Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Jan 2004 (Monday) 21:01
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "What is better for downloading in the field?"
Portable CD Burner that burns CDs right from a CF card
3
10.3%
Portable Hard Drive (Digital Wallet)
26
89.7%

29 voters, 29 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portable CD Burner or Digital Wallet???

 
yeaton
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jan 19, 2004 21:01 |  #1

I am going on a 10 day vacation in a few weeks and wondered what other digital photographers used to free up space on their CF cards while they are "in the field." I do not have a laptop, so I cannot download to a computer while I'm away from my desktop. I have two 1GB CF cards, but I know that that will not be enough memory for 10 days. I'm considering getting one of those portable CD burners that read right from a CF card and creat a copy of the images on a CD. Has anyone used one of these burners before. If so, what are your thoughts on them and where can I buy one if that is my best option. I may have a chance to use a relatives computer with a CD burner, but I'm not 100% sure that opportunity will work out, so I want to be prepared. I've also considered getting a digital wallet like a Tripper, X Drive II, or a Super Digibin. What have you used and liked/disliked? Any help, tips, suggestions, or cautions are much appreciated!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Jan 19, 2004 21:07 |  #2

Personally, I'd opt for the CD's. Here's the deal - burn 2 CD's of everything and keep them in separate luggage. Redundancy is insurance against a bad copy (or a lost suitcase). Also, test the equipment before you go to make sure the CD's burn properly and your computer reads what the CD's have on them.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MarkH
Senior Member
Avatar
431 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
     
Jan 19, 2004 21:42 |  #3

Personally I think the portable HDD is the way to go. You can't burn a full 1GB card to a CD. A X'S Drive Pro with a 30GB HDD is all I need for weeks. When I get home I can transfer the images through USB2 to my PC then burn to DVD-R. As for data redundency, when I can track down a cheap HDD I'll put it in my older X's Drive II and I will be able to make a double copy of each card.


Mark Heyes (New Zealand)
See my pics at www.gigatech.co.nz (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jan 19, 2004 22:09 |  #4

Do they make a CD-burner that will copy a CF card at the touch of a button?

If not than definately an X-drive type thing... I hear the I-pod will work now,. with some kind of Delking adapter...


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ballen ­ Photo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,716 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 920
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Southern Nevada and Idaho
     
Jan 19, 2004 22:16 |  #5

I tend to lean towards the portable hardrive, only because I may want to tweak my photos in Photoshop before I burn them to CD. I have to admit that burning the CD straight from the card does sound attractive though.
........Bruce


The Captain and crew finally got their stuff together, now if we can only remember where we left it. :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
merlyn9
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2003
Location: Outside Chicago someplace?
     
Jan 19, 2004 22:17 |  #6

:roll: Well given that choice... the portable HD is the way to go.
I have the laptop w/ CD burner back at where ever my base for the day would be. I still have yet to be on a trip - including a 5-day bicycle/camping trip, where some power was not available for part of the over nite? And yes, for that I count my blessings... :lol:

A 30-40GB portable X-drive suites me just fine thanks!


---michael


_______________
Behind the Shutter Curtain (external link)
My General Galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichardSimon
Member
44 posts
Joined Jun 2001
     
Jan 19, 2004 22:41 |  #7

I voted for the HD option.
I have an X Drive II with a 40Gb disk in it. That translates to over 5,000 raw images; it has worked very well for me. The fact that the X Drive can do several 1GB transfers using its internal battery is a plus; however, it doesn't have a free space indicator, meaning you must keep a rough count of how many images have been stored. The data is about as secure as a laptop, since it has a nice case, and uses a standard laptop HD.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vvizard
Senior Member
727 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Hønefoss & Troms (Norway)
     
Jan 19, 2004 22:47 |  #8

For security/redundancy I would've used cd's. But in the real world, I must say that I'm using an X-drive myself for the pleasure/comfort it gives. But I don't trust harddrives the way I trust optical media. Probably never will. Had way to many harddrive crashes during the last 12 or so years. Although a failed harddrive have been less of a problem the last five of them, I still don't trust them, and probably never will, as long as there's magnetic storage, and moving parts in them..




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morenoar
Member
144 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Lancaster California
     
Jan 19, 2004 23:06 |  #9

Have you looked into the E-Film picture Pad. My wife got me this for XMAS, recommended by our photo department at work. Mine is a 20Gb that can read CF and Microdrives without an adapter. It can read other type of memory cards with the proper adapter. Had an LCD to preview the pics (this drains the batteries pretty fast). I have downloaded up 500 jpegs in Large format, and the battery indicator has only moved 1 notch from full charge. Only bad thing I see in it is that it is only USB 1.1 But I only have usb 1 on my PC and have tested USB 2.0 and it is not THAT great of difference. in my opinion.


Would LOVE to see the light one day. Help me achieve my goal.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vvizard
Senior Member
727 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Hønefoss & Troms (Norway)
     
Jan 19, 2004 23:18 |  #10

morenoar wrote:
and have tested USB 2.0 and it is not THAT great of difference. in my opinion.

USB-1.1 will be a bottleneck for most mediacards. USB-1.1 is only 12Mbps. That's 1.5MB/s. And now I'm talking "theoretical" speed according to the specs. And we all now what theoretical means in the computer-world =) USB-2.0 got a theoretical limit of 480mbps (60MB/s). So although today's media-cards are no way near to get bottlenecked by USB-2.0, they are already faster than USB-1.1 can deliver. Therefore, when moving from USB-1.1 -> 2.0, the speed of your cards will matter the most. My microdrive gives me roughly 2.8MB/s, which is almost the double of USB-1.1's theoretical limit. While my SD/MMC cards give me ~ 3.8MB/s, which is a 2.5x increase of USB-1.1's (theoretical) limit. So for me, that IS a difference.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Jan 20, 2004 01:28 |  #11

Hmmmmm.
I'm starting to see a trend here. :lol:


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Morden
Senior Member
483 posts
Joined Oct 2002
     
Jan 20, 2004 03:06 |  #12

Personally, I use an 'old' 10 GB Digital Wallet. It only works reliably when connected to the mains, but I have sufficient CF storage (6 GB) to last at least a full day. I use the Digital Wallet solely to keep a backup of my full CF cards (two copies are better than one, and two of my CF cards are those dreaded, oh so unreliable Microdrives 8) ). So, if I drop my 4 GB Microdrive on the way home and it fails, the 700 or so images that were stored on it are also copied onto the digital Wallet.

Peace of mind is a wonderful thing! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
samdring
Senior Member
Avatar
392 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Crooked Spire, Derbyshire
     
Jan 20, 2004 07:53 |  #13

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
Do they make a CD-burner that will copy a CF card at the touch of a button?

Yup - have used Apacer Disc Steno for about 4/5 months now
At home sits on PC desk and fresh images on CF card straight to CD before loading to computer (which has a bloke in front of it who 9 times out of ten beggers up originals)
Brilliant in the field - CF card in - one touch - copied

Has meant that I only use 512Mb cards cos fit nicely to one CD


Have a Care
Sam

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VicGlass
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Jan 20, 2004 08:44 |  #14

X-Drive is better than sliced bread, and cheap.

I have an X-Drive with a 40 GB drive, bought for about $240. It is bare bones which is what I wanted. Works like a charm. so what if it doesn't indicate how full the drive is? You'll have to shoot 400 10GB RAW shots a day during a ten day vacation to run out of space. If you generally shoot more than 400 RAW pics a day, then just get a 60 or 80GB drive instead! For portable storage this is one of most economical solutions, and it works!

I bought my X-Drive II at InsideComputer Digital Store, and I would recommend them.

Good luck!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evilenglishman
Goldmember
1,184 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2003
     
Jan 20, 2004 09:24 |  #15

--


Click here to view and/or sign the petition (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,801 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Portable CD Burner or Digital Wallet???
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1202 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.