Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 08 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 10:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Shots of Children - anyone know the law?

 
ukhamsterclub
Member
Avatar
111 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Aug 2006
     
Nov 08, 2006 10:36 |  #1

Need a bit of a quick answer here if possible but if you were to take photo's of children at a swimming gala as an official photographer, where do you stand with regard to selling photographs after the event, are there any laws that a photographer maybe breaking?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dandaman_24
Senior Member
Avatar
935 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Location: S Wales UK
     
Nov 08, 2006 12:04 |  #2

I was going to photograph swim competition last year, i had to have a CRB check in advance of the competition. I would ask if this is needed where you are photographing, just incase you get left hanging on the day. On the day ask the PA guy to announce if any parent does not wish to have their childs photograph taken let it be known to the officials, who will then make it clear to you who not ot photograph. hope it helps


Canon 1DMKIIN - 1D - 17-35mm - 24 -70mm - 70-200mm - 580EX - Macbook

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Nov 08, 2006 12:21 |  #3

ukhamsterclub wrote in post #2234546 (external link)
Need a bit of a quick answer here if possible but if you were to take photo's of children at a swimming gala as an official photographer, where do you stand with regard to selling photographs after the event, are there any laws that a photographer maybe breaking?

Anything you do as an official photographer, you abide by the rules of the organisers who appointed you, surely? It depends on the arrangements you made with them, if you aren't sure then they are the people to ask.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZinZin
Junior Member
23 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: London, Uk
     
Nov 08, 2006 15:56 |  #4

Sandpiper is right....you're responsible to the organisers and you need to be guided by them. And I think you've actually raised two questions here - the right to photograph and the right to sell. You have the right to take photos as the official photog, and the organisers will probably have made consent to photograph a condition of entry for all children, but check that they have. When I've done similar events, if consent is not given, then the child does not enter. Making an announcement on the day will only complicate matters since it not only becomes unworkable but you will have difficulty verifying whether a person has the right to withdraw or give consent on the spot, and that will open a whole new can of worms. And what will you do if somebody claims that they didn't hear the announcement and so gave no permission for you to photograph their child? Or if Dad says yes and Mum says no?

Secondly, if you do sell photos later, then you won't be breaking any criminal laws (providing that you're not doing anything untoward or obviously illegal with them, either on your own or through a third person) because you were entitled to take them, having been appointed and so approved, and by having the required consent. That doesn't change. What might change though, is what you can do with them because they were taken for and on behalf of the organisers.....and so it goes back to you needing to establish what their take is on it.

What I would say to you though - and I speak as somebody who has been in exactly this position - is that having done all you can to check and double check, if you've still got any doubts at all, steer clear. Is it really worth enduring the sort of potential aggravation this could cause just to sell a few photos? Hope it works out for you.

Regards

Zin Zin




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
marcusg6@bigpond.net.au
Senior Member
Avatar
319 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Maroubra Beach, Sydney, Australia
     
Nov 08, 2006 17:18 |  #5

Depends on what country you are in, or what state. Here is Australia you can photograpgh anything or anybody you want, as long as you do not use the picture to advertise a product. Most people think that cameras are banned from beaches and pools etc, but it is a myth. All the laws were dumped when presented in parliament.


Canon 7D
70-200mm f2.8 Canon
Canon 50mm f1.8
Canon 10-22mm
http://www.marcusgreig​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dsmithla
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Nov 08, 2006 21:36 |  #6

Don't know about the law, but I can tell you this, you will almost certainly not be allowed to use flash until after the start of each heat. The reason is simply that the starting system uses a strobe, very similar to what is on your camera (the less expensive start systems actually have a camera flash in them) and the swimmers and timers will invariably mistake your camera flash for the start signal.

If you make clear to the referee that you you are tripping your flash only upon HEARING the start signal (there is also an audible start signal that sounds upon start), you should have no problems (since sound travels way slower than light, waiting for the sound keeps you clear of the light signal). And yes, it is a measurable difference even at only 12.5 to 25 yds.

David S.
USA Swimming (Referee, Retired).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ABrownPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
4,676 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2006
Location: SoCaL
     
Nov 09, 2006 01:13 |  #7

marcusg6@bigpond.net.a​u wrote in post #2236194 (external link)
Depends on what country you are in, or what state. Here is Australia you can photograpgh anything or anybody you want, as long as you do not use the picture to advertise a product. Most people think that cameras are banned from beaches and pools etc, but it is a myth. All the laws were dumped when presented in parliament.

Same rules apply to the USA! Anyone is free to photograph anyone, regardless of their permission. As i am sure everyone has seen, all those PAPARAZZI moments where people get fed up with the photographers in their faces.... then again Celebrities play by different rules :)

Although permission isn't needed, my feelings lean towards recieving permission in advance anyway, as to not create drama or anything ;)

Edit: I wanted to add that especially in public areas, is it acceptable to photograph anyone you choose, as long as it isn't for commercial purposes!


He still has one more move.

ABrownPhoto.com (external link) | Full Gear List
Canon 6D | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | Yongnuo YN600EX-RT (x3)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ukhamsterclub
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
111 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Aug 2006
     
Nov 09, 2006 01:52 as a reply to  @ ABrownPhoto's post |  #8

Thanks all, I was fairly sure I knew the position but you have all confirmed it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pxl8
Goldmember
Avatar
1,108 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 119
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Somerset, UK
     
Nov 09, 2006 10:02 |  #9

There's a comprehensive guide here:

http://www.sirimo.co.u​k …hotographers_ri​ghts_guide (external link)

Also read through the comments which provide a lot more information.


-- PXL8
1DmkIV, 5DmkIII + 135mm f/2L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, Sigma 35mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gmen
Goldmember
Avatar
4,345 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Essex
     
Nov 10, 2006 03:02 |  #10

http://www.thecpsu.org​.uk …s=Left&Menu=234​6&Sel=0304 (external link)

---- Gavin


TGSPhoto Editorial Sports Photography (external link) | TGS Blog (external link) | TGS Twitter (external link) | TGS Sportsshooter (external link) | TGS Tweets (external link) | TGS Facebook (external link) | LinkedIn (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,249 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Shots of Children - anyone know the law?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2293 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.