I know this may seem like a dumb question to most of you, but I really don't know. I read posts saying there's noise on pictures, then someone comes and fixes it, and I still didn't get it. Anyone mind explaining to me? Thanks
tania622 Senior Member 604 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: NY More info | Nov 10, 2006 16:18 | #1 I know this may seem like a dumb question to most of you, but I really don't know. I read posts saying there's noise on pictures, then someone comes and fixes it, and I still didn't get it. Anyone mind explaining to me? Thanks Tania
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonaldS.Jr. Prodigal "Brick" Layer More info | Nov 10, 2006 16:20 | #2 colored or white speckles, grain, etc. Makes for a "noisy" picture. Take a shot at ISO 100. Then take a shot at ISO 1600. zoom in a bit, and note the difference. The difference is the amount of "noise". Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saravrose "I quit smoking dope" 9,562 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Between here and there More info | Nov 10, 2006 16:24 | #3 side effect of high ISO's and incorrect exposures.. looks like grain on film shots.. Canon 30D BG_E2 Grip Rebel XT BG-E3 battery grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 10, 2006 16:38 | #4 Thanks Tania
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CRE@TE Goldmember 1,676 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada More info | Nov 10, 2006 16:54 | #5 Hope you can see the difference in this photo. Left side at ISO 1600, right side ISO 100. I got stuff for taking pictures. :o When things are unclear - It's time to refocus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,737 posts Likes: 4070 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Nov 10, 2006 17:19 | #6 Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2244868 Then take a shot at ISO 1600. zoom in a bit, and note the difference. The difference is the amount of "noise". Or better yet, take any P/S camera, the fancier, the better, and take a pic at the highest ISO possible with poor lighting. I loved my old Nikon 8700 and at ISO 100 or below it took fabulous pics. But crank it to 400 and it looked like a sand painting. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saravrose "I quit smoking dope" 9,562 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Between here and there More info | Nov 10, 2006 17:27 | #7 gjl711 wrote in post #2245097 Or better yet, take any P/S camera, the fancier, the better, and take a pic at the highest ISO possible with poor lighting. I loved my old Nikon 8700 and at ISO 100 or below it took fabulous pics. But crank it to 400 and it looked like a sand painting. sand painting I like that... my niece calls noisy pictures 'dirty'... Canon 30D BG_E2 Grip Rebel XT BG-E3 battery grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 12, 2006 18:30 | #8 Thanks, the picture really helps a lot Tania
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,091 posts Likes: 45 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Nov 12, 2006 18:33 | #9 300% is extreme and introduces other issues like pixelation. 100% views are plenty big to see noise. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberPet Hiding Under a Rock 4,052 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Piteå, Sweden More info | Nov 12, 2006 18:42 | #10 Noise: Hubby snoring on the couch while you try to watch tv? Noo... OK /Petra Hall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2278 guests, 125 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||