TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaertX
Goldmember
Avatar
2,018 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Amarillo, Texas
     
Oct 26, 2006 21:02 |  #13

it looks like she's mad because you stuck her in a tight box and underexposed her.


Jason - I use Canon and stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LTP
Member
53 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Oct 27, 2006 14:47 |  #14

What the last guy said...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,819 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
wife 1860 circa sepia
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2690 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.