Macro and wide angle. Not sure which WA yet, but the Canon 100 macro looks good to me.
Saralonde Goldmember 1,019 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Pennsylvania More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:32 | #16 Macro and wide angle. Not sure which WA yet, but the Canon 100 macro looks good to me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcpoulin Goldmember  2,447 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jun 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:36 | #17 Wish list... 1DX , 7D,16-35, 24-70 2.8II, 2.8L II, , 70-200 f2.8LII IS, 300 f2.8L IS, 500 f4 IS, 100-400L, Canon 100 2.8 macro, Canon 1.4X, 580ex, AB800X4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liza Cream of the Crop 11,386 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2005 Location: Mayberry More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:36 | #18  Permanent ban1D MkIIN
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rumrunner Goldmember  1,865 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: El Paso, Texas More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:38 | #19 |
motion_projekt Goldmember  2,469 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:48 | #20 Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM EOS 5Dmk3x2 | 24L | 50L | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop  14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Nov 16, 2006 18:51 | #21 I want a 400 F/2.8L IS and a 200 F/1.8L "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jesusdelallata Senior Member 633 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Brownsville, TX More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:02 | #22 85mm f1.8 will complete my "core" kit. Jesus De La Llata
LOG IN TO REPLY |
weka2000 Is that a 300mm in your pocket?  More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:07 | #23 Yes the 400 F2.8 would be very nice.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop  More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:08 | #24 For what I do, the 70-200 IS would be much more beneficial for sports than my 70-200 f4, but I don't mind it. Also, the 16-35 would probably be better for indoor shots without flash, but I love my 17-40. So, I guess I should be happy. If I shoot with a pro in the future for sports, I think I'll need something more telephoto, but can't spend anything right now. Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vannote Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: New York, NY More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:12 | #25 EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cjd Member 90 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Gurnee IL US More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:13 | #26 10-85mm at f1.4 or faster... 5D II, 30D, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, Rokinon 14 f/2.8, Sigma 24-70 f/2.8, Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 70-200 f/2.8, Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6, Sigma 2x, Kenko 1.4x, Kenko 36mm,20mm,12mm tubes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
calicokat Cream of the Crop 14,720 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Southern California More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:14 | #27 weka2000 wrote in post #2273707  Yes the 400 F2.8 would be very nice. Sometime next year hopefully or the year after that "You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know?  More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:22 | #28 |
weka2000 Is that a 300mm in your pocket? More info | Nov 16, 2006 19:24 | #29 Might put mine on the new mortgage
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rjohnston Member  232 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: S.A. TX More info | My sig says it all. I will be picking up one of those next week. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2627 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
