Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 12 Nov 2006 (Sunday) 13:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Not enough magnification for bird photos...

 
Margie
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:05 |  #1

I would really like to take pictures of my local backyard birds...
I have a Rebel XT and a 70-200mm L Canon lens with a 1.4 TC....even with this I am not close enough.
I took a couple this morning on a tripod and with them greatly cropped down I get something...but not enough...
Can I add something else like tubes I think they are called, without spending mega bucks to get me more?
I would really appreciate your opinions and assistance.
Thank you in advance, Margie


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crypto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,648 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Northern Va
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:24 |  #2

nothing beats getting closer to the birds. I would suggest, if possible, positioning yourself in the yard where they can't see you or a bird feeder.
You certainly have a great lens, although I'm a little surprised of the quality in the ones you posted. With this lens, you should get great pics even heavily cropped.
I see you missed the focus in the one, try using (if you are not) only the center focus.
I love my tripod, but with moving subjects in low light, it really becomes more of a support device.

Tubes: Wouldn't help in this situation, only teleconverters or a new lens. You could consider the 2X teleconverter for this lens. I've heard it works well, but its about 300 bucks and I don't think you'll get enough magnification over the 1.4 to really improve the situation.


TCProimages (external link)
Canon 5DII
Canon 40D
Canon 100-400L, Canon 24-70L, Canon MP65 macro,Canon 100L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,745 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:26 |  #3

You could use a 2X tcon, but you'll loose some more light and the ability to AF with your 70-200 f/4L. Your least expensive choice while getting good image quality would be to go sith a Sigma 50-500mm:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …SA&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

The Canon 100-400 is really nice, but is more expensive than the Sigma:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …SA&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

For about the same price as the Sigma you can get a Canon 400mm "prime":

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …SA&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)


Then, if you want to spend "megabucks" you can get one of these:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …SA&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

or one of these:

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …SA&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Margie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:34 |  #4

Crypto wrote in post #2252439 (external link)
nothing beats getting closer to the birds. I would suggest, if possible, positioning yourself in the yard where they can't see you or a bird feeder.
You certainly have a great lens, although I'm a little surprised of the quality in the ones you posted. With this lens, you should get great pics even heavily cropped.
I see you missed the focus in the one, try using (if you are not) only the center focus.
I love my tripod, but with moving subjects in low light, it really becomes more of a support device.

Tubes: Wouldn't help in this situation, only teleconverters or a new lens. You could consider the 2X teleconverter for this lens. I've heard it works well, but its about 300 bucks and I don't think you'll get enough magnification over the 1.4 to really improve the situation.

The pictures I get with the 70-200 I am not finding to be especially sharp. I purchased the lens about 9 months ago. I believe it has a one year warranty from canon on it. Do you think I should send it back to them for adjustment or something?
Margie


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:40 |  #5

Margie, feed those birds and spend a lot of time out there with them. Within a week, you should be able to have them eating out of your hand.

Make sure to give them what they like best. Chopped fruit, seeds, nuts, especially peanuts. And water. Nobody thinks of water, but they will come from quite a ways to use your water, especially a bird bath that is kept clean at all times.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crypto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,648 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Northern Va
     
Nov 12, 2006 13:55 |  #6

Margie wrote in post #2252480 (external link)
The pictures I get with the 70-200 I am not finding to be especially sharp. I purchased the lens about 9 months ago. I believe it has a one year warranty from canon on it. Do you think I should send it back to them for adjustment or something?
Margie

This is a tough question to answer. I would suggest you test it with a stationary object, tripod and good light. This is one of the sharpest lenses canon makes.
Maybe you can post a test shot in a new thread to get some opinions and help. If you have your camera properly adjusted, I would think you would be nothing but amazed by this lens


TCProimages (external link)
Canon 5DII
Canon 40D
Canon 100-400L, Canon 24-70L, Canon MP65 macro,Canon 100L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 12, 2006 14:03 |  #7

If this is an IS lens, send it back and don't wait. I bought a used 100-400L and same thing, unsharp images. I finally sent mine in, no warranty, and Canon replaced the whole IS unit, and cleaned and calibrated it for another $193. Now it's a very sharp lens.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,862 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ketchikan Alaska
     
Nov 12, 2006 14:04 |  #8

I saw someone on here selling a nice 50-500 sigma for about $900 just yesterday....


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Margie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 14:54 as a reply to  @ superdiver's post |  #9

My 70-200 F 4, is not an IS...but I have been wondering before this if mine was not adjusted properly as I have never really been Wow'd by this lens like I have heard others have been. And by the photos I have seen from others posts.
I went to the canon web-site and initiated a repair. Seems there is a repair addressed in CA. less than 400 miles away. I am going to package it up and send it in and see what they can do for me.
This lens has had plenty of chance in the last 9 months to show me what it can do and it hasn't. I think I just needed this push to get me going on it.
Thank you! I will let you know how it is when it comes back!
Margie


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 12, 2006 15:00 |  #10

Well, you got time now to train those birds in proper posing techniques. When it gets back, in about a week, it'll be ready for them. :)

And I'm curious if they do it on warranty or not.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Margie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 15:32 |  #11

canonloader wrote in post #2252810 (external link)
Well, you got time now to train those birds in proper posing techniques. When it gets back, in about a week, it'll be ready for them. :)

And I'm curious if they do it on warranty or not.

I will get the feeder out...and clean out the bird bath daily :oops: !!!

So far it looks like they will do it under the warranty...it said no charge on the repair request...I will have to see what they say after they recieve it. I will let you know. I plan to get it out by UPS tomorrow.

Margie


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 12, 2006 15:44 |  #12

Ah, if they said free, then it will be free. They couldn't give me an estimate cause mine was way out of warranty. Show some pics when you get it back. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,745 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 12, 2006 15:44 |  #13

Margie wrote in post #2252780 (external link)
My 70-200 F 4, is not an IS...but I have been wondering before this if mine was not adjusted properly as I have never really been Wow'd by this lens like I have heard others have been. And by the photos I have seen from others posts.
I went to the canon web-site and initiated a repair. Seems there is a repair addressed in CA. less than 400 miles away. I am going to package it up and send it in and see what they can do for me.
This lens has had plenty of chance in the last 9 months to show me what it can do and it hasn't. I think I just needed this push to get me going on it.
Thank you! I will let you know how it is when it comes back!
Margie

The second image was shot at way too low a shutterspeed (only 1/30s). If you're hand-holding the 70-200 with a 1.4X at 280mm you need a shutterspeed of around 1/300s just to avoid blur from camera shake. Also, since birds can have sudden movements I would think your shutterspeed should be similar to stop blur from their movement.

Also, what focus point are you using? Are you using only the center AF point then doing a focus lock and recompose?

Edit: Even the first image is at too low a shutterspeed. You will get better results if you crank up your iso so that you get a fast enough shutterspeed to capture a sharp image.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Margie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 15:58 |  #14

Bob_A wrote in post #2252968 (external link)
The second image was shot at way too low a shutterspeed (only 1/30s). If you're hand-holding the 70-200 with a 1.4X at 280mm you need a shutterspeed of around 1/300s just to avoid blur from camera shake. Also, since birds can have sudden movements I would think your shutterspeed should be similar to stop blur from their movement.

Also, what focus point are you using? Are you using only the center AF point then doing a focus lock and recompose?

Edit: Even the first image is at too low a shutterspeed. You will get better results if you crank up your iso so that you get a fast enough shutterspeed to capture a sharp image.

Bob, I was using a tripod and manually focusing and kind of pre-focused the area before the birds got there. I was afraid any higher ISO than 400 be give me too grainy a picture.
It seems like I have a lot to learn with bird photos! I am not used to my subjects moving so fast!
Thank you for your suggestions. I really appreciate it. Margie


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Margie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
501 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.J. CA
     
Nov 12, 2006 16:02 as a reply to  @ Margie's post |  #15

Here is one at a higher shutter speed from this morning too...This one is the full size, with no PP...only reduced in size for up-loading. Hand held...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,373 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
Not enough magnification for bird photos...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1536 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.