Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
Thread started 22 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 11:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Hey Audiophiles!

 
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Nov 24, 2006 00:31 |  #46

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2306254 (external link)
They are more comfertable.

I am thinking of selling my 600's, PPA amp, preamp, dvd/sacd/dvd-a/cd player, satellite radio, cd player, etc, and downsizing to just an intergrated amp and pair of 595's.

I went simple ... I have a Marantz PM7200. Maybe not the best integrated amp for someone that likes high-end equipment, but I'm pretty pleased with it and it sounds fine to me with my 595's. Another bang for the buck type decision ...


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,927 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10124
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Nov 24, 2006 00:53 |  #47

I try to avoid headphones, it's just a thing, but when I need to use them for work related etc. I also recommend the Sennheiser (The best I ever heard were Sennheiser Orpheus tubed electrostatics) and Grado, also Koss is a good choice, and Stax used to make some swell sounding phones too, don't know if there still around.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 01:11 |  #48

Bob_A wrote in post #2306300 (external link)
I went simple ... I have a Marantz PM7200. Maybe not the best integrated amp for someone that likes high-end equipment, but I'm pretty pleased with it and it sounds fine to me with my 595's. Another bang for the buck type decision ...

Yeah, stand alone components are always the best, but it becomes redundant to have so much stuff for a difference I'm not sure I can even hear. Plus, I could probably get some damn nice photo gear for the cost of my audio stuff I could pawn off.

CDS, Stax is still around, they are like legendary for headphones, the Omega's they create in particular from what I remember. The orpheus is a legendary headphone no longer manufactered, you are lucky to have heard one. Both the orpheus and mini oprheus are pricy though, and could get you some sweet camera gear for the $ you pay.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Nov 24, 2006 01:51 |  #49

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2306395 (external link)
Yeah, stand alone components are always the best, but it becomes redundant to have so much stuff for a difference I'm not sure I can even hear. Plus, I could probably get some damn nice photo gear for the cost of my audio stuff I could pawn off.

All my audio equipment is seperate units. Mainly because you get much better quality and better power for each unit. Also I hate integrated units because if the cd player for example breaks you have to bring the whole unit to repair which means you don't have anything to listen on. With seperate units you just bring in the cd and you can still enhoy radio or whatever audio sources you have. I have probably spent close to $10.000 (or more) on my audio and video equipment. Yes that would buy a lot of camera equipment but I enjoy music and video just as much as photography.


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 03:09 |  #50

tommykjensen wrote in post #2306480 (external link)
All my audio equipment is seperate units. Mainly because you get much better quality and better power for each unit. Also I hate integrated units because if the cd player for example breaks you have to bring the whole unit to repair which means you don't have anything to listen on. With seperate units you just bring in the cd and you can still enhoy radio or whatever audio sources you have. I have probably spent close to $10.000 (or more) on my audio and video equipment. Yes that would buy a lot of camera equipment but I enjoy music and video just as much as photography.

Heh, not sure what your talking about in your sample.

By stand alone I mean something like:
A power amp and preamp instead of an intergrated amp. There is nothing wrong with an intergrated amp, just that you'll probably get better from a good power amp and preamp. I'm not talking about those units that have cd player, radio, amp, etc, all built in. I'm referring more to a reciever instead of an intergrated amp and seperate tuner / digital processor, and instead of an intergrated amp a power amp and preamp or whatever.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommykjensen
Cream of the Crop
21,013 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 260
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
     
Nov 24, 2006 03:11 |  #51

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2306649 (external link)
Heh, not sure what your talking about in your sample.

By stand alone I mean something like:
A power amp and preamp instead of an intergrated amp. There is nothing wrong with an intergrated amp, just that you'll probably get better from a good power amp and preamp. I'm not talking about those units that have cd player, radio, amp, etc, all built in. I'm referring more to a reciever instead of an intergrated amp and seperate tuner / digital processor, and instead of an intergrated amp a power amp and preamp or whatever.


Ahh ok. I thought you meant the all-in-one boxes.


EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 03:17 |  #52

tommykjensen wrote in post #2306654 (external link)
Ahh ok. I thought you meant the all-in-one boxes.

Yeah. Sound is subjective too, and after spending all this dough, I realize I have both a) no good taste in music probably because of my age and b) ears that can't hear crap between some gear that a lot of people say they can hear differences in, could be because I have not trained my ears or whatever, but spending so much money to not be able to hear a difference is dissapointing.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 24, 2006 05:21 as a reply to  @ JaGWiRE's post |  #53

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2306144 (external link)
Man, I used to be a head-fi freak. If this was head-fi and you didn't name a budget, I'de be hooking you with a pair of Sennheiser hd-595's (probably the best you'll get unamped, or the cheaper 555's as the 580's 600's and 650's are all pretty high impedance), they are deadly comfertable. Also depending on the laptop, a external soundcard / dac could be in place too.

I have a www.head-fi.org (external link) account with a few thousand posts I think, but I got over it. If anyone wants to buy a PPA headphone amp with a diamond buffer and a built in DAC I have one for sale.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 24, 2006 08:04 |  #54

I had to be a little sane with my purchases...I know you can go nuts with any kind of hobby/profession/addic​tion but all I wanted was good headphones for my laptop. Considering my untrained ears, I think the HD-280 Pros will be more than enough. I'll probably be in heaven with 'em.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
Avatar
3,154 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: to
     
Nov 24, 2006 11:51 |  #55

I love my AKG K81DJs.

I'm in love with AKG though, K501 are my favourite by far.


Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 13:51 |  #56

tim wrote in post #2306784 (external link)
I have a www.head-fi.org (external link) account with a few thousand posts I think, but I got over it. If anyone wants to buy a PPA headphone amp with a diamond buffer and a built in DAC I have one for sale.

Haha, you and I. I have a MisterX PPA too with diamond buffer maxed out, steps, etc, no built in dac though. Probably could get somewhere around $200 USD for it.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Nov 24, 2006 14:58 |  #57

cdi-ink.com wrote in post #2307058 (external link)
I had to be a little sane with my purchases...I know you can go nuts with any kind of hobby/profession/addic​tion but all I wanted was good headphones for my laptop. Considering my untrained ears, I think the HD-280 Pros will be more than enough. I'll probably be in heaven with 'em.

Make sure you have a decent EQ before you decide on these. The Sony V6 (external link) are in the same class and are meant to be very robust.

JaGWiRE wrote in post #2307919 (external link)
Haha, you and I. I have a MisterX PPA too with diamond buffer maxed out, steps, etc, no built in dac though. Probably could get somewhere around $200 USD for it.

Mine's a MisterX PPA as well, Marshall's a nice guy. You think yours is only worth US$200? Damn, hoping to get more than that for mine.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaGWiRE
Goldmember
3,859 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 24, 2006 16:44 |  #58

tim wrote in post #2308130 (external link)
Make sure you have a decent EQ before you decide on these. The Sony V6 (external link) are in the same class and are meant to be very robust.

Mine's a MisterX PPA as well, Marshall's a nice guy. You think yours is only worth US$200? Damn, hoping to get more than that for mine.

Maybe $250. Mine is like maxxed out, but I can't remember half the crap in it :(. My hd-600's have a fancy $200 upgrade cable on them that can be used either balanced or 1/4" too, so maybe for the amp headphones and upgrade cable I can get $500. The amps rca jacks need to be tightened and the headphones need new pads and are nicked up a bit / not in the greatest condition. I have a Esound CD-E5 player I am trying to get rid of too, I paid around $600 + $50 shipping, a guy near me is willing to pay $400 so I might take him up on it.
My wharfedale diamond 9.1 speakers right now are connected to a old school marantz reciever my friend loaned me. It is failing I think though, so I am going to replace it probably with this http://nadelectronics.​com …ereo-Integrated-Amplifier (external link) and somehow use this subwoofer with the setup http://www.av123.com …n=subwoofers&pr​oduct=12.1 (external link) and then just hook up a pair of 595's to the Nad amp. It would be a much simpler setup then I have now, and probably sound good enough for me. Would save me some $ too to put into some photography stuff.
BTW, I think the a900's are considered one of the best phones without a headphone amp.


Canon EOS 30D, Sigma 30 1.4, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 105 Macro, 135L, 430ex, Lowepro Mini Trekker AW, Manfrotto 3001pro w/486rc2 and 804rc2 head, Manfrotto 681 w/ 3232 head.
http://www.brianstar.s​mugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zepher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,626 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk,VA
     
Nov 24, 2006 18:25 |  #59

get a pair of these,
http://www.justplaymus​ic.com …nfo.php?product​s_id=14452 (external link)


Manny Desantos
Intel C2Q Q6600 3.06Ghz, 8GB Ram, 8.1TB, XFX HD5850, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, PS CS4 EXT (external link)

Canon 40D, EF 28-70L, 2x Canon XH-A1 HDV, Canon HV30 HDV
❶_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zepher
Goldmember
Avatar
1,626 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk,VA
     
Nov 24, 2006 18:27 |  #60

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #2306352 (external link)
I try to avoid headphones, it's just a thing, but when I need to use them for work related etc. I also recommend the Sennheiser (The best I ever heard were Sennheiser Orpheus tubed electrostatics) and Grado, also Koss is a good choice, and Stax used to make some swell sounding phones too, don't know if there still around.

I listened to a pair of STAX Electrostatics on a STAX Tube amp and they were the best headphones I ever listened to. The phones and amp were around $5K if I remember correctly about 16 years ago.


Manny Desantos
Intel C2Q Q6600 3.06Ghz, 8GB Ram, 8.1TB, XFX HD5850, Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, PS CS4 EXT (external link)

Canon 40D, EF 28-70L, 2x Canon XH-A1 HDV, Canon HV30 HDV
❶_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,495 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Hey Audiophiles!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff The Lounge 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2400 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.