Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 08 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 16:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need advice on studio equipment.

 
MikeMcL
Goldmember
Avatar
1,411 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Dayton Ohio
     
Nov 09, 2006 02:11 |  #16

where do alienbees fit into this hierarchy of quality. they are very common among pros and enthusiasts, and sell almost instantly on the used market... are they "kid toys" or are they a step above.

they have a good reputation, i was just wondering from some of you who are more judgemental of "pro quality"

thanks. i dont mean to hijack the thread, but i think it applies, as AB's are value light kits in your price range as well. You can get a really nice AB kit for $1600.00


350d, 5d, 28-70L, 70-200L, 430EX,
50 1.8, 85 1.8 - full alienbees studio set.

MikeMcLane.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 09, 2006 09:03 |  #17

Alien Bees are more than 'kid toys' but not quite 'serious pro gear'. Some broad generalizations...

The 'kid toys' are really cheap, really low (50-200) watt-second rating, really low output modelling watt (60-100w) with no aftermarket accessory sources except original mfg with a few light modifiers.


The 'serious pro gear' are sturdy, 500-2400 watt-second, >200w modelling lights with many aftermarket accessory sources with broad spectrum of light modifiers.

The 'in between' (for hobbyists and weekend warriors or those on limited budgets) are adequately built, 150-1500 watt-second, 100w modelling lights with some aftermarket accessory sources but usually from same mfg as flash.

White Lightning and Alien Bee have a large group of supporters, and they are a respectable product.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vwpilot
Senior Member
Avatar
592 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
     
Nov 09, 2006 12:01 |  #18

Bees arent bad lights, but I would never consider them if I were using them for a business. I dont like their build quality, I dont like their modeling lights, and they are extremely inefficient. They should put out a lot more light for their w/s ratings. I've also heard the light isnt quite as consistent as other nicer brands (as in exposures and WB can change slightly) but havent used them enough to really judge that.

I'd recommend them for someone who is not a pro or planning on it, might use their lights once or twice a month but want something more than the most bargain basement system.

White Lightings are far better though when it comes to quality and output, but there you start to aproach the prices of other lighting systems so it opens up more choices to you. There really isnt much in the AB category except some of the other house brand systems from Adorama and such.

For my first kit I was between a Dynalit pack kit and that Hensel kit I posted earlier and was really leaning toward the Hensel for its price. Then I got a good deal (though still twice the price of the Hensel kit) on a slightly used Profoto Acute system so I went with that.


Jim Sykes
SportsShooter portfolio (external link)
SpeedArena (external link)
Jim Sykes Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,793 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Mercer Island, WA
     
Nov 09, 2006 15:55 |  #19
bannedPermanent ban

You're here too? Crazy. Viper says <3 OT

vwpilot wrote in post #2239624 (external link)
White Lightings are far better though when it comes to quality and output, but there you start to aproach the prices of other lighting systems so it opens up more choices to you.

white lighting are ok, just the Ab's big brother. Big advatage with either is the replacement bulb/flash tube costs. Considerably cheeper than other brands


Photographic Resources (external link) || International Photo Journalist (external link)

Blog (external link)

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vwpilot
Senior Member
Avatar
592 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
     
Nov 09, 2006 16:46 |  #20

Hey, yeah, here too.

White Lightings I think are built far better than the AB though. And they have a better modeling light.

But at that price I would start to consider other systems, such as the Hensel above.


Jim Sykes
SportsShooter portfolio (external link)
SpeedArena (external link)
Jim Sykes Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Nov 09, 2006 18:33 |  #21

The bees are to the pro lights, like Schwartzeneger is to an oscar.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,472 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4574
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 09, 2006 20:09 |  #22

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #2241016 (external link)
The bees are to the pro lights, like Schwartzeneger is to an oscar.

His name is Arnold, not Oscar! ;)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Nov 09, 2006 22:43 |  #23

I've got to tell you I owned nearly all the systems currently out there ( I used to run a rental department) and I really like the Paul Buff stuff. I have 5 and in 15 years have only had one issue, sent it to TN and turned it around in 3 days door to door.

I had speedos and Norman, they exploded and so I got rid of them. I favor monoblocks over packs, any way. If your powerack goes out so goes all your lights. With the blocks if one goes out the others still work.

I agree with tht others that Novatron is rookie stuff. I buy used all the time, to save money. If it needs repair, I send it back to PCB and they fix it. Please, Please get some good solid C stands for your garage. Use sand bag all the time too.

Get something you can grow with. There are no 2000 WS Nova packs. Like you said it is an INVESTMENT.

I hope this helps,

Les Baldwin


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,473 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Need advice on studio equipment.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1031 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.