1)
2)
![]() | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE |
3)
4)
sumozebra Senior Member 575 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Hong Kong More info | Dec 03, 2006 22:06 | #1 1) 2)
3) 4) Sumozebra Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jra Cream of the Crop 6,568 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Ohio More info | Dec 03, 2006 22:09 | #2 Not bad at all IMO, although you seem to be repeating the same "theme" in pics 1, 3 and 4. As far as what I like best, it would be pic number 1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jamiepeter Senior Member 271 posts Joined Nov 2006 Location: Canada More info | Dec 03, 2006 22:20 | #3 Unique gown--I've seen the posing style in 1,3,4 in quite a few portfolios. I'm not really a fan. Just shows disconnection between the couple in my opinion, which obviously is not a good theme on your wedding day. 2 is cute and I like the locations you shot at! 30D - nifty fifty - tamron 28-75 f/2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WxGuesser Senior Member 630 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Vacaville, Ca More info | Dec 03, 2006 22:25 | #4 i like #2 the best.. i don't really like the scaffolding and cars in the pics... Canon 350D | EF 17-40 f4 L | EF 50 f1.8 | "Kit Lens" | EF 70-200 f2.8 L on order | Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro | EF 1.4x II L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lil_miss Goldmember 4,075 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Auckland, NZ More info | Dec 03, 2006 23:46 | #5 |
Kelsey-Lee Senior Member 732 posts Joined Oct 2006 More info | Dec 04, 2006 00:06 | #6 lil_miss wrote in post #2350429 The lighting seems a little harsh - very flat white.. to me it doesnt portray romance and love as a wedding probably should.... nice effort though They don't really work as wedding photos IMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 04, 2006 03:15 | #7 Oops, sorry, forgot to add another line 6) And as for the lighting, i agree, it's a bit harsh, even with a Lumiquest softbox, It was either get the light in there, or none at all. It was already getting pretty dark towards 5pm so was pretty much S.O.L. Sumozebra Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wagonwheel Senior Member 688 posts Likes: 303 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Dallas/FW area, TX More info | Dec 04, 2006 04:10 | #8 No. 1 is awsome. The important question is, does the couple like them? Lovin' my 80D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
agosling Senior Member 455 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Broken Hill More info | Dec 04, 2006 06:27 | #9 I like the first one it's a nice idea and the PP works well. Unfortunately all the others seem to be way soft, you are going to need to get yourself some good glass to take it to the next level. http://www.facebook.com/AndrewGosling.tbgsport
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jessiper EEK! I don't want a title anymore! 2,067 posts Joined Aug 2006 Location: Portland, OR USA More info | Dec 04, 2006 10:51 | #10 I can't see the 2nd one, but I agree about a theme overdone. I think it could work for 1 pic, but not a whole series (as wedding photos). The light is good in the first, the third is too flash-y, and the forth is a bit dark and flat. That being said, I think you really captured her beauty in the 1st and 4th. The pic you posted separately is cute, it might be a bit dark, though, but that's easily fixed. Thanks for sharing! *Gear: 5D Mark II, 2 5D's, 30D, 85mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, 24mmL 1.4, 45mm TS-E, 16-35mmL 2.8 II, 70-200L 2.8 IS, 100mm 2.8 macro, 15mm 2.8 fisheye, 580EXII, 580EX, 430EX, AB 800, AB Ring flash, lots of PW's, stands, umbrellas, etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Dec 04, 2006 15:46 | #11 Your images are too large, please delete them and repost at 800 pixels wide or less. I can't see your whole image on one screen. See image posting guidelines. If you don't a mod will likely remove them. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MALI Senior Member 430 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Bloomington, IN More info | Dec 04, 2006 20:36 | #12 I did not like them; the reasons: the posing is not my style; there is too much flash in all of them, the color and contrast are not there; the backgrounds simply suck. For me, the wedding pictures should be dreamy and fun and vibrant and eye catching and romantic, which I believe none of these are. Sorry I had to say all negative things but I am trying to be honest, which you need I guess. Thanks for sharing. Canon 20D, 10-22, 24-70L,70-200L f/2.8 IS, 580 EX, RS-80N3, EP-EX15, BG-E2, E1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lin-z Goldmember 1,247 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: GA More info | Dec 04, 2006 21:36 | #13 They all seem a very soft. I like the idea of the posing here, but not the way it was done in these shots. I think they would have been much more successful poses had you set it up so that they were looking towards each other and not away. These are a little stand off-ish.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
monter Senior Member 614 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2006 More info | Dec 04, 2006 22:01 | #14 no offense, but I'm not a fan of them. They look like the same pose, which does not show love or a connection. On the ring shots, the flash has created a couple of hot spots on the hands. But what matters is does the couple like them?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
islandphoto Goldmember 2,358 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2006 Location: Maui More info | Dec 04, 2006 22:47 | #15 Interesting idea and I've seen others post similar... Not sure about all that space in between the couple. Could you post some more of that day? Possibly when they look a little closer? - Joanna
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1093 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||