Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Nov 2006 (Saturday) 12:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

This 24-70mmL is pissing me off. :(

 
Jackal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 11, 2006 12:22 |  #1

Well, I've sent this thing to Canon twice and haven't seen one bit of a difference in the way it focuses.

It is backfocusing a bit on the extreme side at F2.8 on the wide end of the zoom range. Canon told me that if it's still not fixed to send the camera in with the lens.

The thing is I can't send my camera in because I need it for work.

I tested the L against my Tamron and 50mm 1.4 and here are the photos. None of the others had any back focus issues at all. It was too bright to point the 1.4 at bright sunlight so I took a shot of something that was a good distance away. Look how sharp my 50 is at 1.4.... =)

It's not just at a distance either. If I shoot a subject that's 8 feet away at 24mm/F2.8 it will focus on the background 90% of the time. Rarely will it lock onto the person's face.

These tests rule out my camera right? I mean my camera focuses damn perfect at 1.4 and doesn't have the same problem with my Tamron. Do I tell canon to shut up and send the lens again and demand they change it for another or what?

Canon 24-70mm @ 28mm F2.8 (external link)
Canon 24-70mm @ 35mm F2.8 (external link)
Tamron 28-75mm @ 28mm F2.8 (external link)
Canon 50mm 1.4 @ F1.4 (external link)

In case you kill that hosting here's the backup links:
Canon 24-70mm @ 28mm F2.8 (external link)
Canon 24-70mm @ 35mm F2.8 (external link)
Tamron 28-75mm @ 28mm F2.8 (external link)
Canon 50mm 1.4 @ F1.4 (external link)


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Nov 11, 2006 12:40 |  #2

So if you use the center focus point and focus right on someone's face, it'll focus past the person and beep and confirm a focus lock?


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,481 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Nov 11, 2006 12:42 |  #3

I don't see anything in focus with the link to the 50. I understand that it's 1.4, but I still see nothing sharp-ish. The Tamron definitely looks better, but let me ask you this. The focus in every one of those shots looks off. Are you quite certain your camera isn't backfocusing?


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jackal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 11, 2006 12:54 |  #4

The 50mm shot is in focus. It's just "soft" at 1.4. The full shot shows tremendous bokeh with only the label of the propane tank in focus.

Now, I've been experimenting with the size of the actual AF sensor area around the middle focus point and discovered that it's really freaken big... I drew a diagram. If any contrast area (like the red strip of the canon lens box) touches the red lines it will snap into focus. The focus sensor seems to be ALOT larger than the little box. Do you think this area is too big when shooting a far away subject that's smaller than the area? Could it be locking focus onto the more contrasty foliage in the background?

I tested this lens out in a controlled environment at the studio with plane white background and a bunch of boxes and it would focus more accurately than it did in these tests. But those aren't real world scenarios.

Is it just that 20D/30D focusing sucks? My Tamron didn't have these problems though that's the thing.

I do notice this problem when using the lens "in the real world" and never with the Tamron after a year of having it.

I'm seriously confused now. Thoughts?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deadpass
Goldmember
Avatar
3,353 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: phoenix, az
     
Nov 11, 2006 15:13 |  #5

Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2248321 (external link)
I don't see anything in focus with the link to the 50. I understand that it's 1.4, but I still see nothing sharp-ish. The Tamron definitely looks better, but let me ask you this. The focus in every one of those shots looks off. Are you quite certain your camera isn't backfocusing?


I think a bit of the tire in the 50mm shot is in focus, but I can't tell for sure. It probably would've been better to take the same pic with the 50 as the other lenses. Those 24-70 shots are definately back focused, but it's hard to say what is causing it.


a camera
http://www.deadpass.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ W
Canon Fanosapien
Avatar
12,749 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee
     
Nov 11, 2006 15:21 |  #6

deadpass wrote in post #2248741 (external link)
I think a bit of the tire in the 50mm shot is in focus, but I can't tell for sure. It probably would've been better to take the same pic with the 50 as the other lenses. Those 24-70 shots are definately back focused, but it's hard to say what is causing it.


They look as though they are focused on the leaves back behind the box, rather than the box.


Tom
5D IV, M5, RP, & various lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Nov 11, 2006 15:53 |  #7

Jackal wrote in post #2248356 (external link)
I do notice this problem when using the lens "in the real world" and never with the Tamron after a year of having it.

Why did you change then out of curiosity? FTM? USM?

I will say, judging by your pics, it needs to go back to Canon again I think...


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NordieBoy
Goldmember
Avatar
2,635 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Nelson NZ
     
Nov 11, 2006 16:45 |  #8

Tom W wrote in post #2248764 (external link)
They look as though they are focused on the leaves back behind the box, rather than the box.

Yep.
A severe case of "leaf focus" there.


Fran
:):):)

(The life (and death (and life)) of Nifty (external link))

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jackal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 11, 2006 16:51 |  #9

Ironically I "upgraded" to the L so I can get faster and better focusing. I shoot weddings and important events and my Tamron fails in comparison to the speed and quietness of L USM.

I've tested the lens out more today and it's ridiculous. It's being sent back to canon ASAP. I will tell them not to bother sending it back if they didn't test it for focus on subjects 10ft away or more. Pointing this at a chart might show "within specs back focusing" but when shooting further subjects this turns into literally focusing 30ft behind the subject. Also, this is a problem on the WIDE end of the zoom range....not at 70mm. The more you zoom out the worse it gets.

None of my other lenses do this so it cannot be my camera.

I can't even get the thing in focus at 24mm or 28mm on a subject that's 10 feet away if I use F4 or F5.6! Out of 10 tries 1 or 2 MIGHT be in focus.

The thing is I imagine them shooting a chart on a wall but not having any far background that shows it's obviously not focused on the chart but actually 30ft back.


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jra
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,568 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
     
Nov 11, 2006 16:58 |  #10

Interesting...I can't say that I've ever seen a lens get the focus off by that much. Hopefully you'll get it resolved soon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joegolf68
Goldmember
3,269 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento CA area
     
Nov 11, 2006 17:00 |  #11

Ronald S. Jr. wrote in post #2248321 (external link)
I don't see anything in focus with the link to the 50. I understand that it's 1.4, but I still see nothing sharp-ish. The Tamron definitely looks better, but let me ask you this. The focus in every one of those shots looks off. Are you quite certain your camera isn't backfocusing?

Ditto's, I was thinking exactly the same thing. None of them appear focused, but the Tamron is a little better.


Gear List
:D Peace be upon you :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jackal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 11, 2006 17:23 |  #12

Trust me the 1.4 focuses properly. I just shot a box with a ruler on the side. Focus is dead on with the 50mm. Never had any problems with my other lenses and they have been used since I've had my XT and now I have a 30D. As soon as I popped this 24-70 on for the first time I said "Uh oh...."


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RgB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,323 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Nov 11, 2006 17:36 |  #13

If you don't select the AF points you will never focus correctly, so it looks like user error as the leaves looked in focus.


Daniel Speranza
30D - 580EX II
Lee ND Grad Filters---77mmWide Angle Adapter
10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM --- 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Website (external link) * Flickr (external link) * Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jackal
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Miami, FL
     
Nov 11, 2006 18:03 |  #14

I guess I should have stated I picked the middle focus point. In fact I have the middle picked 99% of the time.

I've been doing this for a good while man.....I'm not that dumb. :p


5D+BGE4 | 30D+BGE2 | Canon 24-70mm 2.8L | Canon 28mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm |Canon 50mm 1.4 | 580EX | 420EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RgB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,323 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Nov 11, 2006 18:15 |  #15

Jackal wrote in post #2249301 (external link)
I guess I should have stated I picked the middle focus point. In fact I have the middle picked 99% of the time.

I've been doing this for a good while man.....I'm not that dumb. :p

I didn't mean it like that. When i started selecting the AF point my photography changed remarkably.

Try C-FN13-1.

Enables you to use the multi controller to select the AF Point on the fly.

C-FN13-2. Uses the Quick control Dial.

I use C-FN13-1. and C-FN4-1. plus a few others


Daniel Speranza
30D - 580EX II
Lee ND Grad Filters---77mmWide Angle Adapter
10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM --- 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Website (external link) * Flickr (external link) * Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,825 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it.
This 24-70mmL is pissing me off. :(
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1372 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.