Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 30 Oct 2006 (Monday) 15:29
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Two 2GB or One 1GB"
Two 2GB sandisks
111
76%
One 4GB sandisk
35
24%

146 voters, 146 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two 2GB, or One 4GB

 
Reefbone
Senior Member
Avatar
929 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Midwest, USA
     
Nov 13, 2006 14:57 |  #46

surfologist wrote in post #2191699 (external link)
What is better between getting one 4GB Extreme III, or two 2GB extreme III.
Why do you feel this way?

Does anyone else think that it's strange that the above question got three pages of responses? (Oops I made it four!)


Rebel XT, EF-S 17-55IS f/2.8, EF-S 17-85IS f/4-5.6, EF 50 f/1.4, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 580EX, Manfrotto Anchor, I9900

"I may disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for my right to fight you to the death" - Stephen Colbert

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Digital_Duck
Senior Member
Avatar
468 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Holly Springs, NC
     
Nov 13, 2006 15:58 |  #47

One thing to consider may be how many different photo locations on one card.

Let's say you are going to cover a couple car shows - the first one wasn't as good or didn't have as many money shots. You can separate which card at which location without downloading it all.

I have a pretty fast duo core notebook and it still takes a good few minutes to transfer 2 gig of images to the computer.

I suppose if the whole 4 gig is on one shoot - it won't matter much...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rklepper
Dignity-Esteem-Compassion
Avatar
9,019 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2003
Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA.
     
Nov 13, 2006 16:07 |  #48

I like the 4 GB. Sandisk is relaible and also a 4 GB card fits nicely on a DVD for archival purposes.


Doc Klepper in the USA
I
am a photorealist, I like my photos with a touch of what was actually there.
Polite C&C always welcome, Thanks. Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 14, 2006 12:52 |  #49

I use 4 GB, since RAW+small on the 5Deats up anything smaller too fast. The 2 GB cards are in the 20D.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,434 views & 0 likes for this thread, 40 members have posted to it.
Two 2GB, or One 4GB
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1823 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.