One of the pics from todays test, its only my second time with studio lights. I have more to post but they need to go in the glamour section and I havent got access yet.
Anyway let me know what you think.
cdmonkey Goldmember 1,819 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2006 Location: Shropshire UK More info | Nov 09, 2006 18:01 | #1 One of the pics from todays test, its only my second time with studio lights. I have more to post but they need to go in the glamour section and I havent got access yet. www.carldavisphoto.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.CraigFlory Goldmember 1,333 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Nov 09, 2006 18:19 | #2 It is lit well as to brightness. But it would have beem more flattering for her if you had lit her using a short light pattern instead of broad lighting. Judging by two catch lights above each other in her eyes, it looks like your form fill light is in line with your key light. Try moving the key light at a 45º angle instead. When all done ... is is usually best to take out all but one catch light in each eye. You are on the right track. Once you get lighting down, color balance will get easier then. D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sam Goldmember More info | Nov 09, 2006 19:54 | #3 There are secret ways to get into the Glamor section, but I'm no mod so I can't help you there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2006 02:17 | #4 Thanks for the comments, I agree with the comments on the lights, I have another one which i will post later where the lighting is different, this light setup worked best for the full body shots, hoepfully i will be able to post them soon so that I can get feedback on them. www.carldavisphoto.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rumrunner Goldmember 1,865 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: El Paso, Texas More info | Nov 10, 2006 02:48 | #5 Very nice except for one thing. It's a little akward how the background is so lit, but the midtones in her hair go dark so quick, it just seems like she should be against a darker backround..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rumrunner, thanks for the comments, your right about the background, here is one of the other pics where i changed the lights for a head shot although the catch lights were in the wrong place. www.carldavisphoto.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.CraigFlory Goldmember 1,333 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | Now you have it. You used short lighting and got a very nice image. D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thrumyeye Senior Member 299 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Minnesota More info | Nov 10, 2006 13:56 | #8 if you had lit her using a short light pattern instead of broad lighting You used short lighting and got a very nice image. Flory - would you be willing to elaborate on the short vs broad lighting setup/perspective for an amateur interested in learning? Elaine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
D.CraigFlory Goldmember 1,333 posts Joined Sep 2006 More info | If a face is turned to their right (our left as we view it) and you light it from the side with more face showing ... that is broad lighting. If lit from the side with less face showing ... that's short lighting. Both have value. If someone has a slim face, then broad lighting can be good. If someone has a average to a more full face, then short lighting is better. D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elcuartoscuro Member 213 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Buenos Aires . Argentina More info | Nov 10, 2006 15:34 | #10 D. Craig Flory wrote in post #2240966 It is lit well as to brightness. But it would have beem more flattering for her if you had lit her using a short light pattern instead of broad lighting. Judging by two catch lights above each other in her eyes, it looks like your form fill light is in line with your key light. Try moving the key light at a 45º angle instead. When all done ... is is usually best to take out all but one catch light in each eye. You are on the right track. Once you get lighting down, color balance will get easier then. ditto **elcuartoscuro**
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thrumyeye Senior Member 299 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Minnesota More info | Nov 10, 2006 20:50 | #11 Thanks Flory - very well-explained. I appreciate it! Elaine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hellashot Goldmember 4,617 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2004 Location: USA More info | Nov 10, 2006 21:30 | #12 Permanent bancdmonkey wrote in post #2240894 One of the pics from todays test, its only my second time with studio lights. I have more to post but they need to go in the glamour section and I havent got access yet. Anyway let me know what you think. The picture is far too red - adjust your levels. 5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2837 guests, 135 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||