joe445 Senior Member  541 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Port St Lucie, FL More info | Oct 28, 2006 09:43 | #16 blonde wrote in post #2179955  Ritz is not reputable or knowledgeable by any means, they are just big. EVERY single time i have been to Ritz, i am just shocked at their lack of knowledge.. That is so true! -Zero knowledge for high prices, nice trade off Canon 5D Mark II w/BG-E6 grip--CanonEF 24-105mm f4 L IS-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied  12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Oct 28, 2006 09:50 | #17 "Comes complete with case and strap." from the original link - I'd be interested to see where the strap would fit on the teleconverter... Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dan-o Goldmember  3,539 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2006 Location: So. Cal. More info | Oct 28, 2006 10:12 | #18 Jim G wrote in post #2181424 "Comes complete with case and strap." from the original link - I'd be interested to see where the strap would fit on the teleconverter...  unless they're throwing in a camera strap for free!I'm surprised it didn't say it comes with a hood also. Danny.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GlennNK Goldmember  4,630 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Victoria, BC More info | Oct 28, 2006 11:06 | #19 Double Negative wrote in post #2181313 It just wouldn't fit. The reason they specify longer focal length lenses is because the extenders protrude into the lens! If the rear element isn't as equally recessed, you'll have problems. Notice the black tube sticking out of the top:
Just looked carefully at my 24 - 105: The rear of my lens projects backward from the face of the bayonet mount. The front of this extender projects forward from the face of the mount. Thus there appears to be approximately 1/2 inch (13 mm) of conflict between the lens and the extender. When did voluptuous become voluminous?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joegolf68 THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,269 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sacramento CA area More info | Oct 28, 2006 12:10 | #20 So many great answers and replies about this subject. Thanks! Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles*  10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Oct 28, 2006 12:10 | #21 Glenn NK wrote in post #2181685 Just looked carefully at my 24 - 105: The rear of my lens projects backward from the face of the bayonet mount. The front of this extender projects forward from the face of the mount. Thus there appears to be approximately 1/2 inch (13 mm) of conflict between the lens and the extender. Furthermore, the "opening" in the rear of the 24 - 105 is rectangular (with round corners), and it appears that the round projection of the extender would not fit into this rectangluar opening. The proverbial "round peg in a square hole..." La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000)  More info | Oct 28, 2006 12:25 | #22 It even looks like it's the MkI in the image? GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Oct 28, 2006 13:37 | #23 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2181935 It even looks like it's the MkI in the image? It is... The Mark II's say "II" on them. La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2700 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
