Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Oct 2006 (Saturday) 21:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does this prove anything?

 
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 21:10 |  #1

I just did a test that I see posted here all the time. I believe this test reveals if a lens is having any back or front focus problems and if that is the case then I guess I have tested my new EF 50mm f/1.8 II and it seems to be doing what it should and the focus is dead on.
Does this test actually prove that? or anything else for that matter?

All 4 pics were shot at f/1.8, 1/80s. The camera was 2 feet in front of the first battery and each successive battery is 1 foot further away and 2 " to the right of the previous.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:05 |  #2

what are you trying to prove? I dont get it. where is FP on each shot?


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:07 |  #3

Your batteries are spaced too far apart.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:09 as a reply to  @ Dante King's post |  #4

I thought I recalled seeing this as a means of testing a lens using AF to see if it was front or backfocusing. I should have indicated that in each shot the battery in focus is the battery that was the focus point and each time I had the camera AF it did it with accuracy and did not pull anything in front of in back of the focus point into focus.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:10 |  #5

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2184064 (external link)
Your batteries are spaced too far apart.

How close should they be?


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:11 |  #6

The battery test is valid if the batteries are spaced far apart enough across as to avoid the "large" AF sensor catching on another battery, but close enough depth-wise to know whether it's front or back focusing.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:14 |  #7

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2184078 (external link)
The battery test is valid if the batteries are spaced far apart enough across as to avoid the "large" AF sensor catching on another battery, but close enough depth-wise to know whether it's front or back focusing.

So if the batteries were 1 inch or 2 inches apart would that work?


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:15 |  #8

TMR Design wrote in post #2184091 (external link)
So if the batteries were 1 inch or 2 inches apart would that work?

Depends how accurate you want to test. That would test for 1-2 inches of back/front focus. :p


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:24 |  #9

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2184094 (external link)
Depends how accurate you want to test. That would test for 1-2 inches of back/front focus. :p

Oh ok, I get it now.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Skip ­ Souza
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,204 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Mar 2005
Location: The Left Coast in the Land of Fruits and Nuts
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:28 |  #10

To answer the title question.
It proves that you don't use Duracell batteries.


Looks like your lens/camera combination works right to me.


Bless the recently fallen and their family and friends.
I have a Cannon with me at all times. You can't take the shot if you don't have something with which to shoot. :rolleyes:
That which does not kill me ~~ Should Run.
5DMkII, 7D, 70-300L IS, 24-105L,
No more PayPal gift payment requests.
"PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
newfly5
Senior Member
Avatar
372 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: kansas
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:33 |  #11

If you want a quick test without dl the test sheet shoot at 45 degrees on a newspaper pick a certain sentance and check your results. With your test it could be off, just not 2 inches off and you wouldnt know.


Ben

30D 17-552.8 is 50 1.4, 80 1.8, 28 1.8,tammy 28-75, 17-40L, 70-200L 2.8,10-22 canon, 24-105L, rebel xt, AB strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Oct 28, 2006 23:51 |  #12

newfly5 wrote in post #2184143 (external link)
If you want a quick test without dl the test sheet shoot at 45 degrees on a newspaper pick a certain sentance and check your results. With your test it could be off, just not 2 inches off and you wouldnt know.

Interesting. I'll give that a try for kicks. I don't actually suspect there is anything wrong with my lens. I am just geeky enough that this sort of thing is fun. :cool:


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,063 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Does this prove anything?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2711 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.