mshill Member 132 posts Joined Jun 2006 More info | Nov 20, 2006 15:01 | #1 I am new to post processing and had the "oppurtunity" to shoot in a poorly lit venue sans flash. I was forced to shoot at ISO 1600 and underexpose by 1/3 to 1/2 stop thus adding to the amount of noise. 50D, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8L, Kenko 1.5x Extender, Sigma EF-500 DG ST + Fong Dong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop  19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Nov 20, 2006 15:07 | #2 Remove noise, then sharpen. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottes Trigger Man - POTN Retired  12,842 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2003 Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA More info | Nov 20, 2006 15:09 | #3 Ditto. You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005  10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | And you can expect that a poorly exposed image (the underexposure that you did) will attract more noise in the image than if you had nailed it in the first place. My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
In2Photos Cream of the Crop 19,813 posts Likes: 6 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Near Charlotte, NC. More info | Nov 20, 2006 15:37 | #5 ssim wrote in post #2290267  And you can expect that a poorly exposed image (the underexposure that you did) will attract more noise in the image than if you had nailed it in the first place. Actually you will find that in this thread there was no less noise on an ISO3200 properly exposed shot versus a one stop underexposed, corrected ISO1600 shot. Mike, The Keeper of the Archive
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 20, 2006 15:44 | #6 ssim wrote in post #2290267 And you can expect that a poorly exposed image (the underexposure that you did) will attract more noise in the image than if you had nailed it in the first place. Had to underexpose to keep shutter speed up in order to capture movement. 50D, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8L, Kenko 1.5x Extender, Sigma EF-500 DG ST + Fong Dong
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Nov 20, 2006 16:04 | #7 Don't bother sharpening - try it yourself, in print not at 100% on your monitor, and make up your own mind about that Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dave_bass5 Goldmember  4,329 posts Gallery: 34 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 303 Joined Apr 2005 Location: London, centre of the universe More info | Nov 22, 2006 08:49 | #8 Quick question on this topic. Dave.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottes Trigger Man - POTN Retired 12,842 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2003 Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA More info | Nov 22, 2006 09:26 | #9 I don't think it matters since just adjusting EC will adjust noise and non-noise equally, so the NR software should not find a difference between the adjusted and non-adjusted noise. You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1124 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
