Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 28 Nov 2006 (Tuesday) 05:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Western Meadowlark

 
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Nov 28, 2006 05:27 |  #1

I like the detail in the feathers in the first one, while the second is a more typical shot of the meadowlark's colorful breast. Both taken at Quivera National Wildlife Refuge over Thanksgiving with EOS 30D and EF 100-400 at 400mm, ISO 800 and f/8.0. The first was exposed at 1/2000, and the second at 1/4000. C&C welcome.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SamAlfano
Senior Member
719 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Covington, Louisiana
     
Nov 28, 2006 06:03 |  #2

Number 2 is my favorite. I'd like to see a horizontal crop with some open area to the right. Both shots enhance beautifully with a bit of sharpening and noise reduction. / ~Sam




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Nov 28, 2006 06:35 as a reply to  @ SamAlfano's post |  #3

Both have been processed with Neat Image to remove noise (and to sharpen). Do you think these are noisy yet?

I agree with your comment about the cropping. I cropped these this way to print 4x6 for my files, and did not recrop for posting. If I were to print them for display, I would probably use a landscape format.

Thanks for your comments.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 28, 2006 09:43 |  #4

This lens shines when you have the light for it. I'm impressed. I'm even more impressed he let you get even that close. :D


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dancinec
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,035 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Carlsbad, California
     
Nov 28, 2006 10:31 |  #5

Excellent captures, the frontal view is the best. They are hard to close to, all I have is a beak peeking up above the grass. Of course, it was a shy California bird.


Dennis
Canon 20D, 30D, 40D, 50D, Canon 100 mm Macro, Canon 100-400mm, Canon 400mm 5.6L, Canon TC 1.4X, Tamron 28-75 mm, Bogen 3221 Tripod, Kirk BH-1 ballhead, Sigma EF-500 DG Super Flash, Canon 580 II Flash, Better Beamers, Whimberly Plamp.
My galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Nov 28, 2006 10:56 as a reply to  @ dancinec's post |  #6

That part of Kansas was overflowing with meadowlarks last weekend. As you drove down the side roads, you would flush out dozens at a time. This particular bird, of which I took 60 or so shots, was the least shy of any, and stayed put for several minutes.

Thanks for the comments. The 100-400 is indeed wonderful in good light.


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stephen ­ Stephen
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,345 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 168
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Nepean, ON, Canada
     
Nov 28, 2006 16:38 |  #7

Well done PK. Any reason you were use an ISO of 800? It looks as if you had lots of light.


Stephen
Feel free to check out my website
www.stephenjstephen.co​m (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ngannet
Goldmember
Avatar
3,164 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: NJ
     
Nov 28, 2006 16:40 |  #8

Beautiful shots of a striking bird. I love meadowlarks and they are one of the toughest birds to get shots of. For ISO 800 it sure looks clean. I was wondering too why you used 800. I've done that by mistake occasionally when I'm coming out of the woods and into brighter light.


RESPECTING NATURE while photographing it...
Canon 40D, Canon 400 mm f/5.6Lens, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0 Lens, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 Lens, Tamron 180mm f/3.5 lens, Manfrotto 679B monopod, Manfrotto tripod, Manfrotto 222 joystick head, Epson R800 photo printer. My gallery. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Nov 28, 2006 16:45 |  #9

I've found that the 30D performs very well at ISO 800. Odd, but true.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gary ­ Fairhead
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,425 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Ottawa On Canada
     
Nov 28, 2006 17:38 |  #10

I especially likre the second shot although i think underexpossing it with exposure compensation by 1/3 to 1/2 F stop could have taken the edge off and saturated the bird more. The 30D is indeed quite capable of 800 ISO but in good light I will drop her down to 100 ISO if i have a chance . If we could shoot at 100 ISO all the time then noise reduction software would be obsolete. I used to occasionaly shoot Koadachrome 25 ISO ( ok it was ASA back then) and you could blow those puppies up to 17 X 20 and there just wasn't any noise/grain to be found....super tight!!


Gary Fairhead C/C welcome .....

Canon 30 D,50D, Canon 500 F4 IS, 400 F5.6L ,200 F2.8L, 28-105mm F3.5-4.5, 1.4X TC/, Canon 580EX /Canon 100 2.8 Macro
http://www.pbase.com/p​hotofair/root&page=all (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Nov 28, 2006 19:37 as a reply to  @ Gary Fairhead's post |  #11

Inquiring minds want to know ;) !

These shots were taken at ISO 800 because the day started out very foggy. I wasn't getting much of anything worthwile for the first hour or so I was out, but I had it set at 800 just in case I saw something close by. When I ran across this meadowlark, the fog had just cleared, but I had not changed the setting, and did not take the time to do so. As it turned out, he posed for a long time, and I could have made the switch. Neat Image does wonders, however, and I am quite pleased with the final result.

(I did lower the ISO shortly after taking these, BTW.)


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bromm
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,920 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
     
Nov 28, 2006 19:43 as a reply to  @ pknight's post |  #12

Very nice captures, great colors and sharpness, well done.


Trevor Wadman

Canon 40D/350D Canon 400L F/5.6, Canon 70-200L F/4 non IS. Tamron 100-300,Canon 18-55 Kit Lens. Canon 1.4 II Extender, Canon 430EX speedlight.
http://s41.photobucket​.com/albums/e286/bromm​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,947 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Western Meadowlark
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1596 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.