Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Nov 2006 (Friday) 21:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Has anyone damaged or heard of damaging thier sensor during cleanings.

 
nycgrip
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: NYC, NY
     
Nov 17, 2006 21:59 |  #1

i think the sensor is tougher than expected, and i used the sensorklear, lenspen type device,which has given me the cleanest outcome. have done copperhill method and i didnt find it effective. but with the sensorklear i find my self scrubbing quite forcefully and effectively and see no damage at all. i also dont use the sensoklear more than 3 times just in case some debris was to stick upon it. so im curious if there are any horror stories out there.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 17, 2006 22:21 |  #2

Ah, but we haven't seen any of your images yet, have we?

Welcome to the forums - I suspect you are correct in your assumptions.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Johnny ­ Thunder
Caution, Cant keep clothes on
Avatar
790 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Temecua, Ca
     
Nov 17, 2006 22:38 |  #3

I was cleaning the sensor on my 300D a while back, for the first time, and used a Q-tip, I did manage to put a small scratch on the clear glass that sits over the sensor. It didnt effect the images at all, and Canon did replace it free of charge when I took it in to have the AF system checked. I have cleaned the Sensor on the 300D and 5D dozens of time since with no problems.

Stay clear of q-tips, but the Copperhill kit I use does work wonders.

-Johnny


T2i gripped with kit lenshttp://75.126.234.18/f​orum/showthread.php?t=​400860 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,841 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 6005
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 18, 2006 04:15 |  #4

nycgrip wrote in post #2278887 (external link)
any horror stories out there.

Yes. (see sig...)


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 18, 2006 08:42 |  #5

joeseph wrote in post #2279782 (external link)
Yes. (see sig...)

That is an ugly and expensive story. Thanks for the warning so well documented with pictures...


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mantra
Goldmember
Avatar
1,617 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Italy, Rome
     
Nov 18, 2006 08:46 as a reply to  @ Titus213's post |  #6

where can i find a good tutorial to how clean sensor?


canon 5d markII,24L & 24ts , 35L ,17-40L,24-70L,70-200 2.8ISL,50 1.4,85 1.4 , canon eos 3 ,eos 5 ,t90 , ae program and some very sweet fd lenses
3 analogic Hasselblad and 2 anologic Mamiya

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Nov 18, 2006 10:56 |  #7

My comments on the guy that damaged his sensor filter:

PT Barnum was said to have said (he actually didn't): There is a sucker born every minute.

My version: there are ten klutzes born every minute.

Think for a moment: Do we really know what "dust" is composed of? Is it lint dust from clothing, or dead skin? While these are yucky they are soft. Or is dust tiny pieces of clay sized dirt (which is rock, and very hard)?

BEFORE cleaning with the pad and solution, BLOW the surface off thoroughly. This type of dirt particle is far less likely to stick, so when the MOIST pad (not wet) is used GENTLY on the surface the grit won't grind into the surface. Common sense? I think so.

There will always be someone that won't or can't follow recommended procedures carefully and will screw something up.

Google for Copperhill, and read the article carefully and thoroughly. He doesn't have much use for a rocket blower (and neither do I - I use compressed "air"). But having said that, it is my opinion that gently blowing out the chamber and the surface of the sensor is a wise first step before the wet cleaning.

Think about it this way: if you were down on your hands and knees washing a floor, would you pick up and remove the large chunks of dirt and trash before using the water and cloth? Of course.

These are just my personal observations and opinions; I won't be insulted if anyone disagrees.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,841 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 6005
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Nov 18, 2006 20:34 |  #8

Titus213 wrote in post #2280348 (external link)
That is an ugly and expensive story. Thanks for the warning so well documented with pictures...

No problem - actually I think anyone contemplating serious sensor cleaning should see how easily the surface of a IR filter/sensor is damaged. Do it with care and the right tools and you'll likely have no problem at all.

And yes, Klutz is a good description of that particular episode! :oops:


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Nov 18, 2006 20:50 |  #9

mantra wrote in post #2280360 (external link)
where can i find a good tutorial to how clean sensor?

This is the best site I've found that explains sensor cleaning methods...

http://www.cleaningdig​italcameras.com/index.​html (external link)

Hope it helps

Bill


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Nov 18, 2006 22:17 |  #10

I've sctatched a sensor cover:(:(

I'll keep the story short.
From lens servicing i had developed an awsome safe way of removing sensor dust specs one by one.For the first two years with my 300D i only cleaned the sensor this way:)
Of course doing it this way can't remove extremely fine dust so the copperhill method is needed occasionally.In the last year i cleaned using the coppehill method three times with a home made spatula thingy.
Overall it worked fine but just as i was cleaning for the last time to sell the camera i must have got a grain of dust/sand on the cleaning tissue and managed to put a 3mm long scratch on the sensor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I went ahead and sold the camera (honestly described) because the scratch simply didn't show on the images below f10 and even at smaller apertures it only showed in blank areas...and even THEN it was easy to clone out in photoshop.
In a sense i was lucky as hell.It was enough to teach me a very valuable lesson while losing not much money.

Moral of the story? Sensor covers are pretty tough but there are some things to beware of.Never ever use anything other than proper cleaning products straight from the packet !!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,006 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Has anyone damaged or heard of damaging thier sensor during cleanings.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1692 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.