Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
Thread started 19 Nov 2006 (Sunday) 14:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

EF 85 1.2L for indoor sports

 
ust82gopher
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 19, 2006 14:40 |  #1

I have a terrible gym light situation for basketball this year. Lousy enough, that I had trouble this weekend with my 70-200 2.8L IS.

Distance is not an issue as I can be almost right on top of the court. So, I am seriously considering investing in the EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM. (Use it for the season and likely sell it afterwards for a few hundred less). But I have seen several reviews that say that the AF is rather slow. If so, that would be a serious negative to me and I would probably not invest.

Does anyone here us the EF 85mm f/1.2L II in low light shooting sports (basketball preferably)? Can you comment on the AF?

Thanks.

Tim


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
illy
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: London
     
Nov 19, 2006 14:44 |  #2

I don't own the lens but have heard that the AF is very slow (as it has to move all that glass around). The f/1.8 is significantly faster and if worst comes to worst shoot in RAW and underexpose by 1/3 of a stop to get the same aperture.


Flickr (external link)
600D, 17-50, 50, 60, 100, 70-200, 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mshill
Member
132 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Nov 19, 2006 14:57 as a reply to  @ illy's post |  #3

I would be concerned about depth of field at that large an aperature, especially with sports. With the 70-200 2.8 IS you should be able to shoot ISO 1600 F/4 and maintain 1/250th shutter speed.

I shot a cheer competition that was very poorly lit with the above settings and got very good results with my Sigma 70-200 EX APO. I had to use aome serious noise reduction software, however, of the 1700 shots I took, I ended up with about 700 acceptable quality shots (printable at 5x7) and about 200 really good shots that would look great at 8x10.

I doubt that a gym could be worse lit than an auditorium with only stage lights and three spots to light the action.


50D, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8L, Kenko 1.5x Extender, Sigma EF-500 DG ST + Fong Dong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:02 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

You need the 85mm f/1.8 lens. I use it to shoot basketball throughout the season, and it's autofocus is much faster than the f/1.2 version. You need to maintain a shutter of at least 1/400 with 1/500 being optimal for basketball. I also use ISO 1600 and f/2.2 when I shoot. Samples of my basketball shots are on my Smugmug site (link below).



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:11 |  #5

mshill wrote in post #2285796 (external link)
With the 70-200 2.8 IS you should be able to shoot ISO 1600 F/4 and maintain 1/250th shutter speed.

That is the basic settings I used last year and got 60%+ acceptable shots after using a Noise Ninja profile I set up. But for some reason, there is less light this year (and somewhat yellow). Not sure why..if it's the lights are just dimmer or something else in the gym is reducing effective lighting.


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:13 |  #6

liza wrote in post #2285805 (external link)
You need the 85mm f/1.8 lens. I use it to shoot basketball throughout the season, and it's autofocus is much faster than the f/1.2 version. You need to maintain a shutter of at least 1/400 with 1/500 being optimal for basketball. I also use ISO 1600 and f/2.2 when I shoot. Samples of my basketball shots are on my Smugmug site (link below).

Liza,

Thanks so much for the hints. I am going to seriously investigate the 85 f/1.8.

Tim


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Avatar
3,079 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:15 |  #7

I have the 85mm 1.2 II and it's an excellent lens for what it was designed for, but even with the improved focus over the original version it's never going to be front runner for sports use. It's not impossible of course, but hardly the first choice. You'd be far far better off getting the 85mm 1.8 if your primary use is sport rather than portraits.

Bill


BiLL

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
radiohead
Goldmember
Avatar
1,372 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:50 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

I agree with Bill here - the 85/1.2L is a staggeringly good lens for its intended purpose, and that's not sport. Look to the 85/1.8/100/2, 135/2L trio for that.


Guy Collier Photography - Documentary Wedding Photographer (external link)
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
"It's no good saying "hold it" to a moment in real life." - Lord Snowdon
My kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Nov 19, 2006 15:52 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

The 50mm prime is also great for under the basket shots. And I LOVE the 100 f/2, because I like to shoot tight.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
     
Nov 19, 2006 16:06 |  #10

The 85 1.2 AF is slow for a reason, it's slow to get very accurate focusing.


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 19, 2006 16:21 |  #11

liza wrote in post #2285969 (external link)
And I LOVE the 100 f/2, because I like to shoot tight.

Liza,

I have the 135 f/2 on my Christmas List. Is there any advantage/performance difference shooting sports (other than reach, obviously), between the 135 f/2 and the 100 f/2?


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
259 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Nov 19, 2006 16:23 |  #12

Bill Roberts wrote in post #2285849 (external link)
You'd be far far better off getting the 85mm 1.8 if your primary use is sport rather than portraits.

Bill

Thanks Bill. Sports is the use, so I think the 85 f/1.8 is the answer!


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
Avatar
2,158 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
     
Nov 19, 2006 17:28 |  #13

jcw122 wrote in post #2286016 (external link)
The 85 1.2 AF is slow for a reason, it's slow to get very accurate focusing.

Nah, it's just slow because of it's focus design.


EOS-1D X Mark II| EOS 5D Mark IV | EOS 80D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 300/2.8 IS II | 400/2.8 IS II | 500/4 IS II | 600/4 IS II | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 11-24/4 | 16-35/2.8 III | 24-70/2.8 II | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS II | 200-400/4 IS 1.4x
Sundry: 600EX II-RT | 1.4x III | 2x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
     
Nov 19, 2006 17:37 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

ust82gopher wrote in post #2286075 (external link)
Liza,

I have the 135 f/2 on my Christmas List. Is there any advantage/performance difference shooting sports (other than reach, obviously), between the 135 f/2 and the 100 f/2?

The 135 reportedly has superior image quality. I like the 100 because I shoot from the sidelines and the 135 would be a bit too long. I would like to have the f/2 version of it (I have the f/2.8.) for volleyball, though.



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
Avatar
7,527 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2005
Location: .... with a long history
     
Nov 19, 2006 18:16 |  #15

You could sell the 70-200L and get a 85 1.8 and a 135L.
When I had the 85L I tried it on my daughters skating and gymnastics with no luck.
It's not what it's designed for and you would only end up being frustrated.
Crank up the ISO and use noise ninja if it's a problem.

Dan


A crap pile of various gear!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,177 views & 0 likes for this thread
EF 85 1.2L for indoor sports
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is TechOne
787 guests, 385 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.