Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Dec 2006 (Sunday) 09:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sensor cleaning...?

 
BrewsterPilot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
484 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Dec 04, 2006 09:21 |  #16

ChrisBlaze wrote in post #2350636 (external link)
my question is how do you clean the sensor when it has the shielding over it for the self cleaning?

In "normal" DSLR's w/o the sensor cleaning unit, the dust sticks to the sensor, right?
Well, in the EOS 400D there indeed is a thin sheet of plastic in front of the sensor, so the dust doesn't adhere directly to the sensor, but to the plastic, where it is supposed to be "vibrated off" with the piezoelectric blah blah thingy. Many reviewers, however, don't exactly praise the function of the sensor cleaning unit, so I'll probably have to remove the stubborn dust by hand.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gkuenning
Goldmember
Avatar
1,507 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Claremont (near LA), California
     
Dec 05, 2006 02:54 |  #17

Glenn NK wrote in post #2350601 (external link)
IMy last shot of a shoot is of the clear sky (white clouds or plain light coloured walls will do) with the lens stopped right down. Then when I download my pics, I have one showing the condition of my sensor - if needed, it gets cleaned for the next shooting.

I have a couple of questions about those sky shots. First, I'm still trying to figure out why stopping down matters (I haven't had a time to sketch an optical diagram yet, or maybe I could figure it out myself). Second, does focus matter? I seem to see blobs better when I'm close-focused. Third, does lens length matter? If so, is it more important to use a long lens or to go for a closer focus?

Currently looking for the time to do a practice run on a filter before my first cleaning...


Geoff
All I want is a 10-2000 f/0.5L with no distortion that weighs 100 grams, fits in my pocket, and costs $300. Is that too much to ask?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Dec 05, 2006 03:07 |  #18

ChrisBlaze wrote in post #2350636 (external link)
my question is how do you clean the sensor when it has the shielding over it for the self cleaning?

BrewsterPilot wrote in post #2351642 (external link)
In "normal" DSLR's w/o the sensor cleaning unit, the dust sticks to the sensor, right?
Well, in the EOS 400D there indeed is a thin sheet of plastic in front of the sensor, so the dust doesn't adhere directly to the sensor, but to the plastic, where it is supposed to be "vibrated off" with the piezoelectric blah blah thingy. Many reviewers, however, don't exactly praise the function of the sensor cleaning unit, so I'll probably have to remove the stubborn dust by hand.

gkuenning wrote in post #2355798 (external link)
I have a couple of questions about those sky shots. First, I'm still trying to figure out why stopping down matters (I haven't had a time to sketch an optical diagram yet, or maybe I could figure it out myself). Second, does focus matter? I seem to see blobs better when I'm close-focused. Third, does lens length matter? If so, is it more important to use a long lens or to go for a closer focus?

Currently looking for the time to do a practice run on a filter before my first cleaning...

You are never cleaning the sensor...you only clean the filter over the sensor. All DSLR's have a filter over the sensor to protect it. The dust sticks to the filter and is what we need to remove.

Stopping down the lens increases the depth of field in an image...as you stop it down further and further...more comes into focus. By f/16 or so...dust on the sensor starts to become very evident. It doesn't matter what you focus on....you can focus on a white wall at 2' or the sky at infinity...both shots will expose dust bunnies on the sensor as long as the lens is stopped down.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ianfp
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: UK
     
Dec 05, 2006 06:57 |  #19

I believe that the conductive coating on the xti sensor window is made of Indium Tin oxide. In my experience, this coating can be rather soft, so I would treat it with some caution!


Ian
Nikon D850, 85mm f/1.4G
5D2
EF17-40 f/4.0 L, EF135 f/2.0L EF200 f/2.8L

EF24-105L, EF100 f/2.8L Macro. EOS-M, 22mm f/2
Hasselblad 500C/M, Planar 80mm f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Dec 05, 2006 09:46 |  #20

gkuenning wrote in post #2355798 (external link)
I have a couple of questions about those sky shots. First, I'm still trying to figure out why stopping down matters (I haven't had a time to sketch an optical diagram yet, or maybe I could figure it out myself). Second, does focus matter? I seem to see blobs better when I'm close-focused. Third, does lens length matter? If so, is it more important to use a long lens or to go for a closer focus?

Currently looking for the time to do a practice run on a filter before my first cleaning...

Stopping down matters because then you're illuminating the dust with a point light source rather than an area light source. Look at your shadow outside on a bright, sunny day and notice the crisp edges. Then go inside unnder fluorescent lights and see how diffuse it gets. Or light from a flash both direct and indirect.

If you're not focussed on your subject it'll further blur the background "noise", masking details in the picture that might be mistaken for dust. Think OOF blur.

Lens f.l. doesn't matter except that longer lenses have shallower DoF and typically stop down further, both of which will help accentuate the dust.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Dec 06, 2006 15:03 |  #21

Today the sky is finally clear and blue, so I'm going out for a few hours.

I will check the sensor again, but from previous indoor testing (shooting at a light coloured wall), I found that short focal length shows the dirt spots clearer that longer focal length (24 - 105L). So I test at 24 mm.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
naqs
Goldmember
Avatar
1,814 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Dec 07, 2006 03:43 |  #22

Southswede wrote in post #2348323 (external link)
I can't remember which one, but I tried the Lens Pen recomendation of one of the moderators. It is faster and does a better job than any other method I have tried.

how do you use the lens pen to clean the sensor? ??? I'm can't understand how to do that


Nathan[I][SIZE=1] [CENTER]
[SIZE=1]www.nathanwalker.co.nz (external link) | Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
divetex
Mostly Lurking
12 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas area
     
Dec 11, 2006 10:56 |  #23

OS220sl wrote in post #2349208 (external link)
I just finished my first successful sensor cleaning on my 30D. I pickup a Returned 30D with Kit lens form Costco about month ago. The price was right. After extensive testing the only thing I found wrong with the camera was the sensor was very dusty.

I tried cleaning it with air from a mustard shaped bottle. The bottle was new and I also washed it very good. I use them in my business for holding different chemicals. It took some dust off, but not enough. So I purchased a sensor cleaning kit with the rocket blower from CleaningDigitalCameras​.com. Comes with the Rocket Blower and everything you need to wet clean the sensor.

I first blew off the sensor with the RB about 10 times. Then I used the sensor swab wrapped with a Pec-Pad and two drops of Eclipse. Took one swipe across the top half of the sensor flipped the sensor swap over and used the other edge and swiped the bottom half of the sensor. Put everything back together and took some test shots, Expecting to find a few spec's of dust left over. But to my surprise it was spotless. Clean as a Whistle. The whole kit cost me $37 shipped. They have extensive information on their web page on sensor cleaning. Another source for sensor cleaning supplies is www.copperhillimages.c​om (external link) I have not used them but have heard good things.

Jon III

I clean my XT the same way, with a sensor swab wrapped with a Pec-Pad and two drops of Eclipse. It's so very easy, I can't believe I was so paranoid for so long about "not touching the sensor."




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,508 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
Sensor cleaning...?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2451 guests, 101 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.