Deleted.
merp Senior Member 490 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2006 More info Post edited 5 months ago by merp. | Nov 12, 2006 09:16 | #1 ![]() Deleted.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidEB Goldmember ![]() 3,117 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: North Carolina More info | Nov 12, 2006 14:54 | #2 shows character. the B&W works well. nice work. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jilliantodd Member ![]() 71 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: San Francisco Bay Area More info | Nov 12, 2006 23:08 | #3 Looks good, though the only thing I would do differently is have him turn his head a bit more to the camera so his nose wouldn't be "floating"...you'd have more of a 3/4 shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ABrownPhoto Goldmember ![]() 4,676 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2006 Location: SoCaL More info | Nov 13, 2006 00:58 | #4 Great shot to me! everything about it works IMHO! He still has one more move.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rumrunner Goldmember ![]() 1,865 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: El Paso, Texas More info | Nov 13, 2006 01:08 | #5 A nice shot. Along the same lines as what shoegirlie suggested: I think it's cropped a little tight for having his attention focused so far away from the camera. For something cropped so tight, I think more eye contact would be better IMO..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thornfield Senior Member ![]() 747 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2004 Location: Christchurch New Zealand More info | Nov 13, 2006 13:35 | #6 if you turned his head toward the camera so that his nose did not break the profile of his face I think you would get a better shot. Interesting face though, you could spend a fair bit of time taking pictures of him and trying out ideas. Relationships are like photography, it has to click.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidEB Goldmember ![]() 3,117 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: North Carolina More info | Nov 13, 2006 16:29 | #7 as the proud owner of a nose with character, I am most satisfied when that feature dominates the image. For glamor shots, minimizing the nose as other posters suggest is OK, but nobody shoots glam of me. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LBaldwin Goldmember ![]() 4,490 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: San Jose,CA More info | Nov 13, 2006 18:35 | #8 shoegirlie wrote in post #2254648 ![]() Looks good, though the only thing I would do differently is have him turn his head a bit more to the camera so his nose wouldn't be "floating"...you'd have more of a 3/4 shot. Agreed, what you are looking for is the tip of nose breaking the plan of the cheek on the other side. Try not to do that unless you are only going to show one eye. Les Baldwin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 02, 2006 19:59 | #9 ![]() sorry it took so long to reply =) thanks everything was helpful <3 apperciate it. Yea I was kind of feeling to have his head turned a bit more to show more of his nose. I will definitely work on that next time-hmm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mike Reynolds Goldmember ![]() 1,412 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Joshua Tree, CA More info | good shot there a special thanks to the Big Guy upstairs
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
Latest registered member is wiemez 1134 guests, 324 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |