Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 21 Nov 2006 (Tuesday) 21:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

EF 100 mm f/2 USM For Sports?

 
jsanz11
Senior Member
895 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Laredo, Texas
     
Nov 21, 2006 21:38 |  #1

Has anyone tried this one? I seem to have problems sometimes with the 1.8 50 and 85mm lenses. Maybe f/2 won't be as tight but is 100mm too much for gym sports like basketball and volleyball? NOt sure if anyone ahs tried this?
Maybe liza
-Joey


Canon Equipment
1D Mark III, 1D Mark II, 5D Mark II, 30D
300 f/2.8 | 100-400 F/4.5-5.6 | 70-200 f2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 85 F/1.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 1.4x & 2x Extenders | 100 F/2.8 Macro |
WWW.JSPHOTOSTUDIO.COM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsanz11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
895 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Laredo, Texas
     
Nov 22, 2006 04:03 |  #2

anyone?


Canon Equipment
1D Mark III, 1D Mark II, 5D Mark II, 30D
300 f/2.8 | 100-400 F/4.5-5.6 | 70-200 f2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 85 F/1.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 1.4x & 2x Extenders | 100 F/2.8 Macro |
WWW.JSPHOTOSTUDIO.COM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cadwell
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,333 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Nov 22, 2006 04:57 |  #3

I like it for indoor sports. I find it's a nicer lens than the 85mm, it's not quite so keen to purple fringe around areas of extreme contrast and it's AF is just as fast and accurate as the 85mm. (I have both, BTW). As to focal length, I couldn't say. Only you can judge how far you're going to be from your subject.


Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport (external link)/Canoe Polo (external link)/Other Stuff (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MegaTron
Senior Member
Avatar
868 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Southern Cali
     
Nov 22, 2006 05:02 |  #4

When I had it, I did some indoor basketball shots and I thought it was a bit too long. I was standing right on the sideline though, so if you are shooting from the stands, then I guess it would be perfect.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KCMO ­ Al
Goldmember
Avatar
1,115 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
     
Nov 22, 2006 05:07 |  #5

You don't say which body you have. (camera I mean). If it's a crop then the 100mm will effectively be 160mm. Depending on where you will be (floor or stands) it might be a bit long, although you would be able to isolate the action. On FF I'd think it would be ok. Having one lens is always a compromise, however. When Canon came out with the 50 f1.0 years ago, they posted a spread using it at a basketball game. Shooter was right on the line behind the backboard, though. Obviously this was FF film as well.


Film: Leica M-4, Elan 7E, Rolleiflex 2.8f, Pentax 645 -- Digital: Canon Pro-1, EOS 5D Mk III
EOS Lenses: Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX - Canon EF 17-40 f4.0L - Canon EF 24-105 f4.0L - Canon EF 35 f1.4L USM - Canon EF100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM - Canon EF100 f2.8 Macro - Other stuff: MR 14EX - 430EX - 580EXII - ST-E2 - TC1.4x - TC-80N3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kidpower
Senior Member
513 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
     
Nov 22, 2006 05:23 as a reply to  @ KCMO Al's post |  #6

It's excellent for indoor sports of any kind. I use it and the 85 1.8 on my XT. For basketball, I move around a lot (if I can) and the 100 F2.0 is an outstanding performer.

A lot depends on what kind of shots you are after and where you are positioned. If you are under the basket it's tight if you're looking for action under the basket. If you are sidleines or mid-court it's great (although you will get a different perspective of the action). From the stands, it's perfect (of course, with an entirely different perspective of the action).

It all depends on what type of action you want to capture.

In my experiences it's hard to beat the 85 1.8 and the 100 2.0 for indoor sports of any kind. Just my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mspringfield
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
     
Nov 22, 2006 05:35 |  #7

I like it as well. I think the 100 F2 is one of Canon's most underrated lenses

Michael


Michael Springfield - Chattanooga, TN
Canon 1DsMkIII, Canon EOS M, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Canon EF 1.4x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsanz11
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
895 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Laredo, Texas
     
Nov 22, 2006 18:41 |  #8

I have access to be on the sidelines of highschool and college games and below like grades 1-8. I use a Canon 10D and 30D with the 50 1.8. I wanted to get a 2nd lens for my 2nd camera to ahve both.. I'm just not sure of the 200 being to tight for those indoor sports when i'm on the sidlines. I like tight photos but not too tight. Anyone have any samples with their lenses? Thanks for all the help guys this is why i love this fourm.
-Joey


Canon Equipment
1D Mark III, 1D Mark II, 5D Mark II, 30D
300 f/2.8 | 100-400 F/4.5-5.6 | 70-200 f2.8 | 24-70 f/2.8 | 85 F/1.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 1.4x & 2x Extenders | 100 F/2.8 Macro |
WWW.JSPHOTOSTUDIO.COM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,346 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
EF 100 mm f/2 USM For Sports?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1635 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.