Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 03 Nov 2006 (Friday) 15:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Perthshire shots

 
Mike ­ Reynolds
Goldmember
Avatar
1,412 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Joshua Tree, CA
     
Nov 04, 2006 13:35 |  #16

good job there I wish we had some green and water in this baron desert I live in


a special thanks to the Big Guy upstairs

http://mikereynoldsmot​orsports.com/ (external link)

my gear
https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2211782&pos​tcount=289

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stephen ­ Martin
Member
Avatar
186 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
     
Nov 04, 2006 14:29 |  #17

John, I like the colors in the water on #1. And I really like #2.

This is probably going to sound hokey...but since I use a Mac, I actually like to manage color better in iPhoto, than in PSE. Photoshop seems to degrade the image a lot quicker, and the algorithms for saturation, hue and temperature just don't have the same character as in iPhoto. I can also the export the image for email in iPhoto - which does great at making versions for the web...does a good job of retaining color.


-Stephen
Canon 30D, Canon EFS 10-22, Sigma 17-70 DG Macro, Sigma 70-200 APO Macro, Canon EF 1.8 50mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lesmac
Goldmember
Avatar
1,829 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Otley , Yorkshire, UK
     
Nov 04, 2006 16:11 |  #18

First for me, it's understated, captures the moment exceptionally well.
Good work.


Canon 1DS MKIII,7D, 85 1.2L, 24 F1.4L, 135 F2L, 200mm F2.8L,50mm F1.4, 120-300 F2.8, 12-24mm f 4.5
http://www.lesmclean.c​o.uk/ (external link)
Concentrate on equipment and you'll take technically good photographs. Concentrate on seeing the light's magic colours and your images will stir the soul. - Jack Dykinga

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Buggbairn
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Falkirk Scotland
     
Nov 05, 2006 01:00 as a reply to  @ Lesmac's post |  #19

Nice light in the 1st shot John

That area down by the river had lots of lovely colours, as you'll remember access was very restricted and I couldn't seem to get a decent shot in frame there.

No:2 is my favourite of the 4 I said it at the time that that area had great potential, we could've been doing with better skies at the time but as we all know you've got to make do with what you have eh.

3 and 4 were again areas where I struggled due to access, lovely areas though but not photographer friendly.


www.scottharrower.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Faolan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 137
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Scotland
     
Nov 05, 2006 03:48 |  #20

The first shot is what I call a classic, it's got a timeless serenity to it. The bottom right is a bit under-exposed however that may be down to sfw, if you do Save As as a JPG you should get better quality (and preserve EXIF data). Usually 8-10 is ok.

The last shot, it's a good fall shot but you've lost some detail in the shadows (particulary the arch). Try blending some exposures if you have shot RAW.


Some call me the Heilan' Laddie, but others call me Rob.
Flickr (external link) - Lighting set ups using Canon Flash/Elinchrom plus some general work.
Celtic Shadows Design (external link) - Photography and WordPress Development.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
weemannie
Goldmember
2,530 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Scottish Highlands
     
Nov 05, 2006 03:54 as a reply to  @ post 2215862 |  #21

John, this is a lovely series of photos. :D The cottage and bridge images are great and the autumn colours are wonderful. I wish I'd got out for some autumn shots before we had our storm. Hardly any trees left let alone leaves!

Take a look back at your previous threads and read the complimentary remarks by oodles of people. That should tell you something about the quality of your shots, methinks ;)


Regards, Trevor
5D MkIII, 60D, Zuiko 24mm, Zeiss ZE 21mm and 50mm 1.4, 70-300L, 10-22
http://www.scotlandima​gery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
urbandancer
Senior Member
Avatar
550 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Madrid,Spain
     
Nov 05, 2006 04:06 as a reply to  @ weemannie's post |  #22

My favourite is the birdge one, kinda magic man.
Like the frames with the embed Exif to,nice :D


Canon 50D
Canon 24-105 F4 L
Canon 70-200 F4 L
Sigma 10-20 4-5.6 EX

My DA
http://urbandancer.dev​iantart.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Bell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,977 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Perth, Scotland
     
Nov 05, 2006 04:47 as a reply to  @ urbandancer's post |  #23

I love what you've achieved in the first one - couldn't be bettered IMHO. The bridge is a close second - pefect choice of settings. To improve #2 I would have chosen a different arrangement of the foreground rocks. That's all. :)


Canon EOS 5DS R EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM EF 28mm f/1.8 USM EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM EF 85mm f/1.8 USM EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM TS-E 17mm f/4L TS-E 45mm f/2.8 TS-E 24.0mm f/3.5 L II EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chemicalbro
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,245 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: anywhere but here
     
Nov 05, 2006 05:02 |  #24

lovely shots John......the last one with the bridge I particularly like


Alan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
catsith
Mighty Award Winner
Avatar
6,265 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: brisbane australia
     
Nov 05, 2006 05:24 |  #25

i am soo glad you posted them, they are lovely shots. Photos don't have to be technically "perfect" to be enjoyed (and that is not a double edged complement, they are lovely photos)

i too change to 8bit, 800 x 600 or whatever is closest, and jpeg. Have never used save for web option.


Tina

www.tinadial.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mws3
Tartan abuser
756 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: perth Scotland
     
Nov 05, 2006 05:26 |  #26

the old bridge is my favourite

nice shots John

you got my 200th post too



Mark
_______________
Kit: 350D, 18-55mm lens, 70-200 Sigma, 55-300Sigma,Tamron 17-50mm, polarisers, canon remote, battery pack Lee filters and more to come

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rudgej
THREAD ­ STARTER
Couch-potato photographer
5,613 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Nov 05, 2006 07:20 |  #27

Reigh Higgins wrote in post #2215862 (external link)
Lovely shots John,I particularly like the bridge shot. Nice lighting. Thanks for sharing.

Thank you for commenting Reigh.

Mike Reynolds wrote in post #2215986 (external link)
good job there I wish we had some green and water in this baron desert I live in

We have too much water at times!

Stephen Martin wrote in post #2216189 (external link)
John, I like the colors in the water on #1. And I really like #2.

This is probably going to sound hokey...but since I use a Mac, I actually like to manage color better in iPhoto, than in PSE. Photoshop seems to degrade the image a lot quicker, and the algorithms for saturation, hue and temperature just don't have the same character as in iPhoto. I can also the export the image for email in iPhoto - which does great at making versions for the web...does a good job of retaining color.

I presume iPhoto is a Mac program, but even if not, I think that I would prefer to perhaps abandon Photoshop's "Save for web" and just take a bit more time fiddling with quality to bring the size down myself.

Lesmac wrote in post #2216537 (external link)
First for me, it's understated, captures the moment exceptionally well.
Good work.

Thank you Les. You don't run Photoshop courses do you as you seem to have that well mastered? ;)

Buggbairn wrote in post #2218306 (external link)
Nice light in the 1st shot John

That area down by the river had lots of lovely colours, as you'll remember access was very restricted and I couldn't seem to get a decent shot in frame there.

No:2 is my favourite of the 4 I said it at the time that that area had great potential, we could've been doing with better skies at the time but as we all know you've got to make do with what you have eh.

3 and 4 were again areas where I struggled due to access, lovely areas though but not photographer friendly.

I know what you mean, and especially with the cottage shot when the sky stayed whiter than a soap powder advert.

Faolan wrote in post #2218741 (external link)
The first shot is what I call a classic, it's got a timeless serenity to it. The bottom right is a bit under-exposed however that may be down to sfw, if you do Save As as a JPG you should get better quality (and preserve EXIF data). Usually 8-10 is ok.

The last shot, it's a good fall shot but you've lost some detail in the shadows (particulary the arch). Try blending some exposures if you have shot RAW.

I did shoot RAW, so I'll try both suggestions, thanks Rob.

weemannie wrote in post #2218751 (external link)
John, this is a lovely series of photos. :D The cottage and bridge images are great and the autumn colours are wonderful. I wish I'd got out for some autumn shots before we had our storm. Hardly any trees left let alone leaves!

Take a look back at your previous threads and read the complimentary remarks by oodles of people. That should tell you something about the quality of your shots, methinks ;)

Thanks Trevor, and I know what you mean. This forum is great for ego-boosting, but perhaps maybe I'm too self-critical as I feel that I can be doing better either compositionally or processing-wise.

urbandancer wrote in post #2218773 (external link)
My favourite is the birdge one, kinda magic man.
Like the frames with the embed Exif to,nice :D

Thanks UD. The framing is done automatically with Mike's framing script.

Mike Bell wrote in post #2218857 (external link)
I love what you've achieved in the first one - couldn't be bettered IMHO. The bridge is a close second - pefect choice of settings. To improve #2 I would have chosen a different arrangement of the foreground rocks. That's all. :)

Thanks Mike. I saw some of the other shots taken low down with an ultra-wide angle lens, and I preferred that look to my rocks.

chemicalbro wrote in post #2218869 (external link)
lovely shots John......the last one with the bridge I particularly like

Thank you Alan. Do you think you'll manage the fourth fabled Scottish POTN meet?

catsith wrote in post #2218918 (external link)
i am soo glad you posted them, they are lovely shots. Photos don't have to be technically "perfect" to be enjoyed (and that is not a double edged complement, they are lovely photos)

i too change to 8bit, 800 x 600 or whatever is closest, and jpeg. Have never used save for web option.

Thank you for your comments Tina.

mws3 wrote in post #2218920 (external link)
the old bridge is my favourite

nice shots John

you got my 200th post too

Your 200th? I'm honoured. :)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
Nov 05, 2006 12:46 |  #28

2 and 4 for me John, I think you have handled exposure of 4 very considering what looks like deep ranging light levels. :)


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miner
Senior Member
547 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Alabama
     
Nov 05, 2006 13:07 |  #29

All very nice John. My favorites would be 1 and 2.


Steve
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rudgej
THREAD ­ STARTER
Couch-potato photographer
5,613 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Nov 06, 2006 02:26 |  #30

Thank you for your comments Neil and Miner.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,393 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
Perthshire shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2776 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.