Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Nov 2006 (Thursday) 17:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you use your lens hood indoor for portrait work?

 
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 10:11 |  #16

tsaraleksi wrote in post #2210722 (external link)
I think it's mostly because the 50/1.8 is recessed on the front-- it doesn't need a hood because it more or less has one built in. This is the same reason that many will tell you not to put a UV filter on it-- because it would be difficult to get anything in to break the lens. That and it is a little sillly to put nearly $60 worth of protection (hood+filter) onto a lens that cost $70.

A UV filter I can see - a quality one would cost about as much as the lens. The hood however, pricey as it may be - is a darn good idea regardless. It's not about protecting the front element as much as it is eliminating as much stray light as possible. If the Canon one is too expensive for you, bo buy a rubber one - they're great on the 35mm and 50mm.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Nov 03, 2006 10:15 as a reply to  @ Double Negative's post |  #17

With respect to a UV filter....aren't there benefits of using a UV filter other than to protect a lens? It seems everyone generically uses them as protection but what about the actual purpose of the filter?


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Nov 03, 2006 10:19 |  #18

If the lens has a hood, it goes on and stays on when I shoot, indoors or out. The only time I use a UV filter is if there is some extreme condition like blowing sand that necessitates it's use.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 10:37 |  #19

TMR Design wrote in post #2210819 (external link)
With respect to a UV filter....aren't there benefits of using a UV filter other than to protect a lens? It seems everyone generically uses them as protection but what about the actual purpose of the filter?

Well, there's the UV light that they're designed to filter out. Typically you only see this when at the beach or at high altitudes perhaps. Another argument says that most cameras block UV anyway.

Dunno, I just use it for protection and to complete the sealing of my L zooms as Canon recommends you do. I shoot from studio to harsh environments so I just leave them on 24/7. I've never had an issue with my Heliopans, UV or CPL that warranted removing them.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chtgrubbs
Goldmember
1,675 posts
Joined Jul 2003
     
Nov 03, 2006 14:47 |  #20

My hoods are alway on when shooting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mebailey
Goldmember
1,992 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Jul 2005
Location: USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 15:24 |  #21

I would not bother with a hood indoors with a flash.


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckie8
Senior Member
Avatar
995 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Wake County, NC
     
Nov 03, 2006 16:08 |  #22

The only time when I hate having a hood on is when you have to take those plastic lens caps on & off. You actually need needle nose plier like fingers to get them on & off unless you have the center pinch lens caps like what Tamrons got.


Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Nov 03, 2006 16:15 as a reply to  @ Luckie8's post |  #23

I got center pinch caps for my lenses. Otherwise there is no way to get the cap on the Sigma 17-70mm with the hood on.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 16:27 |  #24

I swapped out all my Canon caps for Tamron-style knock-offs. Word to the wise - spend the money and get the real Tamron caps, they're built much better.

Also good for slim filters that have reduced threads out front. Canon caps have deep threads and don't hold on as well as the Tammies...


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Nov 03, 2006 16:37 |  #25

Double Negative wrote in post #2212467 (external link)
I swapped out all my Canon caps for Tamron-style knock-offs. Word to the wise - spend the money and get the real Tamron caps, they're built much better.

Also good for slim filters that have reduced threads out front. Canon caps have deep threads and don't hold on as well as the Tammies...

Do they work on the real slim filters or do you need push on caps for those?


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 17:06 |  #26

TMR Design wrote in post #2212518 (external link)
Do they work on the real slim filters or do you need push on caps for those?

The knock-offs and original Tamron caps work better for two reasons; a) the threads aren't as deep as the Canon caps so they work better on slim filters (in my experience) and b) they have two ways to remove the cap - the typical outside tabs like Canon but also the inner "pinch style" tabs. Great for when you have a hood affixed.

Short answer - yes they do (as Canon's do also) but better, IMO.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Nov 03, 2006 17:08 |  #27

TMR Design wrote in post #2212414 (external link)
I got center pinch caps for my lenses. Otherwise there is no way to get the cap on the Sigma 17-70mm with the hood on.

??? I had no problem with mine. You got stubbies? :D

I just pushed in one side, then the other.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Nov 03, 2006 18:02 |  #28

Mr. Clean wrote in post #2212621 (external link)
??? I had no problem with mine. You got stubbies? :D

I just pushed in one side, then the other.

No I am talking about the lens cap supplied with the Sigma lens. I have small hands and fingers and there was no way to possibly get it in or out. Perhaps if I wanted to work at it I could snap it in but no way to get it out. Putting the lens cap on and off should not be any work at all. I have many more things to concentrate on. :lol:

But you do have to be careful when buying center pinch caps. If you buy the Dot-Line brand it has a small nubbie (not sure if that is what you are calling a stubbie..lol) intended for a lanyard or kap keeper of some sort and it prevents the cap from sitting inside the hood. You need the Tamron or the Hama.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Nov 03, 2006 18:24 |  #29

TMR Design wrote in post #2212828 (external link)
But you do have to be careful when buying center pinch caps. If you buy the Dot-Line brand it has a small nubbie (not sure if that is what you are calling a stubbie..lol) intended for a lanyard or kap keeper of some sort and it prevents the cap from sitting inside the hood. You need the Tamron or the Hama.

Yep, my cheap knock-offs had those. A sharp X-Acto knife took 'em right off. :D


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,317 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Do you use your lens hood indoor for portrait work?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2815 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.