Misty trees

I can't make my mind up wether I like these or not.

What do you guys think?

Are they worth doing more with?

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Of the two I prefer the second, the first one lacks a subject. In the second one the tree draws my eye to it.

The first one would look nicer if you were to crop the picture so that it focused more on the trees and the mist. Very good start, and is a good subject to play around with if you get more opertunities like this.

The first makes a nice pano with the top cut off at the cloud line.

Thanks for your comments.

I am gonna try a crop on the first one.

I love the second one too but I would like to see more of the foreground in it (to emphasise more the foreground/cloud/mount​ain-in-the-background thing you've got going). So in that respect I prefer the first one... But I agree that the dead tree adds to the composition...

What about this?

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

maybe if you exposed for the sky and threw the foreground into sillouette.

Montreal: When I brought out the detail at the front that reddish plant at the front becomes bright red and really distracts

Snappy: I did try that but as you drop the exposure or even the levels the trees to the left start to disappear

siejones wrote in post #2252628
Montreal: When I brought out the detail at the front that reddish plant at the front becomes bright red and really distracts

What I meant was that I would have framed the shot differently, to include more of the foreground.

siejones wrote in post #2252507
What about this?

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

much better.

I like the cropped version.

The cropped version you made is much better Siejones, good work.