Had my EF 28-135 IS recalibrated a couple weeks or so ago and finally got to a duck yesterday. C&C is appreciated. Thanks.
http://photography.dunnnet.com …displayimage.php?pos=-284
YosemiteJunkie Goldmember  1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Nov 09, 2006 02:10 | #1 Had my EF 28-135 IS recalibrated a couple weeks or so ago and finally got to a duck yesterday. C&C is appreciated. Thanks. Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
geofftelforduk Senior Member  317 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Northern Ireland More info | Nov 09, 2006 02:22 | #2 Nice shot!!! ---------------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimG I feel thoroughly satisfied  12,255 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Australia. More info | Nov 09, 2006 02:24 | #3 Nice.... certainly looks to be working well now Gear Listhttp://www.codastudios.com.au
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YosemiteJunkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Nov 09, 2006 02:34 | #4 Thanks guys. Now that it more up to par it hardly comes off the camera. At least until I can afford the 17-40 L. I'm actually enjoying using this lens now. Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EoSD30fReAk Goldmember  2,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Netherlands More info | very nice shot, now you can realy enjoy the lens. Photography is my way to relax
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimAskew Cream of the Crop  More info | Very, very nice shot. Looks tack sharp to me. Jim -- I keep the Leica D-Lux 7 in the Glove Box just in case!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rhinotherunt Looking for a Rock  7,129 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Jasper, AL More info | Nov 09, 2006 10:38 | #7 Nice! Looks TRACK sharp! Ryan McGill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 09, 2006 10:39 | #8 Hey Herb, mind telling what the cost for re-calibration was? I just had my 100-400L done, [$193 + shipping], and it's a whole different lens. I think my 28-135 needs it too. I like the lens, but now that I know what to look for, I see it's soft. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gregster Senior Member 395 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Ontario, Canada More info | Nov 09, 2006 10:48 | #9 canonloader wrote in post #2239322 Hey Herb, mind telling what the cost for re-calibration was? I just had my 100-400L done, [$193 + shipping], and it's a whole different lens. I think my 28-135 needs it too. I like the lens, but now that I know what to look for, I see it's soft. Was your 100-400 under warranty? R5 | RF14-35 - RF24-105 - RF100-500 - EF600II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop More info | Nov 09, 2006 11:02 | #10 Not even close. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
malla1962 Cream of the Crop  7,714 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2004 Location: Walney Island,cumbria,uk More info |
sadyrose Mostly Lurking 19 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Nashville, TN More info | Nov 09, 2006 12:04 | #12 It's beautiful! ~Melissa~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Great shot! I have been singing the praises of my 28-135, against the background of constant claims of softness. I am just glad that mine is sharp without having to have it recalibrated! Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YosemiteJunkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Nov 10, 2006 02:31 | #14 canonloader wrote in post #2239322 Hey Herb, mind telling what the cost for re-calibration was? I just had my 100-400L done, [$193 + shipping], and it's a whole different lens. I think my 28-135 needs it too. I like the lens, but now that I know what to look for, I see it's soft. Mine was under warranty so I signed it up on the Irvine Canon site then sent it in (Insured, for about $12 USD). 10 days later I had it back and so far seems to be doing what it was intended to do. Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
YosemiteJunkie THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,339 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Carrollton, GA More info | Nov 10, 2006 02:33 | #15 At first I thought it was just me not knowing how to use the IS but eventualy did a bit of testing of my own and found that it was also focusing about 2 inches in front of where the focus point was aimed. Happy Shooting, Herb
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2848 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
