Can someone tell me if the distortion is the same on the Canon 17-40 as it is on the Canon 17-85?
Silly question, i know, but i was just curious.
Thanks
surfologist Senior Member 999 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Florida More info | Nov 07, 2006 15:36 | #1 Can someone tell me if the distortion is the same on the Canon 17-40 as it is on the Canon 17-85? My! Gear! Bag!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
h0rde Senior Member 506 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | Nov 07, 2006 17:47 | #2 If you mean barrel/pincushion distortion, I believe that varies from lens to lens. Olympus OM-D E-M1 mkII | 7-14mm f/2.8 | 12-100mm f/4 | 40-150mm f/2.8 | 25mm f/1.2 | 20mm f/1.7 | Lensbaby Velvet 56 | Lensbaby Burnside 35 (Canon EOS mount) | Zeiss 25mm f/2 (Canon EOS mount) | (Formerly Canon 5DC, 40D, 5D2...)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Nov 07, 2006 18:26 | #3 varies from lens to lens, even with the same focal legths. im fairly certain though that the 17-85 will have MORE distortion though. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember 1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Nov 07, 2006 22:08 | #4 On a crop? I don't notice much distortion, if any. I mean, there's a litte near the edges at 17mm. But nothing appalling. --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Choderboy I like a long knob More info | Generally it's not too bad. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tsaraleksi Goldmember 1,653 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2006 Location: Greencastle/Lafayette Indiana, USA More info | Nov 08, 2006 00:06 | #7 Oh, I forgot- there is a bit of corner distortion at 17mm. --Alex Editorial Portfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2006 10:56 | #8 That site shows the 17-40 to have less distortion on the wide end.... And the average sharpness is not too bad as compared to stopping down... My! Gear! Bag!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2006 12:07 | #9 You're welcome. Bear in mind that it's only one source of tests, but I still find it to be a useful site.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 08, 2006 13:14 | #10 Rumjungle wrote in post #2234901 You're welcome. Bear in mind that it's only one source of tests, but I still find it to be a useful site. I have seen that site before, but lost it... I think it is one of the best... the reviews and information i have read benefited me My! Gear! Bag!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2925 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||