1DsMII and ISO 3200

Woolburr wrote in post #2268108
Clearly defective...send it to my lab for further analysis. Anyone that thinks this is bad from a noise standpoint has never shot film at 3200.

Jim G wrote in post #2268121
Hmm. That grain looks less... stripey... than my 20D's at 3200. Kinda more like film grain to my eyes. Can't say that it looks too bad at all...

Thank you both, I am very pleased with the results of ISO 3200

"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
My Website

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

cosworth wrote in post #2268201
That would certainly be true if the original 1Ds went to 3200.

I've recently posted some results that fly in the face of the older 1Ds' bad reputation.

Very similar to this thread.

I like a little noise from time to time, pixel peepers don't

"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
My Website

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

cosworth wrote in post #2268219
I print over %80 of the shots I take. No noise in them...and the pixel peepers can drive down the price of the craptastic 1Ds series so that I can have more of them.

I like the way you think

"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
My Website

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty