Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 22 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 11:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hey Audiophiles!

 
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:25 |  #31

Noise cancelling only helps in a environment with repetitive "white" noise - like on a plane, sitting next to a fan or a waterfall, etc. They cancel that noise, but let non-repetetive noise through - like talking or sudden noises. Otherwise they will degrade the sound a bit.

They will be useless in a "rather quiet place."


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:27 |  #32

I thought noise canceling also kept a lot of the sound in - so as to not disturb others.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:31 |  #33

Scottes wrote in post #2303241 (external link)
Noise cancelling only helps in a environment with repetitive "white" noise - like on a plane, sitting next to a fan or a waterfall, etc. They cancel that noise, but let non-repetetive noise through - like talking or sudden noises. Otherwise they will degrade the sound a bit.

They will be useless in a "rather quiet place."

I tend to disagree, O Great Bearded One.

I'm sure that you get the best results with white or pink noise, but they also work pretty well with other types of noise. I wear mine a lot when my wife has the television on, and they are effective. In fact, our chairs are only about four feet apart, and if she speaks to me in a normal tone of voice, I really can't hear her when I'm using the headphones.

No, they're not perfect, but they're better than what I believe you're thinking.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:43 |  #34

I went ahead and ordered the headphones. B&H has them for even less....$73.15 with free shipping. Even if they aren't "ideal" they almost have to be a helluva lot better than these Sonys.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:48 |  #35

belmondo wrote in post #2303261 (external link)
I tend to disagree, O Great Bearded One.

I'm sure that you get the best results with white or pink noise, but they also work pretty well with other types of noise. I wear mine a lot when my wife has the television on, and they are effective. In fact, our chairs are only about four feet apart, and if she speaks to me in a normal tone of voice, I really can't hear her when I'm using the headphones.

No, they're not perfect, but they're better than what I believe you're thinking.

I guess they've made some progress since I last tried them, many years ago. Cool. Do they come with a more effective "wife" mode? :-)


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
42,735 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jul 2003
Location: 92210
     
Nov 23, 2006 08:52 |  #36

Scottes wrote in post #2303318 (external link)
I guess they've made some progress since I last tried them, many years ago. Cool. Do they come with a more effective "wife" mode? :-)

Not really. Unlike a wife, you can turn the headphones off, however.

I think they are improved in recent years. (headphones....not wives). I remember trying on a pair some years ago and not being very impressed.


I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 23, 2006 21:29 |  #37

www.headphonereviews.o​rg (external link) is an excellent site for this, it has a wizard and all. It's aimed at audiophiles but has some cheaper stuff too.

You'll not get anything great for $50, not near it, but you can get decent for $50. You can spend $10K on headphones if you're crazy. I have Sennheiser 280 Pro headphones which I quite like, but the bass is a bit light (but very low), and the treble's a bit harsh, and after 2-3 years the headbands crack. $100 or so I think. With a good EQ they work well, I use them at home all the time. I use Audio-Technica A900s as my headphones at work, they're great, well ballanced, but quite large and US$200. Lately i've been using Creative EP-630 earbuds at work, i'm quite impressed given their cost - < US$50. If you get 630s try and find the model with asymmetrical cord lengths. Koss has a good reputation for your price range.

belmondo wrote in post #2303334 (external link)
Not really. Unlike a wife, you can turn the headphones off, however.

I dunno, I think you can turn a wife off, but not in the way you mean :p


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20DNewbie
"don't listen to me, I'm an idiot"
Avatar
2,733 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Massachusetts
     
Nov 23, 2006 23:17 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #38

I know it's a bit late, but I've another vote for Sennheiser. I've had my HD600s' for 3-4 years now and I couldn't be happier with them. To top it off, if some part of it gets broken(I'm on my 4th set of cables now) you can order replacement parts. And if you happen to like bass, not to worry as they're able to rattle your head.:lol:


Christian.
Feedback: POTN - FM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 23, 2006 23:32 as a reply to  @ 20DNewbie's post |  #39

Man, I used to be a head-fi freak. If this was head-fi and you didn't name a budget, I'de be hooking you with a pair of Sennheiser hd-595's (probably the best you'll get unamped, or the cheaper 555's as the 580's 600's and 650's are all pretty high impedance), they are deadly comfertable. Also depending on the laptop, a external soundcard / dac could be in place too.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20DNewbie
"don't listen to me, I'm an idiot"
Avatar
2,733 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Massachusetts
     
Nov 23, 2006 23:36 as a reply to  @ 20DNewbie's post |  #40

Thought I'd add this for the Sennheiser/Grado crowd, supposedly this guy makes some of the best cables out there(his sites changed since the last time I checked it out and he used to have mag reviews linked). I thought about getting a set but couldn't justify having a $600+/- headphone cable combo for an iPod/lappy.:lol::lol::lol:

http://www.moon-audio.com/ (external link)


Christian.
Feedback: POTN - FM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 23, 2006 23:39 |  #41

Morgandy wrote in post #2299392 (external link)
I know that your budget is $50, but as long as your ears are in good shape I don't think you can buy anything pleasing for under $200 to $300. Every time I decide I need a new pair of headphones and do the research, I end up spending $300. Right now I use a Sennheiser HD 590 and an HD 600 (one for the computer, one for the CD player).

www.headphone.com (external link) may help you sort out headphones by type, price, manufacturer, etc. The site has lots of ways to compare. (I do not have anything to do with the site, so if you buy or don't buy from them, it doesn't matter to me)

If you go to B&H Photo they have Sennheiser HD595's for $176.98, which I think is a very good price for what I feel is a decent set of headphones.

Edit: I use Senn CX300 earbuds at work with my Treo 650. They work great for me.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 23, 2006 23:56 |  #42

Bob_A wrote in post #2306170 (external link)
If you go to B&H Photo they have Sennheiser HD595's for $176.98, which I think is a very good price for what I feel is a decent set of headphones.

Edit: I use Senn CX300 earbuds at work with my Treo 650. They work great for me.

Like I mentioned in my post, the 555's should also be considered. I should had kept my 595's, but I upgraded to the 600's and in return began buying all the stuff like the amps and going way too advanced.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonG
Goldmember
Avatar
1,007 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Kitchener, ON
     
Nov 24, 2006 00:06 |  #43

20DNewbie wrote in post #2306162 (external link)
... I thought about getting a set but couldn't justify having a $600+/- headphone cable combo for an iPod/lappy. ...

It's for the best anyways. All of those insanely high priced "audiophile" cables and interconnects are nothing more than a scam to take your cash out of your wallet, and the people who sell them are no better than the snake oil venders of old.


-- Michael (a.k.a. SimonG)
EOS 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.4 | 430EX | Zenfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 24, 2006 00:09 |  #44

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2306215 (external link)
Like I mentioned in my post, the 555's should also be considered. I should had kept my 595's, but I upgraded to the 600's and in return began buying all the stuff like the amps and going way too advanced.

The 600's are beautiful, but I chose the 595's because of bang for the buck, while getting a nice sounding, really comfortable set of headphones that I can listen to for hours.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 00:12 |  #45

Bob_A wrote in post #2306247 (external link)
The 600's are beautiful, but I chose the 595's because of bang for the buck, while getting a nice sounding, really comfortable set of headphones that I can listen to for hours.

They are more comfertable.

I am thinking of selling my 600's, PPA amp, preamp, dvd/sacd/dvd-a/cd player, satellite radio, cd player, etc, and downsizing to just an intergrated amp and pair of 595's.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,494 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Hey Audiophiles!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2400 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.