Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 30 Nov 2006 (Thursday) 22:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What's wrong with my 350D's sensor?

 
Punisher77
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Nov 30, 2006 22:03 |  #1

Hey,

I love my 350D and I love my fancy lenses. Every now and then I get a shot that's completely ruined by some kind of a sensor glitch. No matter what ISO I'm shooting at I get a picture that's totally full of noise. Maybe 1 out of every 250 shots.

I've attached a few 100% crops. 1144 (hand) is at at ISO 100, 1219 (sign) is at ISO 400.

Any ideas what might be going on?

You can check out my portfolio (external link) to see that the rest of my shots are ok in general.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Flickr (external link) :: Portfolio (external link)
My humble kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
infinite012
Senior Member
Avatar
602 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Sterling, VA
     
Nov 30, 2006 22:13 |  #2

Are you shooting in RAW? If you're using Photoshop, ACR may be trying to compensate for lost shadow detail by adding EC or taking away shadows. Just a thought...


Michael
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Avatar
7,359 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Islamorada, FL
     
Nov 30, 2006 22:27 |  #3

infinite012 wrote in post #2336711 (external link)
Are you shooting in RAW? If you're using Photoshop, ACR may be trying to compensate for lost shadow detail by adding EC or taking away shadows. Just a thought...

i second


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Gallery (external link)My Gear
what the L. just go for it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 01, 2006 08:04 |  #4

Yup - the odd underexposure being boosted in PP.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Punisher77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Dec 01, 2006 10:04 |  #5

infinite012 wrote in post #2336711 (external link)
Are you shooting in RAW? If you're using Photoshop, ACR may be trying to compensate for lost shadow detail by adding EC or taking away shadows. Just a thought...

Yes, I am shooting in RAW but it has this effect in both Picassa and PS. AFAIK the photo is not underexposed. I can take two shots side by side and one of them has the crazy noise and the other doesn't.


Flickr (external link) :: Portfolio (external link)
My humble kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FREEZE
Senior Member
Avatar
607 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Manitoba Canada
     
Dec 01, 2006 10:41 |  #6

Card problem?




Freeze:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 01, 2006 10:47 |  #7

it's pattern noise, espcially seen in dark areas when shot in high ISO. If you are only getting this 1 out of 250 shots, I'd say it's pretty normal.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chr15b
Member
51 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Dec 01, 2006 10:52 |  #8

Tee Why wrote in post #2338555 (external link)
it's pattern noise, espcially seen in dark areas when shot in high ISO. If you are only getting this 1 out of 250 shots, I'd say it's pretty normal.

that cant be right, can it?

what your saying is take two pictures one after the other and at random one 'might' be full of noise?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dante ­ King
"Cream of Corn" BurgerMeister
Avatar
9,134 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: San Anselmo, California
     
Dec 01, 2006 10:59 |  #9

it is underexposure compensation like stated above but the editing software.


Dante
I am not an Lcoholic. Lcoholics go to meetings!
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:01 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Please post the entire image frame instead of just crops.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prep
Member
245 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Perth WA
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:03 |  #11

The hand shot shows a quite evident pattern, both vertical and horizontal. I would suspect a loose ground in the body or lens somewhere.

What lens is it BTW?


~pr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:04 |  #12

chr15b wrote in post #2338579 (external link)
that cant be right, can it?

what your saying is take two pictures one after the other and at random one 'might' be full of noise?

No, if it's the same shot with same settings and with same processing, no.
Unless the sensor has gotten hotter (like being left in a car) where more noise will be introduced. Another thing might be a random electromagnetic interference.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Punisher77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:33 |  #13

Tee Why wrote in post #2338555 (external link)
it's pattern noise, espcially seen in dark areas when shot in high ISO. If you are only getting this 1 out of 250 shots, I'd say it's pretty normal.

The first shot is at ISO 100 and the second is at ISO 400. I do not consider either of thsoe "high ISO".


Flickr (external link) :: Portfolio (external link)
My humble kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Punisher77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:35 |  #14

Dante King wrote in post #2338614 (external link)
it is underexposure compensation like stated above but the editing software.

Would that be the case in both Picassa AND Photoshop? The histograms look quite normal in both pictures.


Flickr (external link) :: Portfolio (external link)
My humble kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Punisher77
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
     
Dec 01, 2006 11:36 |  #15

prep wrote in post #2338630 (external link)
The hand shot shows a quite evident pattern, both vertical and horizontal. I would suspect a loose ground in the body or lens somewhere.

What lens is it BTW?

Loose ground? Interesting... Have you heard/seen this before?

I shot the first (hand, ISO100) with the 17-40 f/4L and the second (sign, ISO400) with the 50 f/1.4.


Flickr (external link) :: Portfolio (external link)
My humble kit

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,008 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
What's wrong with my 350D's sensor?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1919 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.