gmwinder Senior Member 679 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Champaign, IL More info | Nov 09, 2006 06:17 | #1 From my trip to Arches NP in Moab, UT. Would have preferred some more clouds and a sunset to eliminate the shadow. They are the LaSal mtns in the background.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Lumix GX8 w/12-35 2.8 and 35-100 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
adebass Senior Member  873 posts Joined Mar 2005 Location: Glasgow, Scotland More info | Nov 09, 2006 06:54 | #2 Cracking looking place. what an amazing formation. Dr Adrian Bass (www.adrian-bass.fotopic.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mint_Sauce Senior Member 378 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2006 Location: Devon, UK More info | Nov 09, 2006 07:51 | #3 Nice pic, personally in that scenario I would have used the shadow as a feature. Framing the rock bottom right so the shadow is completely in the shot, showing a kind of symmetry along with the center of the pic showing the distance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dimitri_V Cream of the Crop  9,221 posts Joined Nov 2004 Location: Scotland More info | Nov 09, 2006 08:51 | #4  Permanent banMint_Sauce wrote in post #2238735  Nice pic, personally in that scenario I would have used the shadow as a feature. Framing the rock bottom right so the shadow is completely in the shot, showing a kind of symmetry along with the center of the pic showing the distance. Thats a clever idea,and i suppose a CP or nd grad filter would help with the sky to bring out the nice blue. My site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Buggbairn Goldmember  2,374 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Falkirk Scotland More info | Nov 09, 2006 09:00 | #5 I agree it's a great shot at a wonderful location
LOG IN TO REPLY |
montreal Goldmember  1,194 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Trondheim, Norway More info | Nov 09, 2006 13:04 | #6 You did well considering the harsh lighting. I agree with Mint_Sauce's suggestion and I also thing that a CP would have helped with the sky (although I believe the effect of a polarizer would be much stronger to the left of the frame because of the position of the sun). 5D - 17-40L, 70-200L f4, 50 f1.4, PowerShot A430
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gmwinder THREAD STARTER Senior Member 679 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Champaign, IL More info | Nov 09, 2006 19:50 | #7 OK...took the suggestions and left the shadow in...I agree it does need the CP and the with the shadow in makes more sense. Gives me a reason to go back!  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Lumix GX8 w/12-35 2.8 and 35-100 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Elisabeth-Ann Goldmember  2,360 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Nassau, Bahamas More info | Nov 09, 2006 19:56 | #8 Amazing place - great photo, I like the first one best. Twelve significant photographs in any one year is a good crop. -Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sparker1 Cream of the Crop  29,368 posts Likes: 295 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Sierra Vista, AZ More info | Nov 09, 2006 20:39 | #9 Well, it goes without saying, I really like Delicate Arch. (Mine has been PhotoChopped, of course.) I enjoy going there for sunset, but you got a very nice shot. Love the full shadow. Stan (See my gallery at http://www.pbase.com/sparker1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2823 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
