ScruffyJohn Senior Member 287 posts Joined Sep 2005 Location: Longmont, Colorado More info | Nov 07, 2006 10:22 | #1 can't decide which is better (if either), comments? I'm getting various comments kind of splitting the vote, so I thought I'd post here and get your expert eyes.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EoSD30fReAk Goldmember  2,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Netherlands More info | Nov 07, 2006 12:36 | #2 i like #2 better. Photography is my way to relax
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rudgej Couch-potato photographer 5,613 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Nov 07, 2006 14:08 | #3 #2. It's stronger compositionally.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stupot Goldmember 2,227 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks More info | Nov 07, 2006 14:11 | #4 definately 2 for the reason above Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 07, 2006 14:27 | #5 3 out of 3 (so far), ok would a tighter crop be better? like  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sugarzebra Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 07, 2006 14:31 | #6 Two & three are OK with me, but the blue 'distraction' in the third should be removed and perhaps the white object in the planter. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EoSD30fReAk Goldmember 2,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Netherlands More info | still like #2 the best, the leafs are pretty important for the feel in the 2nd shot IMO. Photography is my way to relax
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saralonde Goldmember 1,019 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Nov 07, 2006 14:41 | #8 #2 is the best.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
slacker Senior Member  363 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Portland, Oregon More info | Nov 07, 2006 15:10 | #9 another vote for #2... 40D, 30D, 16-35L, 24-70L, 24 1.4L, 50 1.4, 70-200L, 100-400L, 430EX, G9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 07, 2006 17:01 | #10 thank you everyone for providing input... it's the ONLY fall shot I got this year... kind of got behind... so I was kind of hope salvage this one if I could.... if you think #3 would be btter than #2 if I saturated the yellows & cloned out the blue, let me know, otherwise I'll stick with #2 John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JT Goldmember  2,224 posts Likes: 17 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Grand Rapids, MI More info | Nov 07, 2006 20:13 | #11 Definitely #2. #3 is too centered and close and doesn't work as well as #2, composition wise. - 5D & 60D (x2), EFS 10-22, EF 17-40L, EF 50 f1.4, EF 24-105L, EF 100-400 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2747 guests, 166 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
