Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 15:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New 5D....need help with exposure question

 
austinjames
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
     
Nov 22, 2006 15:39 |  #1

I just got a new 5D and 24-105mm lens. Out shooting today and every picture seems to be to bright and overexposed. Shooting mostly on P, some on Tv and Av...but all seem overexposed and bright. Maybe even a hint of too much blue in the picture. I compared pictures with the same lens on my 20d under same conditions and the 20D is rendering much more natural colors and the exposure I would expect. I have tried the different picture styles but it does not seem to change anything that I can tell in terms of to much brightness. Any thoughts or suggestions???

By the way....the lens is rendering an incredilbly sharp image....just to much light it seems.


Canon 5D3,
Canon 70-200 2.8L, 70-200 4.0L, 24-105, 135 2.0, 500mm IS
http://wildlifeandscen​icphotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nburwell
Goldmember
Avatar
1,265 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Wilmington, DE
     
Nov 22, 2006 16:10 |  #2

Are you shooting in RAW? You can correct your WB in PP. Although I don't own the 5D, I'm sure it has the custom WB where you can set it your own specifications. As for the overexposure of the shots, you can set the exposure compensation to -1 to purposely underexpose the shot. That's what I would personally do. I'm sure there will be others that can offer other suggestions to help you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drparker
Senior Member
815 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Chicago area
     
Nov 22, 2006 16:15 |  #3

austinjames wrote in post #2300215 (external link)
I just got a new 5D and 24-105mm lens. Out shooting today and every picture seems to be to bright and overexposed. Shooting mostly on P, some on Tv and Av...but all seem overexposed and bright. Maybe even a hint of too much blue in the picture. I compared pictures with the same lens on my 20d under same conditions and the 20D is rendering much more natural colors and the exposure I would expect. I have tried the different picture styles but it does not seem to change anything that I can tell in terms of to much brightness. Any thoughts or suggestions???

By the way....the lens is rendering an incredilbly sharp image....just to much light it seems.

I don't have a problem with mine. What metering mode are you using? Post a sample shot.


Join us in Chicago on April 22nd (Click here for more details)
5D, 85 f1.8, 24-70L[COLOR=black] f2.8, 70-200L f/4, 580ex, 430ex.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twotimer
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Nov 22, 2006 16:20 as a reply to  @ drparker's post |  #4

You did not accidentally dial in a couple of stops of exposure compensation, quite easy to do by turning the quick control dial.

Gerhard




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roy ­ Hernandez
Senior Member
Avatar
317 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Sunny San Diego
     
Nov 22, 2006 16:59 |  #5

one thing to think about is your metering on the subject, if it gives you a little bit dim or darker then your background is lighted up of course it will give you over exposed scene, remember... you have 2 different kind of camera therefor both of them have different kind of aspects regardless on how it operates.


For visiting San Diego area info @ - http://www.sdphotoforu​m.com (external link)
My Photos (external link) - I'm 1OO% FILIPINO! I eat Balot, Bagoong, and Tuyo. Ikaw Ba?!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hawg ­ Hanner
Senior Member
462 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2006
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:26 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Are you making this determination by looking at the photo on the LCD alone? If so, photos on the 5D's LCD screen appear brighter than those on the 20D because it is larger. It is also true that while I always have to increase the exposure compensation one tick on my Canon 20D, my Canon 5D is always spot on, so I think there can be a difference. It might also be due to the fact that you're using a different metering method than what the 20D would otherwise allow due to its technical limitations.

Lastly, I would recommend reviewing images on your 5D's rear LCD with the use of the histogram, especially until you get used to your new camera. If the images are within the histogram's proverbial 'sweet spot' you should have nothing to worry about. If, on the other hand, the images do not sync with the histogram on the camera then you may very well have a problem.

You could also post an example here and I'm sure there will be plenty of experienced photogs who will offer their two cents.


HH

http://flickr.com/phot​os/latitudes/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
steveathome
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Mar 2006
Location: From London UK living in Northampton UK
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:29 |  #7

Dont just rely on the in built meter, view the histogram after the first shot, and adjust accordingly, your exposure will then be spot on.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:30 |  #8

Have you taken the images to your computer and compared?


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:46 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Which metering mode? If you're in evaluative, remember the exposure for this metering is linked to the AF point. So if you are focusing on a darker portion in the frame it will expose for that darkness and make other areas bright/too bright. Similarly if you AF on a bright/brightest point in the frame it wil expose for that and make the rest of the frame darker.

There is no exposure linkage in partial, spot, or centerweighted metering to the AF point used.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Chew
Goldmember
Avatar
1,702 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 83
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Ipoh, Malaysia
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:55 |  #10

Greetings,
This combo on mine is spot on. As suggested, double check your exposure compensation, if not, send it back to canon. Enjoy...


5DII and a few L lenses.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
austinjames
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
     
Nov 22, 2006 18:57 as a reply to  @ George Chew's post |  #11

Here are a couple of typical pictures from today....all of them seem to be like this. I have checked all the settings as far as I know how....I appreciate the advice and help.


Canon 5D3,
Canon 70-200 2.8L, 70-200 4.0L, 24-105, 135 2.0, 500mm IS
http://wildlifeandscen​icphotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 22, 2006 19:01 |  #12

austinjames wrote in post #2301041 (external link)
Here are a couple of typical pictures from today....all of them seem to be like this. I have checked all the settings as far as I know how....I appreciate the advice and help.

No photos.

Like others have said, check your EC - Exposure Compensation - setting as well as FEC - Flash Exposure Compensation. It's fairly easy to get them set wrong without realizing it, especially if you don't know what they are and how to set them.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
austinjames
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
150 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2005
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
     
Nov 22, 2006 19:02 as a reply to  @ austinjames's post |  #13

sorry here they are


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 5D3,
Canon 70-200 2.8L, 70-200 4.0L, 24-105, 135 2.0, 500mm IS
http://wildlifeandscen​icphotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twotimer
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Nov 22, 2006 19:09 |  #14

Aside from not being necessary to shoot ISO 400 I see nothing obvious in the EXIF data to point to the cause.

Gerhard




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Nov 22, 2006 19:22 |  #15

The slight color shift can be corrected by judicious use of White Balance settings.

The exposure problems appear to me to be caused by the method of metering and the fact that the two scenes are somewhat tricky to meter.

The first shot has a very bright center and a rather dark surround. Using the metering in fully automatic "pattern" mode, the camera could easily have mistaken the dark background as being something you were really interested in. The second shot is similar in that the face is bright but the rest is not.

Shots like these demand CONTROL of the exposure measuring method because the camera (and its generic programming) cannot possibly know what you want in any particular situation. To do shots like these, I would use a handheld incident meter to measure the light falling on the subject. To use the camera's reflected light meter to do the same thing, you could read a standard 18% gray card to get the exposure settings. Locking the exposure settings into "M" (manual) mode makes a lot of sense in this kind of situation. Then, because you have determined and locked in the exposure settings, all you need to concentrate on is focusing and framing.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,720 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
New 5D....need help with exposure question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1745 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.