Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 16 Nov 2006 (Thursday) 17:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sensor Dirt

 
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 16, 2006 17:28 |  #1

After 3 months (yes) Canon finally got the dirt out of the viewfinder on my once new 1DMKII.
However, I think they actually made the sensor dirtier (even though they said they cleaned it each of the 4 times they had it).

This picture was taken at F13 (external link) and has been resized 50%.
Acceptable? I tried my sensor brush and copperhill, and while I didnt make it any worse, the current spots didn't budge at all.

With my 20D, ater 1 1/2 years I dont think there were more than maybe 1 spot of dust viewable at almost any aperture.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoScout
Senior Member
Avatar
887 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: California
     
Nov 16, 2006 17:34 |  #2

If my eyes are working properly, I see two tiny dots left of the center (one above the other) near the top. I really had to look hard though.

I think we DSLR users are going to have to deal with dust no matter how minute.

DEATH TO DUST !!


5D * 20D * XHA1S * HF11
EF 35mm f/1.4L USM * EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM * EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
EF-S 17-85MM f/4-5.6 IS USM * EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM * Ext EF 1.4x ll * Ext EF 2x ll * 580EX Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Papaw
Senior Member
Avatar
765 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: North Central Texas
     
Nov 16, 2006 18:09 |  #3

Looks acceptable to me. A new one probably would look no better than yours does now.


1D MKIIN 30D 20D and G6
35L 85L 400L 17-40L 24-70L 24-105L 70-200 f/2.8L IS
10-22 f3.5 60 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 16, 2006 18:14 |  #4

I could live with that...


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ T
Member
128 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Cardiff, UK.
     
Nov 16, 2006 18:19 as a reply to  @ PhotoScout's post |  #5

I've had my 30D for a few months and so far, touch wood (!), I have yet to see any evidence of dust on my photographs, (Oh dear! I should never have said that - it's going to tempt providence :oops: ) What's more, I have no intention of doing any tests like the one above - just in case there are minute specs that would start me worrying!!

Are we, perchance, running the risk of becoming just a wee bit paranoid regarding this subject?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 16, 2006 18:21 |  #6

Yeah, when I got it new, there was one large stubborn spot, visible even at about F4.
So, i sent it to canon, and they sent it back with no big dot, but lots of little ones.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Nov 16, 2006 19:28 |  #7

It may well be that the little ones will blow out - have you tried that?

Don't take my advice on blowing, I use compressed gas - "Dust-Off" by Falcon. The gas is difluorethane, a refrigerant, or on other places an ozone killer. I never shake the can or disturb it, and it DOES NOT leave residue - it's a gas composed of carbon, hydrogen and fluorine.

It's my personal belief that a rocket blower just re-circulates dust - the Copperhill guy and I seem to be in agreement on that.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 16, 2006 19:38 |  #8

Glenn, it's funny you should mention that.
That is the exact compressed air I have, Falcon Dust Off from costco.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tange1
Member
142 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 16, 2006 20:58 |  #9

I dont see how you can think a rocket blower just moves dust around and compressed air doesn't. They do the same thing, blow air..


Canon Rebel Xti, EF-S 18-55mm kit lens
EF 28-135mm f.3.5-5.6 IS
50mm f/1.8
Battery Grip
430ex ii

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 16, 2006 21:20 |  #10

tange1 wrote in post #2274144 (external link)
I dont see how you can think a rocket blower just moves dust around and compressed air doesn't. They do the same thing, blow air..

:lol:


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Nov 16, 2006 23:31 |  #11

tange1 wrote in post #2274144 (external link)
I dont see how you can think a rocket blower just moves dust around and compressed air doesn't. They do the same thing, blow air..

The gas in a compressed gas can is filtered and dried.

Where does the air from a rocket blower come from?

Ever watch what a small sunbeam lights up in a room? Kazillions of dust particles. That's what a rocket blower uses.

"Mr. Copperhill" is concerned that a rocket blower just moves dust around - I'm concerned that it uses a fresh supply of dust from the air in the room too.

I think a rocket blower will help, but since most air is so full of dust, it doesn't seem to me to be the ultimate solution.

I'll continue to use my compressed air/gas - that and Sensor Swabs with the cleaning solution. Everybody will have their own personal comfort level, and they will be different. I'm an engineer, so I likely have a different approach from many.

C'est la vie.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 16, 2006 23:38 |  #12

Well, i tried Rocket Blower, compressed air, sensor brush, and a quick attempt with the copperhill... none of these dust bunnies even budged an inch!!!


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Nov 16, 2006 23:41 as a reply to  @ Glenn NK's post |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

Purpose of the bulb blower is not to replace the air inside the camera.
Strong and well directed air blast is supposed to dislodge particles of dust and let them flow down and outside of camera.

That’s how I understand, at least..


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,866 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Likes: 6032
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 17, 2006 02:03 |  #14

In my case I found that trying to move a stubborn spot caused more grief than it was really worth. I'd be inclined to drop eclipse directly onto the spot concerned to try & "soak" it before doing the wipe. Them sensors/IR filters really aren't that robust so try to resist the temptation to "press a little harder" when wiping.

Edit: On the other hand, one of our local POTN'ers (Moppie) bought a new 30D that came factory fitted with dust spots BEHIND the IR filter - a return to canon to have it dismantled & cleaned remedied this but shows it is possible to get spots that cannot be removed by the user...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Nov 17, 2006 11:29 |  #15

drisley wrote in post #2274706 (external link)
Well, i tried Rocket Blower, compressed air, sensor brush, and a quick attempt with the copperhill... none of these dust bunnies even budged an inch!!!

Drisley: I would suggest that you repeat the Copperhill process a few times. I haven't read it for a few weeks, but I seem to recall that he recommended repeated gentle cleanings until it came clean.

And, perhaps a wee spot of the cleaner is worth a try to "dissolve" a stubborn spot. But I'd be very careful about this as who knows where the liquid might run?


Further to my comments on the rocket blower vs the compressed air - I realize that the purpose isn't to "replace the air" in the camera, the purpose is to blow the dust particles out. If dust is truly the problem, then using ambient air (room air) that is full of dust particles may not be the solution. We do realize that air is full of dust particles unless it has been filtered.

What it may come down to is that what we call dust on the sensor is not really dust. I suspect that it consists of small particles that wear off the camera when the mechanical parts operate - such as the mirror and the shutter.

Now that my camera has 3,000 shots on it, I'm having far less trouble with "sensor spots" than when it was new. This might be attributed to two things: 1) the initial "break-in period" is over, OR, 2) there was a lot of "stuff" in the chamber from the manufacturing process, and it has loosened/dislodged and been blown out with repeated cleanings.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,138 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Sensor Dirt
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2265 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.