MrWills Senior Member  684 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Oct 29, 2006 20:59 | #1 Here is a shot of Jen, this is her first studio work.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Shawn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ABrownPhoto Goldmember  4,676 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2006 Location: SoCaL More info | Oct 29, 2006 21:46 | #2 Wow, very nice shot!!! i honestly cannot comment on anything negative here! Awesome job to me! He still has one more move.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
whiskaz Goldmember  1,503 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Parkersburg, WV More info | Oct 29, 2006 21:49 | #3 Ditto! I love the setup... Nice attention to detail Jeremy | Gear List | EyeDigress - A Photoblog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 29, 2006 22:02 | #4 whiskaz wrote in post #2188199  What's your lighting setup if you don't mind sharing? 3 AB 800's Shawn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
christyjo2 Goldmember 2,275 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Arkansas More info | Oct 29, 2006 22:05 | #5 I love this shot! very well done! *Christy* "If at first you dont succeed...destroy all evidence that you tried." www.christyfullerphotography.info
LOG IN TO REPLY |
whiskaz Goldmember 1,503 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Parkersburg, WV More info | Oct 29, 2006 22:12 | #6 Shawn... I'd love to see a shot of that bg/hairlight/deflector setup... if you wouldn't mind PMing it to me whenever you get time? The blown out white is something I'm trying ot achieve with just 1 light on the bg, like you've done, but haven't been so lucky... Jeremy | Gear List | EyeDigress - A Photoblog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DanteKing "Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister  9,134 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: San Anselmo, California More info | Oct 30, 2006 01:24 | #7 shawn, this is a nice shot, but your save for web technique is really lacking. Went to your site to look for this shot and it was pretty bad there too. Dante
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2006 05:29 | #8 Dante King wrote in post #2188905 shawn, this is a nice shot, but your save for web technique is really lacking. Went to your site to look for this shot and it was pretty bad there too. I hope I am not offending you. Not my intention. Since you have a site, why are you attaching an image when you can link a better quality one? I save like this and link: Resize image to 800 pixels on the longest dimension and when doing so, use bicubic sharper. Then convert profile to sRBG. Save as jpg quality 10. then link the photo. I would LOVE to see this shot in a higher IQ format. No not at all, I am not very good with the net stuff and the one that is on my site should of been the good quality one. I will have to fix that, I will from now on link my images from my site. Thanks Shawn
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 30, 2006 09:14 | #9 Great shot of a lovely girl would look even better with a higher res as Dante stated Canon R3 l RF600mm F4 L | RF100-500mm L IS l RF14-35mm L l RF24-105mm F4 L l RF 100 2.8 L | RF 1.4 & 2.0 Ext l RF100mm 2.8 Macro L l Speedlite 580EX II l 600EX II Speedlite l Manfrotto MK055 Pro3 Tripod l Manfrotto MPMXPROA4 Monopd with XPRO monopod+fluid base l Image ProGraf 1000 Printer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2837 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Forget using POTN to upload your images... use Flickr or Smugmug... might save you from having to down-sample the image so much. Even with the obvious loss of IQ, it looks great!
