Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 06 Nov 2006 (Monday) 13:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photoshop question.. Photo included

 
Lin-z
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 13:19 |  #1

I did a Christmas card session for some friends this weekend. I will be shooting their wedding next year but they want something that I can't offer right now. They are interested in having their engagement session done in a studio they want the type of photo where they dress formal and one of them sits in a leather chair and the other stands behind. You know what look I am talking about. I can't do it because I dont' have a studio.

We decided to play around with the idea and see how it would look outside and see how they looked so dressed up. So they dressed up and we took "practice" pictures.

I might not be using the right words here, but I was wondering about these digital backdrops I have been hearing about. Could it be used in this image.

I was wondering if any one would like to take a stab at making this image look more "studio like". The main reason they need this image is because in their family's home their parents all have large framed portraits of all of the children's engagement. So they need one to match.

I am adding a few images so you guys can pick the best to play with.

Thanks to everyone!

IMAGE: http://Lindsi.smugmug.com/photos/108466686-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://Lindsi.smugmug.com/photos/108465693-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://Lindsi.smugmug.com/photos/108463900-M.jpg

http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfig
we over look the simplest things
Avatar
3,275 posts
Likes: 85
Joined May 2005
Location: Fremont, California USA
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:22 |  #2

This environmental portraits can still work. But you need to get a plain background. Can you do this again where the background is closer to one solid color?


5D | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | Sony A6000 2-Lens Kit | SEL35 1.8 | EF 50 1.8 on NEX as my 75mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DWFotos
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New York, NY
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:23 |  #3

I'm sure others will probably have a better idea, but you can do two things I can think of off the top of my head. You can paint the background in photoshop. It shouldn't be to bad, just a little tedious. You can also just buy a cheap white or black sheet to use as a make shift backdrop for next time.


David
Gear List
DWFotos (external link)
flickr (external link)

_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lin-z
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:23 |  #4

I could. I did it in this location because there was a bench they could sit on.


http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JMHPhotography
Goldmember
Avatar
4,784 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: New Hampshire
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:24 |  #5

The digital backgrounds you talk about are called chromakey. You shoot the subject on an evenly lit blue or green screen and through software, you can take every pixel that has this color value and use it as a selection to paste in a digital background. To use a background as you see here for this is a fair bit more difficult. You'd have to use either the extraction tool or do some manual selection. This takes a lot of time to do it without it looking obvious even to an untrained eye. I personally HATE digital backgrounds because they almost never look right to me. Maybe I've only seen very bad ones, but the lighting always falls on a background in a certain way, and if the lighting pattern on the subject isn't consistant with the digital background... I can see it.


~John

(aka forkball)
Have a peek into my Gearbag. and My flickr (external link)
editing of my photos by permission only. Thanks

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lin-z
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:24 |  #6

Well they don't want white. They want like bluesish, greyish something..


http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lin-z
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:27 |  #7

forkball wrote in post #2225294 (external link)
The digital backgrounds you talk about are called chromakey. You shoot the subject on an evenly lit blue or green screen and through software, you can take every pixel that has this color value and use it as a selection to paste in a digital background. To use a background as you see here for this is a fair bit more difficult. You'd have to use either the extraction tool or do some manual selection. This takes a lot of time to do it without it looking obvious even to an untrained eye. I personally HATE digital backgrounds because they almost never look right to me. Maybe I've only seen very bad ones, but the lighting always falls on a background in a certain way, and if the lighting pattern on the subject isn't consistant with the digital background... I can see it.

Really. I agree alot of the digital backgrounds I have seen do look really fake. I just thought that MAYBE it could work for this one... Thanks though


http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lin-z
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:28 |  #8

The couple is thinking about getting an artist to do an oil painting of them this way. Do you think this would be go enough? Then the artist could just paint in the background?


http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D. ­ Craig ­ Flory
Goldmember
1,333 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:41 as a reply to  @ DWFotos's post |  #9

Since the images are so small, not a lot could be done but I am posting a version to show you possiblities.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
ASP // loryphotog@mindspring.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DWFotos
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New York, NY
     
Nov 06, 2006 14:54 |  #10

I personally think the pictures look nice. You can blur the background some, or even desaturate it.

Edit: like flory did. The framing helps too.


David
Gear List
DWFotos (external link)
flickr (external link)

_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
galilee
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
15 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Nov 06, 2006 15:35 |  #11

This is a quick chromakey extraction, it could've been done more detailed but I did it to show a quik example (took 1min for extraction)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


ian joubert
"don't put your faith in equipment or humans, but rather in the creative abilities God gave you..."
Canon 5D, Canon 20D,EFL 24-105 f4, EFL 17-40 f4.0, EFL 70-200 f2.8, EFL 24-70 f2.8, EF 50 f1.8, EF 100 makro f2.8, WFT-E2, 430Ex, 580Ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lin-z
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,247 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: GA
     
Nov 06, 2006 15:38 |  #12

This is good. i like it.


http://www.lindsi.com (external link)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eyelikedurt
Senior Member
Avatar
716 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Sheffield, UK
     
Nov 06, 2006 16:15 |  #13

galilee, could you provide a bit more information about this technique? i have a few shots that could benefit, but ive no idea how to do what youve done.


In this house we obey the law of thermodynamics!!

Gear: 5D MKii w/grip | 18-55 Canon | 55-200 Canon(ancient) | 50mm 1.8 Canon | 10-22mm Canon (for sale!)| Sigma 24-70 2.8 EX | 24-105L Canon | 430Ex Speedlite |
www.markandrewphotogra​phy.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JMHPhotography
Goldmember
Avatar
4,784 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: New Hampshire
     
Nov 06, 2006 16:30 |  #14

galilee: I'm guessing that the top is the after since the bottom is a nice shade of chromakey green...lol.

Eyelikedurt: It's a simple process really. You shoot your subject against an evenly lit background. The common colors are CK-Blue and CK-Green. Mainly because these shades never appear in skin and hair so it's easier to isolate. The trick is to make sure the subjects don't wear anything with the colors of your background in it. Red and yellow shades aren't used because these colors can be found in trace amounts in both hair and skin tones. Not so easy to isolate later.

Once you have your pictures, in photoshop or other editing software that uses a color based selection method... you select the color of the background and use it to pop in a new background. Shouldn't take more than a minute if that.


~John

(aka forkball)
Have a peek into my Gearbag. and My flickr (external link)
editing of my photos by permission only. Thanks

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ayotnoms
Perfect Anti-Cloning Argument
Avatar
2,988 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
     
Nov 06, 2006 17:55 |  #15

First off, you have a handsome couple to work with. :)
I thought it could be done as you see here:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

...however, you inevitably see that the image has been knocked out from the original background. So I have to go with John (aka Forkball) on the digital backgrounds.

...to say nothing of the time involved. Good luck with whatever you decide to do.

Cheers!

Steve
[URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=1267612&postcou​nt=17"]Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,139 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Photoshop question.. Photo included
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2936 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.