Does anyone have any experience with both? Ive heard that Tamrons have a reverse zoom turny thing than Canon lenses? or was that Sigma?
let me know
thanks
79TAKid Senior Member  351 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: St.louis, MO More info | Nov 08, 2006 10:49 | #1 Does anyone have any experience with both? Ive heard that Tamrons have a reverse zoom turny thing than Canon lenses? or was that Sigma? Aaron Hagen www.HagenRacing.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2006 10:20 | #2 ttt Aaron Hagen www.HagenRacing.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillMarks Senior Member 525 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 More info | Nov 10, 2006 21:46 | #3 I don't have that lens, but I have both brands in the 28 -300 (one canon mount, one Minolta mount). I have noticed no difference between the two.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liza Cream of the Crop 11,386 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Mayberry More info | Nov 10, 2006 22:00 | #4  Permanent banIt's my understanding that the Sigma is much better in terms of image quality. And it's the Sigma that's reverse engineered.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2305 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
