300mm f4 lens ?

ok.. I have a Canon 70-300 f4 lens now.

Question is, is the Tamron or Sigma 70-300 f4 better?

Also am looking into getting a 200 f2.8 lens, whisch is best there, sigma, Canon or Tamron?

So 2 questions I quess.....

Thanks guys...

This will be on my NEW 20D thats on the way...

wooohooo cant wait to get it....

Are you looking to get the prime 200/2.8 or a zoom that cover 200 lenght?

The 200/2.8 is a great lens, light weight, fast USM and very sharp.

But if you're looking for the 70-300 range range, then the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro is a good one. The Canon 70-300 IS is nicer but costs alot more.

70-200 2.8 is what I am looking for, just curious which of the brands is best in that lens, I have the standard canon 70-300 f4 now and I was curious if the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro is better?

Thanks

You are going to be hard pressed to find a brand X lens that is better than a Canon lens...with the exception of the very bottom of the line. Sigmas sound like demented chainsaws when they focus.

cbr929rrerion wrote in post #2233131
70-200 2.8 is what I am looking for, just curious which of the brands is best in that lens, I have the standard canon 70-300 f4 now and I was curious if the Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro is better?

Thanks

all are great lens, the Canon 70-200 2.8L is one sexy piece of ars, i kinda wich I would have got it instead of my 28-105 f4L. My vote is for the L