Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 31 Oct 2006 (Tuesday) 10:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best lens for portraits a 50mm f1.8?

 
sweetypie925
Senior Member
Avatar
324 posts
Joined Oct 2006
     
Oct 31, 2006 10:11 |  #1

Wanting to start out doing some portrait photography. I have a 400D (Rebel XTi) with the kit lens. I really like the pics I've seen that have been taken with the 50mm f1.8 lense. So what do you think? Also where can I buy one? I've only been able to find it online. Is that where I have to buy it or would a regular camera place have it?


5D, Canon 50 1.4http://www.teresanicol​eblog.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rhinotherunt
Looking for a Rock
Avatar
7,129 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Jasper, AL
     
Oct 31, 2006 10:28 |  #2

It does a great job for the price. Some may say a bit long for portraits on a crop body, but I am weird I use 85mm as a portrait lens on crop body and find 50 a little short. B&H is a great dealer to do online purchasing through.


Ryan McGill
My Gearhttps://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=592450

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peterdoomen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,123 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Lier, Flanders (northern, flemish speaking part of Belgium)
     
Oct 31, 2006 12:05 |  #3

Generally considered to be *the* portrait lens is the 85L, but that one is expensive. Price/quality the 50 f/1.8 aka nifty fifty is very good. But you can take good portraits with a wide range of lenses, ranging from 35 to 200 mm. The focal length you want to work with, depends on the subject and the photographer.

P.


Canon EOS 20D | Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS + Hoya UV Filter | Canon Extender 1.4x | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Canon 85 f/1.2L mk II | Tamron 17-35 f/2.8-f/4| Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Tokina 100 f/2.8 macro | Kenko extension tubes | Canon Speedlite 420 EX & Sto-fen Omnibounce| 80GB Flashtrax | Manfrotto Tripod 190 pro B & Joystick 322RC2 | Lowepro Micro Trekker 200
PDFs: Make money with ShutterStock (external link) - Make your own Tabletop Studio (external link)- Glass Buying Guide (external link)
My ShutterStock Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 31, 2006 13:14 |  #4

'The portrait lens' for 35mm film SLR has been once which falls into the 85-105 range. That translates into 55-70 for an APS-C format camera!

Read this about lenses for various types of portraiture. It is not a one-size-fits-all necessarily, so if you want to shoot a particular type of portrait, the 50mm might be the right lens (especially considering the price of the 50mm f/1.8!)

https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=2128677&po​stcount=15


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dgcorner
Goldmember
4,722 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: New Zealand
     
Oct 31, 2006 13:22 |  #5

The 1.8 has the best bang for $$$ but if you are seriously considering portraiture shots go for the 85mm. I also hear that the Sigma 30mm is really good... this gives you approx. a 50mm perspective on a cropped sensor btw.


John;)

Believe... Work hard... and it will happen!

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AeroSmith
Goldmember
Avatar
4,600 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 536
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Saint Petersburg, Florida
     
Oct 31, 2006 13:36 as a reply to  @ dgcorner's post |  #6

Check out the 85/1.8. That works out to 136mm full frame equivalent. And I can telly you that the 135L on a FF camera is down right perfect for portraits. I think you'll find the 85 to be a better lens than the 50/1.8 in oh so many ways.


Josh Smith

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twistedinsight
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
     
Oct 31, 2006 14:28 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

i totally agree AeroSmith. i have both, and let me tell you the 85mm, when i started posting examples, brought the customers left and right. so much more sharp. fast lens, both are good, but shell out the $350 or so for the 85mm f/1.8 usm and you will not be dissapointed.


| Canon 5D mkII | Canon 5D | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L | Canon 28-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 85mm f/1.2L | Canon 50mm f/1.4 |
Check out my website, and my Blog! Comments are always greatly appreciated!
http://www.jrowephotog​raphy.com/ (external link)
http://www.jrowephotog​raphy.com/blog/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D. ­ Craig ­ Flory
Goldmember
1,333 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Oct 31, 2006 14:54 as a reply to  @ twistedinsight's post |  #8

The best lens for a portrait ... depends on what you are are creating portraits for. If a group portrait, a normal length, to a slight telephotowould be called for. If a couple, or one person, you should use a longer telephoto. A zoom with a nice range from wide to telephoto would work well. The longest should be at least 135mm.


D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
ASP // loryphotog@mindspring.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Texbow
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
     
Oct 31, 2006 15:24 |  #9

I don't mean to highjack this thread but if you only have a limited amount of studio space say, 20' X 15' will the 85MM be a little long for full body shots? The 85 for outdoors seems to be good but not sure about limited space. Maybe someone that shoots studio can comment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 31, 2006 15:28 |  #10

Texbow wrote in post #2196848 (external link)
I don't mean to highjack this thread but if you only have a limited amount of studio space say, 20' X 15' will the 85MM be a little long for full body shots? The 85 for outdoors seems to be good but not sure about limited space. Maybe someone that shoots studio can comment.

Way too long!!! Go read the link mentioned in message #4


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Texbow
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
     
Oct 31, 2006 15:36 |  #11

Wilt, I did. If I understood it correctly, then the 85 would not work in the studio. I guess I was looking for conformation just to make sure I was not missing something.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 31, 2006 15:50 |  #12

Texbow wrote in post #2196907 (external link)
Wilt, I did. If I understood it correctly, then the 85 would not work in the studio. I guess I was looking for conformation just to make sure I was not missing something.

As I have posted, the 85 would work wonderfully for a tight headshot! But you would have to back up about 5x the distance to fit an entire bodyshot in to the frame!

Even for a head and shoulders shot with 85mm, you would have to back up the camera about 2.5x from the distance of a tight headshot. That, to me, puts me farther from the subject than I prefer...makes it too hard to adjust their position subtley, adjust light aiming and intensity when needed, etc. without walking back and forth more.

(Some people prefer longer shooting distances, but I find the facial perspective of the subject is not optimized for the distances that our brains are so accustomed to seeing faces in interacting with others.)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Texbow
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
     
Oct 31, 2006 16:47 |  #13

Your last point is a good one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Texbow
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Cypress, Texas
     
Oct 31, 2006 16:49 |  #14

I'm thinking the ideal small studio lens would be the 24-70 2.8 L lens. With my 50MM I find myself having to move to far away for those full body boudoir shots.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4582
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 31, 2006 17:16 |  #15

You could also do well with the 24-105 range. The f/4 would lose you only 0.1' of DOF at 6' shooting distance, so it is not catastrophically deeper!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,991 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Best lens for portraits a 50mm f1.8?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2797 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.