CONDYPET CONTEST: THE CUTEST CHUBBY PET ON POTN (Animals only)

Olli wrote in post #2356185
Sometimes I wonder, if Elk Pat (or Sari) is one of those.

I think that having to work for living is decidedly boring, demeaning and so ungentlemanly (unladylike).

PetKal wrote in post #2356183
POTN seems to harbour the brightest human element on the planet. As an example, take a look at master Belmondo: the man appears to do didley squat all day, yet he owns 10's of k$ worth of photo gear.

You seem to forget.....

I'm a moderator, so not only do I get paid a huge salary for my services to POTN, but Canon sends me free camera equipment. Why else would anyone want this job?

PetKal wrote in post #2356195
I think that having to work for living is decidedly boring, demeaning and so ungentlemanly (unladylike).

So nappies as xmas present for E Pat!

belmondo wrote in post #2356204
You seem to forget.....

I'm a moderator, so not only do I get paid a huge salary for my services to POTN, but Canon sends me free camera equipment. Why else would anyone want this job?

Masochism ?

dumb .. icecream can be used for better reasons

:p

PetKal wrote in post #2356183
POTN seems to harbour the brightest human element on the planet. As an example, take a look at master Belmondo: the man appears to do didley squat all day, yet he owns 10's of k$ worth of photo gear.

He polishes ... he researches ... he coverts ... Hell son, that a full-time job with overtime

Olli wrote in post #2356185
Sometimes I wonder, if Elk Pat (or Sari) is one of those.

Sari don't wear nappies much ... she told me in another thread! I think she's just lazy and hangs out in bars all day!

Pete I dunno! I mean, he is also a 'member' at some crummy 'inline skaters' forum and runs an online 'Thus Spake Zarathustra' study circle for OAP's. He could well be plumbed in permanent to his lav

PetKal wrote in post #2356195
I think that having to work for living is decidedly boring, demeaning and so ungentlemanly (unladylike).

Agreed ... especially so for we ex landed-gentlemen fallen on hard times

marie wrote in post #2356312

A classic Marie ... a work of genius that becomes so when one spots the young lad in bra and panty set lying amongst the rocks below.

MRaiford wrote in post #2356316

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

Does that qualify as cute, but daft?

Yup ... on the button

I'm drawing a photographic blank with 'cute & dumb'...does this work?? Cute because its colourful and Dumb because some simple designs just cant be improved upon. If this doesnt work I can post all kinds of faces taken up close at 10mm

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Is this sparrow only cute, or also dumb (sitting on cold wire glancing that similarly dumb shooter)?

sugarzebra wrote in post #2356491
I'm drawing a photographic blank with 'cute & dumb'...does this work?? Cute because its colourful and Dumb because some simple designs just cant be improved upon. If this doesnt work I can post all kinds of faces taken up close at 10mm

Nice shot Scottie but you're really stretching your criteria (please see Doctor if it becomes enflamed!)

Dumb and simple are not the same, but then I am a scholar with significant eduKashunal merits and a large Thesaurus in hand; you may well not be so honoured, i.e. dumb

Avoid close up piggy-faced shots please. We had enough with Lola, or whatever Webby's wife is called

marie wrote in post #2356312
:p

A great shot. The only thing disturbing about it is that the chap reminds me of James (aka NeilR).
Also, the ocean is draining to the left.

Olli wrote in post #2356506
Is this sparrow only cute, or also dumb (sitting on cold wire glancing that similarly dumb shooter)?

Cute, but I don't see how you get dumb from that face. Also, for all we know there could be a flood undernieth her and so she flew to higher ground; that would be an act of intelligence. more so as you are clearly up to your waste in water (should my scenario as outlined be true!)

PetKal wrote in post #2356541
The only thing disturbing about it is that the chap reminds me of James (aka NeilR).

I see a likeness but I believe James has two legs while this chap is clearly a monopod (I prefer not to imagine James as a tripod mind you!!!!)

condyk wrote in post #2356508
Nice shot Scottie but you're really stretching your criteria (please see Doctor if it becomes enflamed!)

Dumb and simple are not the same, but then I am a scholar with significant eduKashunal merits and a large Thesaurus in hand; you may well not be so honoured, i.e. dumb

Avoid close up piggy-faced shots please. We had enough with Lola, or whatever Webby's wife is called

Now I'm in worse shape .....the thought was its a dumb idea to try and improve on something so simple. I am a doctor though, so I'll take your sage advice and keep talking to myself and see if things improve, but right now those close up piggy-faced shots are looking better & better

When it comes to dumb, one can hardly improve on Canadian hosers taking their baby fish for a stroll.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

OK Pete....you win! Only in Canada, eh?