Interesting: Artist, Idiot, Exhibitionist

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2267865
Olli's got my vote...

Call it "Cuervo"

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Mucho thanks, CDS.

condyk wrote in post #2267973
Accepted - the face, the banana-like Mike and the secret contents of that hand make is so!

No more, no less what I was expecting, Sir "Nature Negligee" (aka 'teenager in glue').

marie wrote in post #2268297
great shot Olli

Marie, your feedback is always more pleasing than many others.

PetKal wrote in post #2268389
Simply excellent, as most of the time.
The Elk Tap

Thanks for noticing, Sir "Bummer Joiner" (aka ''junior' member').

All, if you like to learn more about this exceptionally great and controversial artist captured in my shot, have a look at his web site: http://www.ma-numminen.net/

So much riff-raff rapping on their whims ... so, finally (the thread is not just tupperware after all!) amongst the last 100 or so 'comments' (sic) we find a greater flowering of talents. Each shot building and building to a showering climax of talent, tenacity and tension, where humour, pointedness and 'eye' mix and match, fooling each other, frollicking together in a sea of art, crap and daftness.

I applaud many of the sad, drooling losers here. The winner will be thus be crowned in due course, but not yet! S/he has still to be chosen (some say fate makes it preordained, but who knows but the big fella (or lady!) in the sky (or somewhere, everywhere, like in that little kitten, or stone, or Big Mac or rat?)

Any MC must allow his underling Hamsters the room to grow and so MD Jak is hereby appauded and promoted from Dolt to Fool for his 'comments' comment. Any image offered must be commented by the shooter him/her/itself in some small or large way (Sari, that volcano of verbal eh-ness! Please edit and refine rather than spew!)

As to scoring an entry then the power is offered to the public unwashed here present to offer their view: Reject, Accept, Ignore. You are each ready (Marie we know is colour blind but that is her crown of thorns!) Which placement bites hardest and which wraps in a cockoon of sentiment and sensual sweetiness?

Som all must now be clear: the focus of the game, the approach of the 'townsfolk' contained here and the delegated excellence of your resistent and indulgent (yet boundaried quality wise) Meister Seconds away ... grapple my Artists, Idiots, Exhibitionists in your seek of the Interesting

What on earth did he just say?

belmondo wrote in post #2270320
What on earth did he just say?

Thank god I'm not the only one who didn't get it...

belmondo wrote in post #2270320
What on earth did he just say?

You kind of get used to it after a while.......

condyk wrote in post #2270311
So much riff-raff rapping on their whims ... so, finally (the thread is not just tupperware after all!) amongst the last 100 or so 'comments' (sic) we find a greater flowering of talents. Each shot building and building to a showering climax of talent, tenacity and tension, where humour, pointedness and 'eye' mix and match, fooling each other, frollicking together in a sea of art, crap and daftness.

I applaud many of the sad, drooling losers here. The winner will be thus be crowned in due course, but not yet! S/he has still to be chosen (some say fate makes it preordained, but who knows but the big fella (or lady!) in the sky (or somewhere, everywhere, like in that little kitten, or stone, or Big Mac or rat?)

Any MC must allow his underling Hamsters the room to grow and so MD Jak is hereby appauded and promoted from Dolt to Fool for his 'comments' comment. Any image offered must be commented by the shooter him/her/itself in some small or large way (Sari, that volcano of verbal eh-ness! Please edit and refine rather than spew!)

As to scoring an entry then the power is offered to the public unwashed here present to offer their view: Reject, Accept, Ignore. You are each ready (Marie we know is colour blind but that is her crown of thorns!) Which placement bites hardest and which wraps in a cockoon of sentiment and sensual sweetiness?

Som all must now be clear: the focus of the game, the approach of the 'townsfolk' contained here and the delegated excellence of your resistent and indulgent (yet boundaried quality wise) Meister Seconds away ... grapple my Artists, Idiots, Exhibitionists in your seek of the Interesting

can you repeat that please


only kidding
(as you know all along )
I hope

wonderful stuff
especially when I understand and benefit from it all


and Condyke...

I'm not so much colour blind as trying to put (a little) colour on the dreary print, thats all.

honest , thats all

thats all it ever was
(and is)

thats all

(did I say thats all ?)

thats all



have a nice day




ps
I had to take out two of your smilies in this 'quote' above as I need to put in the correct quota only (of smilies) on my post
sorry

I'll give them back another time

belmondo wrote in post #2270320
What on earth did he just say?

remember you are due to go to bed soon Tom
and Condyke and I are just getting up (after a hard day's night)
the mind cells are flowing for Condyke
yours are getting drowzy

belmondo wrote in post #2270320
What on earth did he just say?

Claire wrote in post #2270326
Thank god I'm not the only one who didn't get it...

I blamed the lack of comprehension on the cognac...

Maureen Souza wrote in post #2270329
You kind of get used to it after a while.......

oh heavens, I hope not....I have my sanity to consider...

marie wrote in post #2270298

thats a really smashing capture CoDexO
love it

Thank you! I don't think I've ever laughed quite so hard as when I saw that squirrel try to run away with the whole peanut butter jar in tow. Because the container was as big as it was, it had some difficulty moving, and lurched and bounced across the ground, much to the amusement of the other students passing by.

condyk wrote in post #2270311
Any MC must allow his underling Hamsters the room to grow and so MD Jak is hereby appauded and promoted from Dolt to Fool for his 'comments' comment. Any image offered must be commented by the shooter him/her/itself in some small or large way (Sari, that volcano of verbal eh-ness! Please edit and refine rather than spew!)

Only one question - if an entry presented naked (i.e. without comment) is then clothed, does it become acceptable for entry?

belmondo wrote in post #2270320
What on earth did he just say?

Just smile, go along along with it, nod your head a few times, and pretend you understand - Thats what everyone else does

God, I love those squirrel shots!!

Claire wrote in post #2270421
God, I love those squirrel shots!!

I just hope it's not allergic to nuts or nut oil...

I think what he's saying is he cant be bothered to vote anymore and is passing the 'responsibility' on to us