It's funny to read the replies when I mentioned manual mode. For years, I shot MANUAL mode only with medium format film.
Advocatus Diaboli mentions that he used the P mode when things got too busy for him. (Shooting manual for years, never got "busy" for me!)
A friend of mine ruined a wedding shooting the whole thing on P mode. (I guess you have to face a law suit to figure that out on your own. )
Advocatus Diaboli is my title, Tim is my name.
I'm wondering why it is you can't get good results from P mode. Like I said i've never used it before, but you let the camera set the exposure based on your metering mode, you choose your aperture/shutter speed split based on what you're tring to do. What's hard about that? And what's wrong with it? Why would you get sued for letting the cameras meter do some of the drudge work? Only if you don't understand you your equipment and can't effectively use it. Sure I could stay in manual mode, but it might take me an extra second or two to get my exposure right, and under high dynamic range conditions when a bride is walking in and out of the sun it's just a pain.
Under some situations (ie average dynamic range) it works fine. If there's high dynamic range (ie a light or a shaft of sunlight) then you have to be careful to use partial or spot metering, and you use exposure compensation depending on what you're shooting (tux/wedding dress). With film you don't have to make very accurate exposures because the lab fixes them for you, and you'd never know that you were way off unless they told you.
), but I used to use a Nikon SLR on full manual, and I used it for two years of my photography course, photographing everything from hot air balloons to ducks (huzzah!)

