Belmondo Cream of the Crop  42,735 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jul 2003 Location: 92210 More info | Going back to the original question in this thread, there is another thread running right now comparing the 24-70 f/2.8L and the 24-105 f/4.0L IS. In many respects, I think the 24-105 is probably a better lens for a serious amatuer, if for no other reason than the versatility. F/2.8 is nice to have where you want tight DOF, but only if you need it. Otherwise, for low light shooting situations, the IS on the f/4 is an excellent alternative to big glass. I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2814 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
