Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 30 Oct 2006 (Monday) 15:29
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Two 2GB or One 1GB"
Two 2GB sandisks
111
76%
One 4GB sandisk
35
24%

146 voters, 146 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two 2GB, or One 4GB

 
surfologist
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Florida
     
Oct 30, 2006 15:29 |  #1

What is better between getting one 4GB Extreme III, or two 2GB extreme III.
Why do you feel this way?


My! Gear! Bag!
All of my money has gone to L!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Oct 30, 2006 15:31 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

1 4gb, never had a sandisk card go bad in 6 years, the other card is one more thing you have to carry around. inserting and removing cards makes them go bad faster.


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
surfologist
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Florida
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:06 |  #3

Thanks. That helped


My! Gear! Bag!
All of my money has gone to L!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Papaw
Senior Member
Avatar
765 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: North Central Texas
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:18 |  #4

After I download my card to the computer I keep the data on that card until the pictures are processed, printed or copied to a disc. Sometimes I need to use the camera again before that batch is completed and could just pop that extra card in.
If you shoot RAW it would be nice to have a 4gb for weddings or prolonged shoots as well as several one or two gb cards for the shorter sessions. I have noticed these cards have been dropping in price lately.


1D MKIIN 30D 20D and G6
35L 85L 400L 17-40L 24-70L 24-105L 70-200 f/2.8L IS
10-22 f3.5 60 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SoaringUSAEagle
Daddy Of The Crop
Avatar
10,814 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:26 |  #5

coreypolis wrote in post #2191709 (external link)
1 4gb, never had a sandisk card go bad in 6 years, the other card is one more thing you have to carry around. inserting and removing cards makes them go bad faster.

That's my thought. Sandisk is very reputable and I own a 4GB and 2GB... I use the 4 mostly all the time.


5D4 | 50 1.4 | 85L II | 24-70L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
work_at_bored
Member
59 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Downers Grove, IL
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:28 |  #6

don't put all your eggs in one basket.

2- 2GB


-Paul-
my equipment


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:43 |  #7

I would get two, if one goes bad, you still have another, if you only have one, well as was said, "don't put all your eggs in one basket."


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Oct 30, 2006 16:47 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

work_at_bored wrote in post #2192032 (external link)
don't put all your eggs in one basket.

2- 2GB

that was true with mircodrives, but studies have found you're more likely to have a card go bad from repeated insertion/removal then for its internals to go bad, so the opposite of what you said is actually true.


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
12345Michael54321
Senior Member
559 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore County, Maryland, USA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:06 |  #9

Many people have this idea that it's better to use four 1 GB cards (or two 2GB cards), rather than one 4 GB card, because if the card goes bad, one would only be out 25% (or 50%, in the case of the pair of 2GB cards) of the day's shooting, and not 100%.

Others would maintain that this conveniently ignores the fact that with 4 cards, there is several times the probability of at least one going bad, than there would be with a single card. It ignores the fact that the smaller capacity cards mean much more removing and inserting of cards - and this is where cards get dropped in sand or mud, and where the little pin contacts in the camera get bent (potentially rendering the camera out of commission pending repair). And it ignores the fact that sometimes it's a disruption to have to swap cards, even if swapping cards does only take a few seconds.

When I was shooting primarily 35mm, I didn't typically opt to shoot 12 exposure rolls of film, thinking that "This way, if the processor loses or ruins a roll, I've only lost 12 pictures, and not 36." But hey, to each his own.

Anyway, if I were shooting some "once in a lifetime, can't be repeated" event, like a wedding (may the gods have mercy on me and simply have me torn apart by jackels, instead), I'd definitely have multiple CF cards with me. The idea of covering such an event, with but a single card - no matter its capacity - is out of the question. Same way that I'd probably have a second camera with me. Yes, this means added cost. That's just the way it is. If the event's so important that losing the pictures would be a disaster, it's important enough to merit some back-up gear - like two cameras, 4 CF cards, etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:11 |  #10

I voted for the 4 gb because if I had the money to get it, I would. Since I don't and I'm cheap, I have 4 1 gb cards and when I finally get my 5D, I'm in trouble!


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:24 |  #11

two,... its a fail safe.

One card dies, you atleast have 1 more.

I have 1 micro drive
and 2 san disk cards.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
Avatar
4,175 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:30 as a reply to  @ StealthLude's post |  #12

I use a Flashtraxx to unload my cards, so having two lets me keep shooting on the second one while I empty the first.

Have Fun,


Rick

My Gear list

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:31 |  #13

A point that nobody on this thread has discussed:

Mr. Murphy says that if you only own one memory card, it will be in your card reader at home when you pull your camera out of the case at a location over an hour from home. The event will only last two hours.

I had this happen to me. My 2GB card was in the reader at home. The difference was that I had two 1GB cards in my camera case. They saved the day for sure. I now have two more 1GB cards in my case - a total of 6GB worth of space that I don't ever anticipate needing all of. The extra cards are insurance against failure or stupidity.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:34 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

SkipD wrote in post #2192341 (external link)
A point that nobody on this thread has discussed:

Mr. Murphy says that if you only own one memory card, it will be in your card reader at home when you pull your camera out of the case at a location over an hour from home. The event will only last two hours.

I had this happen to me. My 2GB card was in the reader at home. The difference was that I had two 1GB cards in my camera case. They saved the day for sure. I now have two more 1GB cards in my case - a total of 6GB worth of space that I don't ever anticipate needing all of. The extra cards are insurance against failure or stupidity.

I can't immagine only having one actual card. I still have tons of 128s/256s from the d30 days. then a few 1gb from the 10d days, and now 4gbs for the 1 series days


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 30, 2006 17:38 |  #15

coreypolis wrote in post #2192352 (external link)
I can't immagine only having one actual card. I still have tons of 128s/256s from the d30 days. then a few 1gb from the 10d days, and now 4gbs for the 1 series days

A lot of newbies seem to buy only one memory card when getting their first digital camera. Some learn the hard way that they should have split the money into more than one physical card.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,431 views & 0 likes for this thread, 40 members have posted to it.
Two 2GB, or One 4GB
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1823 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.