I think I am going to get one of these for my wife to go with her 24-105. She likes those light lenses, she tells me they are easy for a woman to carry.
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion  9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Nov 04, 2006 00:00 | #31 I think I am going to get one of these for my wife to go with her 24-105. She likes those light lenses, she tells me they are easy for a woman to carry. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 04, 2006 00:10 | #32 rklepper wrote in post #2214092  I think I am going to get one of these for my wife to go with her 24-105. She likes those light lenses, she tells me they are easy for a woman to carry. yeah i remember when "your wife" wanted to become a prime shooter because the 24-70L was too heavy for "her" to carry http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikez Senior Member 364 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2006 Location: TX More info | Nov 04, 2006 00:22 | #33 ed rader wrote in post #2213507 here's the closest thing i can find to a duck tonight. my cat horton @ f4, iso 400, 100mm, 1/20th sec. ed rader Ed,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rklepper Dignity-Esteem-Compassion 9,019 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2003 Location: No longer living at the center of the known universe, moved just slightly to the right. Iowa, USA. More info | Nov 04, 2006 00:24 | #34 ed rader wrote in post #2214114 yeah i remember when "your wife" wanted to become a prime shooter because the 24-70L was too heavy for "her" to carry  .ed rader No actually it is the 24-105 that she likes the most. Now I have 2 24-70's to shoot all I want. I think one will go to finance the 70-200. Doc Klepper in the USA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied  12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Nov 04, 2006 00:33 | #35 Dang, that looks sharp... If I didn't need f/2.8 for most of the stuff I do I'd definitely be considering it Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 04, 2006 00:59 | #36 mikez wrote in post #2214144 Ed, could you post the actual pixels of the picture or 100% crop? Thanks mike - here you go 100% crop, untouched.
http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikez Senior Member 364 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2006 Location: TX More info | Nov 04, 2006 01:03 | #37 Thanks Ed,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 04, 2006 01:19 | #38 mikez wrote in post #2214258 Thanks Ed, it looks pretty sharp. I looked at the review at dpreview where the op compared the 200 2.8 with f4 IS and it doesn't look right too me. But thanks for the picture. mike -- what doesn't look right? you lost me. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JaGWiRE Goldmember 3,859 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | That's sharp. Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SproutCrumble Senior Member 448 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Essex, UK More info | Nov 04, 2006 07:19 | #40 Such a pity about the price. I'd get one tomorrow but to change from my non-IS would cost me the equivalent of almost $1000. Utter madness. EOS 80D, DMC-GF5, DMC-G6, 8-15L, 24L, 35L, 40/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 85L, 100/2., 100L, 150/2.8EX OS , 300/2.8EX, 10-22/3.5, 70-200/2.8EX, 150-600/5.0C, 17LTSE, 45TSE, 65MPE, 1.4EX/2xEX, MR14EX, 580EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
redhotsheep Goldmember  1,576 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: London More info | I agree crumble - looks a great lens but the price (UK especially) is a bit hard to swallow.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
freefallu Senior Member  592 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: madrid More info | Nov 04, 2006 07:45 | #42 Ed , stop posting fantastic images from that lens , your gonna get me in trouble with my missus. Cheers David Cowman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
350D_Noob Senior Member  877 posts Joined Jan 2006 Location: Virginia Beach, Va. More info | Nov 04, 2006 07:45 | #43 I'm scared to reed the article because of what everyone is saying. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lightstream Yoda 14,915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Cult of the Full Frame More info | Nov 04, 2006 07:46 | #44 Incredible.. absolutely incredible. It's just that I don't know how often I'd miss a f/2.8 aperture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Clean Cream of the Crop  6,002 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Olympia, Washington More info | Nov 04, 2006 08:54 | #45 Nice Ed, real sharp and stable! What body do you use? Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2895 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.
