Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 28 Oct 2006 (Saturday) 22:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

IPTC what do you use

 
pagefile
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New Hampshire
     
Oct 28, 2006 22:37 |  #1

I would like to know what is the program that you use to input your data. Is there a programe you use that is just for IPTC? I know of BreezeBrowser and using PhotoShop CS2. I have read that you should not use PhotoShop for IPTC.

I really dont want to install another programe to edit images, I will if its a good one for IPTC.

What is it that you like to use for this? And can you put your info into more than one image at one time?



<<
My Gear>>

"It is better to solve the right problem the wrong way than to solve the wrong problem the right way.”
Richard Wesley Hamming

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Oct 29, 2006 01:58 |  #2

It depends what your needs are. Personally I use Photo Mechanic, but probably my use is a bit different. I need something fast and PM is probably fastest one. But it's just for preview, selection, captioning and transmiting. It doesn't have any editing functions so you have to have another program for that.
In case if speed is not so important, then I guess you can do those things in PS too. But on the other side, PM is much more when it comes to this. It can ingest files from card and on same time rename files, add caption (same one to all files of course), sort them into directories etc. But you have to decide if it's worth $150 for your need. It definitely is for mine :)


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeeJay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,834 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Warwickshire - UK
     
Oct 29, 2006 04:04 |  #3

Same here, I use Photo Mechanic. For what reason do you want to use the IPTC data?


1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea :confused:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pagefile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New Hampshire
     
Oct 29, 2006 07:36 |  #4

primoz wrote in post #2184451 (external link)
It depends what your needs are. Personally I use Photo Mechanic, but probably my use is a bit different. I need something fast and PM is probably fastest one. But it's just for preview, selection, captioning and transmiting. It doesn't have any editing functions so you have to have another program for that.
In case if speed is not so important, then I guess you can do those things in PS too. But on the other side, PM is much more when it comes to this. It can ingest files from card and on same time rename files, add caption (same one to all files of course), sort them into directories etc. But you have to decide if it's worth $150 for your need. It definitely is for mine :)

I just looked at PM, it looks very good. I think that it is a program that I would like to try.

TeeJay wrote in post #2184728 (external link)
Same here, I use Photo Mechanic. For what reason do you want to use the IPTC data?

I would like to use IPTC for archiving purposes, that way I can find the images that I am looking for at a later date. I could also have a desciption of the image and so on.

I have 4 boxs of images from my film days and its hard to remember where thay are all from. I would like to put a stop to that. One day I will be gone, It would be nice for my grand kids to be able to go through the photos and know what, where and who the images are of. When you look at some of you grand parents photos, you ask who is that or where is that.

I will scan the film images one day and ad that info as much as I can. But for now all my digital shots, I would like to add that info as I go.



<<
My Gear>>

"It is better to solve the right problem the wrong way than to solve the wrong problem the right way.”
Richard Wesley Hamming

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
primoz
POTN Sports Photographer of the year 2005
Avatar
2,532 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Anywhere where ski World cup makes its stop
     
Oct 29, 2006 10:10 as a reply to  @ pagefile's post |  #5

Smart idea. You are one of few people I know (even if "I know" is a bit stretched here :) ) who went into IPTC for personal reasons. I'm trying to tell people that IPTC is far from pro use only. Yes it came from this, and I started to use it because agency I was working for required that. But with digital going this way as it's going, IPTC will be adopted by hobby photographers too... sooner or later. And I suggest to jump this train sooner and not later :) And because exactly this reason you stated.


PhotoSI (external link) | Latest sport photos (external link)http://www.photo.si (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pagefile
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New Hampshire
     
Oct 29, 2006 12:34 |  #6

primoz wrote in post #2185503 (external link)
Smart idea. You are one of few people I know (even if "I know" is a bit stretched here :) ) who went into IPTC for personal reasons. I'm trying to tell people that IPTC is far from pro use only. Yes it came from this, and I started to use it because agency I was working for required that. But with digital going this way as it's going, IPTC will be adopted by hobby photographers too... sooner or later. And I suggest to jump this train sooner and not later :) And because exactly this reason you stated.

Yes, I dont think you have to be a pro to use the tools that we all have available to us. I know lots of hobbyist try to get the gear that the pro's use. The hobbyists try to learn how the pro's use PhotoShop to edit there images. So why not do like the pro's and use IPTC and tag our images for archiving.

It would be nice to find the images you are looking for. I dont want a family member to come over to my house and ask me if they can get a print of such and such place with so and so in that photo. Just to tell them, I cant find the one they are looking for or it will take me some time to find that image for them. Call me back in a month or so, I should have it then for you.

I think that IPTC is a very important tool that should be used by all. I know that I am new to the use of IPTC, but it is not hard to learn at all.



<<
My Gear>>

"It is better to solve the right problem the wrong way than to solve the wrong problem the right way.”
Richard Wesley Hamming

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rense
Senior Member
Avatar
289 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Arnhem
     
Oct 29, 2006 12:47 |  #7

I use Idimager (external link), it can add IPTC data when downloading from the card, when your categorizing it and when you edit pictures (for instance for publishing on the web).


Rense (http://rense.smugmug.c​om (external link))
[5D][20D][EFS10-22][Sigma12-24][Sigma 15][EF17-40][TS-E24][Sigma30][EF50;f1.​8][EF24-105][Tamron28-75][EF70-200][EF70-300DO][EF85 1.8][EF100 Macro][Sigma105][EF135 2.8SF][Bigma][TamronTC​1.4x][580EX][420EX(2x)​][M24EX][DigiFlash][Va​riosixF2+Spot][EPSONP2​000][Manfrotto 55AB, 55PROB][LoweProTrekker AWII][Billingham550]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
taygull
Goldmember
Avatar
3,091 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: McKinney, TX
     
Oct 29, 2006 22:01 |  #8

why would you not use PS CS2?


www.chrisfritchiestudi​os.com (external link)
McKinney, TX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
transcend
Goldmember
Avatar
1,461 posts
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Squamish, BC
     
Oct 31, 2006 22:11 |  #9

taygull wrote in post #2188247 (external link)
why would you not use PS CS2?

Because it is as slow as molasses when compared to Iview and photo mechanic. Batch tagging is quick and painless.


http://www.fraserbritt​on.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,355 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
IPTC what do you use
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1031 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.