Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 Nov 2006 (Wednesday) 17:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just a quick question about CF card speed

 
slyone
Senior Member
626 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Upstate,N.Y.
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:41 |  #1

Which is faster? Which is better?
Sandisk 2Gb. Ultra II or Kingston 2Gb.50X elite pro? Thanks


40D, 70-200 f/2.8L, Tamron17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II, EX-580,Canon 1.4tc:D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elader
Goldmember
Avatar
2,374 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Maryland
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:52 |  #2

slyone wrote in post #2300733 (external link)
Which is faster? Which is better?
Sandisk 2Gb. Ultra II or Kingston 2Gb.50X elite pro? Thanks

Ultra II - have a couple of both. Only notice it when I fill the buffer.


Eric
FJR1300 rider
5D mkIII and 1D MkIII

16-35L | 24-105L | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 85 f/1.8 / 50 f.1,4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dbiggs
Member
218 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Pickering,Ontario,Canada
     
Nov 22, 2006 17:55 |  #3

I agree anything faster that 40X write is erevelant because the camera can't go any faster .


EOS 20D
Canon 70-200 f4 L
Tanron 28-70 2.8 XR Di
Tokina 12-24mm f/4 AT-X 124AF Pro DX
Sigma APO 1.4 Teleconverter
Canon 18-55 kit lens
430 EX Speedlight
Manfrotto monopod/tripod
Lowepro AW 200 sling bag

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slyone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
626 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Upstate,N.Y.
     
Nov 22, 2006 20:13 as a reply to  @ dbiggs's post |  #4

Thanks guys!


40D, 70-200 f/2.8L, Tamron17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II, EX-580,Canon 1.4tc:D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Nov 22, 2006 20:45 |  #5

Just to add to the others-
I did a whole lot of research on this recently.I found that anything faster than the ultra II is wasted on the Xti,so it would certainly be the same situation for your Xt.
In case it's interesting to you -my brother has normal sandisk cards so i compared them to the ultra II.
One can tell the difference but it's not alot even between these two




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 22, 2006 20:58 |  #6

Check this site out it might be informative:

http://www.robgalbrait​h.com/bins/multi_page.​asp?cid=6007 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slyone
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
626 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Upstate,N.Y.
     
Nov 22, 2006 22:24 as a reply to  @ lostdoggy's post |  #7

Thanks for the assistance! It seems the Sandisk writes almost 30% faster than the Kingston pro, although I believe the camera is limited anyways to just over 5MBs. Also the Sandisk has a lifetime warranty verses 3 years. Geez, the Kingston can be had for just $19.99 ARw/GCO at Buy.com verses the Ultra at Staples this Friday for just $39.99 or double...:confused:


40D, 70-200 f/2.8L, Tamron17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II, EX-580,Canon 1.4tc:D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Nov 23, 2006 02:42 |  #8

slyone wrote in post #2301889 (external link)
Thanks for the assistance! It seems the Sandisk writes almost 30% faster than the Kingston pro, although I believe the camera is limited anyways to just over 5mps. Also the Sandisk has a lifetime warranty verses 3 years. Geez, the Kingston can be had for just $19.99 ARw/GCO at Buy.com verses the Ultra at Staples this Friday for just $39.99 or double...:confused:


You do mean 5MBs???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ephemeral
Senior Member
Avatar
896 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: UK (London)
     
Nov 23, 2006 04:13 |  #9

slyone wrote in post #2301889 (external link)
Thanks for the assistance! It seems the Sandisk writes almost 30% faster than the Kingston pro, although I believe the camera is limited anyways to just over 5mps. Also the Sandisk has a lifetime warranty verses 3 years. Geez, the Kingston can be had for just $19.99 ARw/GCO at Buy.com verses the Ultra at Staples this Friday for just $39.99 or double...:confused:

IMHO the lifetime warrenty is only a bit of fluff. In 3 years time you might not even be using those small capacity memory cards. Also, if you card does lose your your images, it's lost. Having any sort of lifetime warrenty won't bring your data back.

Also, again IMHO, CF card speeds are just hype. Anyone who wants to spend 2-4 times more on a fast card for cameras that can't write to the CF card much faster thant he cheap cards is free to do so. Also, those who want to spend the said amount more for cards that copy to the PC x% times faster than my cheap cards are also free to do so...I just browse this forum while my slow el-cheape card slowly copies my 2gbs of images to my PC. I'm not a pro and can wait 5 mimutes to copy 2gb's to my PC.


Canon 5D + Grip | 85mm L f/1.2 | 17-40mm L f/4.0 | [COLOR=Silver]24-70mm L f/2.8 |[COLOR=Black] 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | Speedlite 580EX & 430EX | Manfrotto 190Pro + 488RC2
ephemeral.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Accentor
Senior Member
Avatar
647 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Europe
     
Nov 23, 2006 06:02 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Ephemeral wrote in post #2302686 (external link)
IMHO the lifetime warrenty is only a bit of fluff. In 3 years time you might not even be using those small capacity memory cards. Also, if you card does lose your your images, it's lost. Having any sort of lifetime warrenty won't bring your data back.

Also, again IMHO, CF card speeds are just hype. Anyone who wants to spend 2-4 times more on a fast card for cameras that can't write to the CF card much faster thant he cheap cards is free to do so. Also, those who want to spend the said amount more for cards that copy to the PC x% times faster than my cheap cards are also free to do so...I just browse this forum while my slow el-cheape card slowly copies my 2gbs of images to my PC. I'm not a pro and can wait 5 mimutes to copy 2gb's to my PC.

Sandisk (I use Extreme III 2Gb cards) do come with "RescuePRO" data recovery software on CD.


Canon 400D, (1DMkIII pre-ordered), 500mm f/4 L IS, 70-210 EF, 1.4x TC, BG-E3 grip, Manfrotto 055 + Wimberley II head, Lowepro Lenstrekker 600AW backpack, Crumpler bag.
"The glass in front of the camera and the flesh and blood behind it are more important than the camera itself". :rolleyes:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PaulB
Goldmember
1,543 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Leeds, Yorkshire
     
Nov 23, 2006 06:07 as a reply to  @ Ephemeral's post |  #11

It's not only about camera write speeds to the card but also about card write speeds when downloading to the computer - that's when the faster cards prove worthwhile.
Of course if you only take a few images at a time then waiting while the images download may not be a big deal but believe me when downloading a full 4Gb card from a 1Dmk2 the time saved by the speed of the Extreme III is very welcome.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Nov 23, 2006 09:08 |  #12

And the card will continue to be fast, or slow, when you upgrade to the next, faster, generation of camera. So if you buy the faster card now, you're giving yourself some growth room.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,576 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Just a quick question about CF card speed
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1733 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.