Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 24 Nov 2006 (Friday) 16:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just getting started...

 
C.Steele
Senior Member
Avatar
254 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 24, 2006 16:57 |  #1

Hello!

I'm just getting started in the world of digital photography and image proccessing. These are the first images I thought were decent enough to spend any time on. I would like to know what some of the more experienced people here think about things like processing, composition, focus, etc. I take critisism well, so don't hold back:).

Whole scene

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Cropped tighter (with camera)
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Thanks for looking!
Chris

Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click the shutter. -Ansel Adams
Portland Wedding Photographers (external link) | Steele Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cobra351
Goldmember
Avatar
2,996 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Nov 24, 2006 18:57 |  #2

Welcome to the forums!

I like both here, I wish I could say I like either of them better for some reason, but I like both for different reasons (I like the first as it seems to show the progression of the stream quite well, and the second becuase the stream and bridge are stronger subjects). The only thing I'd try to both is maybe a little saturation boost and maybe some contrast as well. Both might help the pictures to "pop".

One note, be ready to find that not all like the water effect like that (from the slow shutter speed). I personally do, so as far as I'm concerned good job!


Canon 5D Mark II
Canon 40D - Infrared Modified (www.lifepixel.com (external link))
Canon Lenses: 17-40, 24-105 f/4 IS, 100 2.8 IS Macro, TS-E 90, 70-200 f/4 IS, 100-400 IS
Canon EF25 II , EF 1.4x II

Smith & Wesson M&P 340CT .357 Magnum

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Briancd
Senior Member
Avatar
345 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Sanctuary Point, NSW, Australia - 2 hours south of Sydney
     
Nov 24, 2006 18:59 |  #3

I prefer the original as it takes you on a journey up past the bridge to the top of the water flow. I would also increase the saturation a little to bring out the colours.

If you want other members to show you what they can do with your image go to your control panel, edit profice and click "yes" on the "Image edit and repost permission".


Brian

My two pet hates are - Male Chauvanists and women who will not do as they are told.

Canon 350D
Canon EF-S 18-55mm kit lens
Sigma AF 70-300mm F 4-5.6 APO DG Macro
Opteka Battery grip

Canon A75 (Now belongs to wife)
Lens adapter - Teleconverter lens TC-DC52

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C.Steele
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
254 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 24, 2006 19:21 as a reply to  @ Briancd's post |  #4

Thanks for the feedback so far. I took your advice and changed my settings so people could edit my images. That would be great to see what someone more experienced could do with it!

As far as saturation goes, I did crank it up a little overall, and a little more on the yellows. I really wanted that tree behind the bridge to pop. It still looks a little flat to me though. I was afraid to go too much however and have it look unnatural. This was one of the reasons I posted it here. I am hoping to learn something.

Also, the overall image doesn't look sharp to me and I don't know if it's just me/my computer or it really is soft. I took several shots of that scene and have a solid tripod and used mirror lock-up and they all look the same. Maybe it's just me, but if not and it's technique related I'd love some input there. I really wasn't sure where to focus to be honest. I tried on the rocks on the foreground on a few shots and I tried on the bridge on a few. I used f/22 for all to try to get the falls in the distance as clear as I could.

Anyway, I'll stop there for now. I really appreciate the replies. I'm glad I found these forums!

Chris


Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click the shutter. -Ansel Adams
Portland Wedding Photographers (external link) | Steele Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cobra351
Goldmember
Avatar
2,996 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Nov 24, 2006 19:45 as a reply to  @ C.Steele's post |  #5

Ok, one big thing about the sharpness you said you're concerned with. A lot of the problem is likely coming from shooting at f/22 (from light diffraction). Try shooting between f/9-16 for landscapes, that should help the clarity and sharpness in a great way. Also, focusing on something relatively closer to you will still, for the most part, allow objects behind it to still be in good focus.

I hope this made any sense?! :confused:


Canon 5D Mark II
Canon 40D - Infrared Modified (www.lifepixel.com (external link))
Canon Lenses: 17-40, 24-105 f/4 IS, 100 2.8 IS Macro, TS-E 90, 70-200 f/4 IS, 100-400 IS
Canon EF25 II , EF 1.4x II

Smith & Wesson M&P 340CT .357 Magnum

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbernet
send a search party to Mount Hood
19,157 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 24, 2006 23:44 |  #6

Where was that taken? Your screenname is NWShooter so I am guessing somewhere in Oregon or Washington - reminds me of the Eagle Creek trail in Oregon - but our weather hasn't allowed for shots like that....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Nov 24, 2006 23:52 |  #7

I like the first one better, composition looks good to me and it really has nothing to do with whethere it's digital or not anyway. As for the processing, I think a bit more contrast and satuaration may make things pop a bit more.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pagefile
Senior Member
Avatar
586 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: New Hampshire
     
Nov 25, 2006 01:00 |  #8

I think they both look very good. I would not chang a thing on them.



<<
My Gear>>

"It is better to solve the right problem the wrong way than to solve the wrong problem the right way.”
Richard Wesley Hamming

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyG
Worthless twinkle toes fairy
Avatar
3,719 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Nov 25, 2006 01:15 |  #9

I think they both look great and I love the "slow" shutter speed effect on the water.

Well done on your submissions and a big welcome to the forum!!!


Canon EOS 5D Mark II, 100-400IS L, 24-105 L[COLOR=black][FONT=&qu​ot] IS, 50mm f/1.4, Canon 430EX/580EX II, Kenko 1.5X, Epson R1900, Manfrotto 679B Monopod, 3021BPRO tripod, 808RC4 Head, 486RC2 Ballhead

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
C.Steele
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
254 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Portland, OR
     
Nov 25, 2006 03:27 |  #10

timbernet wrote in post #2309831 (external link)
Where was that taken? Your screenname is NWShooter so I am guessing somewhere in Oregon or Washington - reminds me of the Eagle Creek trail in Oregon - but our weather hasn't allowed for shots like that....

Close. It is off the old Columbia River Hwy, in the Gorge. I took it recently on the one day we actually saw the sun in the last month 11/18:rolleyes:. I took a drive up there that day because I figured with all the rain the falls would all be big and beautiful...and they were. They were so big in fact that I couldn't even get a good shot of Multnomah. The spray coming off the falls reached clear to the back of the observation area. I did pull off a few shots by getting way back and framing just the upper falls with some trees. I have never seen that much water coming over the falls though, quite impressive.

Thanks for all the comments so far. Saturation and contrast is coming up quite a bit so I guess I'll play around with that some more. Maybe I'll re-post the results. Thanks a bunch!

Chris


Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click the shutter. -Ansel Adams
Portland Wedding Photographers (external link) | Steele Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D. ­ Craig ­ Flory
Goldmember
1,333 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Nov 25, 2006 11:01 as a reply to  @ C.Steele's post |  #11

I like the image ... it reminds me of a sample image that came with Photoshop. Here is my version ... cropped and in a step-mount.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

D. Craig Flory PPA Certified, Cr.Photog.,
ASP // loryphotog@mindspring.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,307 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Just getting started...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
1118 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.